The effects of task organization on skill and knowledge in physical education

  1. Calderón Luquin, Antonio
  2. Andrew Hastie, Peter
  3. Palao Andrés, José Manuel
  4. Ortega Toro, Enrique
Revista:
RICYDE. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte

ISSN: 1885-3137

Año de publicación: 2013

Volumen: 9

Número: 31

Páginas: 48-59

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5232/RICYDE2013.03104 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: RICYDE. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte

Resumen

El estudio examinó el efecto de tres formas de organización (filas, circuitos y juegos) sobre el aprendizaje técnico y conceptual de tres habilidades atléticas (vallas, salto de altura y lanzamiento de peso). Ciento veinte y dos estudiantes (71 chicos y 51 chicas de 13,4 ± 1,2 años) de Educación Secundaria, participaron en nueve sesiones de enseñanza-aprendizaje durante la clase de educación física, en las que se utilizaron los tres tipos de organización de la práctica. Los resultados muestran que el tipo de organización tuvo un efecto significativo sobre el aprendizaje técnico y conceptual, en alumnos con nivel de habilidad bajo y medio, aunque con diferencias entre las disciplinas. Así por ejemplo, los alumnos mejoraron significativamente en lanzamiento de peso cuando practicaron en filas, y en vallas cuando practicaron en juegos. Estos resultados refuerzan por tanto la idea que es estas variables deben ser tenidas en consideración por los profesores de educación física cuando planifican sus sesiones.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical statistics for medical research. New York: Chapman and Hall.
  • Ashy, M. H.; Lee, A. M.; & Landing, D. K. (1988). Relationships of practice using correct technique to achievement in a motor skill. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 7, 115-120.
  • Barreiros, J., Figueiredo, T., & Godinho, M. (2007). The contextual interference effect in applied settings. European Physical Education Review, 13(2), 195-208.
  • Behar. J. (1993). Sesgos del observador. En M. T. Anguera (Ed.), Metodología observacional en la investigación psicológica (pp. 27-76). Barcelona: Promociones y Publicaciones Universitarias.
  • Buck, M.; Harrison, J. M.; & Brice, G. R. (1991). An analysis of learning trials and their relationship to achievement in volleyball. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 10, 134-152.
  • Calderón, A.; Palao, J. M., & Ortega, E. (2005). Incidencia de la forma de organización sobre la cantidad y la calidad de práctica, el feedback impartido y la percepción de motivación en la enseñanza de habilidades atléticas. Cultura, Ciencia, y Deporte, 1, 145-155.
  • Carlson, T. B. (1995). We hate gym: student alienation from physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 14, 467-477.
  • Carr, G. A. (1999). Fundamentals of Track and Field (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Chen, A., & Zhu, W. (2001). Revisiting the assumptions for inferential statistical analysis: a conceptual guide for pedagogy research in physical education. Quest, 53, 418-439.
  • Feltz, D., & Brown. E. (1984). Perceived competence in soccer skills among young soccer players. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6, 385-394.
  • Gil, F., Pascua, M., & Sánchez, R. (2000). Manual Básico de Atletismo. Madrid: Real Federación Española de Atletismo.
  • Granda, J.; Barbero, J. C., & Montilla, M. (2008). Effects of different practice conditions on acquisition, retention, and transfer of soccer skills by 9-year-old schoolchildren. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106, 447-460.
  • Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 212-224.
  • Guthrie, M. (2003). Coaching track and field successfully. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Hastie, P. A. (2000). An ecological analysis of a Sport Education season. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 19, 355-373.
  • Hastie, P. A.; Calderón. A.; Palao. J. M., & Ortega, E. (2011). Quantity and quality of practice: interrelationships between task organization and student skill level in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 82(4), 784-787.
  • Hubiche, J. L., & Pradet, M. (1999). Comprender el atletismo. Su práctica y enseñanza. Madrid: Inde.
  • Human Kinetics (Producer). (1999a). Jumps. [video]. Champaign: Human Kinetics.
  • Human Kinetics (Producer). (1999b). Throws. [video]. Champaign: Human Kinetics.
  • Metzler, M. W. (2005). Instructional models for physical education. Scottsdale, AZ: Holcomb Hathaway.
  • Piasenta, J. (2000). Aprender a observar. Barcelona: Inde.
  • Renshaw, I., Chow, J., Davids, K., & Hammond, J. (2010). A constraints-led perspective to understanding skill acquisition and game play: a basis for integration of motor learning theory and physical education praxis?, Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 15(2), 117-137.
  • Rink, J. E. (2005). Teaching physical education for learning (5th ed). Boston: McGraw Hill
  • Rink, J. (2003). Effective instruction in physical education, en S.J. Silverman & C.D. Ennis (Eds.), Student learning in physical education: Applying research to enhance instruction (pp. 165-186). Champaign. IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Russell, D. M. & Newell, K. M. (2007). How persistent and general is the contextual interference effect? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78, 318-327.
  • Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg. C. A. (2008). Motor learning and performance: A situation-based learning approach. Champaign. IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Seners, P. (2001). Didáctica del Atletismo. Inde: Madrid.
  • Siedentop, D., & D. Tannehill. 1999. Developing teaching skills in physical education. 4th ed. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.
  • Silverman, S. (1985). Relationship of engagement and practice trials to student achievement. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 5, 13-21.
  • Silverman, S. (1994). Research on teaching and student achievement. Sport Science Review, 3, 83-90.
  • Silverman, S. (2005). Thinking long term: Physical education's role in movement and mobility. Quest, 57, 138-147.
  • Silverman, S.; Devillier. R.; & Ramirez. T. (1991). The validity of academic learning time in physical education (ALT-PE) as a process of measure of student achievement. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 62, 319-325.
  • Silverman, S.; Kulinna, P., & Crull, G. (1995). Skill-related task structures, explicitness, and accountability: relationships with student achievement. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 66, 32-44.
  • Silverman, S.; Mays, A., & Subramaniam, P. (1998). Task structures, student practice, and skill in physical education. The Journal of Educational Research, 91. 298-306.
  • Silverman, S.; Tyson, L., & Marrs, L. (1988). Relationships of organization, time, and student achievement in physical education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 247-257.
  • Sweeting, T., & Rink, J. (1999). Effects of direction instruction and environmentally designed instruction on the process and product characteristics of a fundamental skill. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 18, 216-233.
  • Tjeerdsma, B. L.; Rink, J. E., & Graham, K. C. (1996). Student perceptions, values, and beliefs prior to, during, and after badminton instruction. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 15, 464-476.
  • Tinning, R., & Fitzclarence, L. (1992). Postmodern youth culture and the crisis in australian secondary school physical education. Quest, 44, 287-303.
  • USA Track & Field, (2000). USA Track and field coaching manual. Champaign. IL: Human Kinetics.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet