Masculinity Ideology and Gender Equality: Considering Neosexism

Referencias bibliográficas

• Addis, M., Mansfield, A. & Syzdek, M. (2010.). Is "Masculinity" a Problem?: Framing the Effects of Gendered Social Learning in Men. Psychology of men and masculinities, 11, 77-90. doi:10.1037/a0018602
• Bargard, A. & Hyde, J. (1991). A study of feminist identity development in women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15 (2), 181-201.
• Barnett, R. & Rivers C. (2004). Same Difference: How Gender Myths are Hurting Our Relationships, Our Children, and Our Jobs. New York: Basic Books.
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderatormediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
• Barreto, M. & Ellemers, N. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: how it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 633-642. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.270
• Branon, R. & Juni, S. (1984). A scale for measuring attitudes toward masculinity. Psychological Documents, 14, 6-7.
• Burn, S., Aboud, R. & Moyles, C. (2000). The relationships between gender social identity and support for feminism. Sex Roles, 42, 1081-1089.
• Cameron, J. (2001). Social identity, modern sexism, and perceptions of personal and group discrimination by women and men. Sex Roles, 45, 743-766.
• Campbell, B., Schellenberg, E. G. & Senn, C. Y. (1997). Evaluating measures of contemporary sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 89-101.
• Cowan, G., Mestlin, M. & Masek, J. (1992). Predictors of feminist selflabeling. Sex Roles, 27, 321-330.
• Cuéllar, I., Sánchez-López, M.P. & Dresch, V. (2011). El Inventario de Conformidad con las Normas de Género Masculinas (CMNI) en la población española. Anales de Psicología, 27 (1), 170-178.
• Davis, S.N. & Greenstein, Th. (2009). Gender Ideology: Components, Predictors, and Consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 87-105.doiI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115920
• Downing, N. & Roush, K. (1985). From passive acceptance to active commitment: a model of feminist identity development for women. The Counselling Psychologist, 13, 695-709.
• Fischer, A. R., & Good, G. E. (1998). "New directions for the study of gender role attitudes: A cluster analytic investigation of masculinity ideologies." Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 371-384.
• Fischer, A. R., Tokar, D., Mergl, M., Good, G., Hill, M. & Blum, S.(2000). Assessing womeńs feminist identity development. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 15-29.
• Gardiner, J. (2005). Men, masculinities, and feminist theory. In M. Kimmel, H. Jefff & R. Connell (Eds.), Handbook of Studies on Men & Masculinities (pp. 35-50). Thousands Oaks: Sage.
• Gerstman, E., & Kramer, D. (1997). Feminist development identity: Psychometric analyses of two feminist identity scales. Sex Roles, 36, 327-348.
• Glick, P., Larsen, S., Johnson, C. & Branstiter, H. (2005). Evaluation of sexy women in low and high status jobs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 713-728. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00238
• Glick, P. (2006). Ambivalent sexism, power distance and gender inequality accros cultures. In S. Guimond (Ed.), Social comparison and social psychology: Understanding cognitions, intergroup relations and culture (pp. 283-302). Cambridge: Cambrige University Press.
• Good, G. & Sherrod, N. (2001). The Psychology of Men and masculinity: Research status and future directions. In R. Unger (Ed.), Psychology of Women and Gender (pp. 201-214). New Jersey: Wiley.
• Goodwin, S. & Fiske, S. (2001). Power and gender: The doubleedged sword of ambivalence. In R. Unger (Ed.), Psychology of Women and Gender (pp. 358-368.). New Jersey: Wiley.
• Guimond, S., Dambrun, M., Michinov, N. & Duarte, S. (2003). Does Social Dominance Generate Prejudice? Integrating Individual and Contextual Determinants of Intergroup Cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84. 697-721. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.697
• Hearn, J. & Pringle, K. (2006). European perspectives on men and masculinities: national and transnational approaches. Palgrave: McMillan.
• Henderson-King, D. H. & Stewart, A. J. (1994). Women or feminists? Assessing women's group consciousness. Sex Roles, 31, 505-516.
• Henderson-King, D. H. & Stewart, A. J. (1997). Feminist consciousness: Perspectives on women's experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 415-426.
• Holter, O. (2005). Social theories for researching man and mascunilities. In M. Kimmel, J. Hearnm & R. Connell (Eds.), Handbook of studies on men & masculinities (pp. 5-34). Thousand Oakes: Sage.
• Jacobs, J. R. (1996). Psychological and demographic correlates of men's perceptions of and attitudes toward sexual harassment. Dissertation Abstracts International, 57, 3826A.
• Kimmel, M. (1987). Rethinking "masculinity": New directions in research. In M. Kimmel (Ed), Changing men: New directions in research on men and masculinity (pp. 9-24). Newbury Pak, CA: Sage.
• Konrad, A. M. & Hartmann, L (2002). Gender differences in attitudes toward affirmative action programs in Australia: Effects of beliefs, interests, and attitudes toward women. Sex Roles, 45, 415-432.doi: 10.1023/A:1014317800293
• Levant, R. F., Hirsch, L., Celentano, E., Cozza, T., Hill, S., MacEachern, M., Marty, N. & Schnedeker, J. (1992). The male role: an investigation of contemporary norms. Journal of Mental Health Counselling, 14, 325-337.
• Levant, R. (1995). Toward the reconstruction of masculinity. In R. Levant & W. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 229-251.) New York: Basic Books.
• Levant, R., Rankin, T., Williams, C., Hasan, N. & Smalley B. (2010). Evaluation of the factor structure and construct validity of scores on the Male Role Norms Inventory. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 11, 25-37. doi: 10.1037/a0017637
• Liss, M. L., O'Connor, C., Morosky, E. & Crawford, M. (2001). What makes a feminist? Predictors and correlates of feminist social identity in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 124-133.
• Mahalik, J. R., Locke B., Ludlow, L., Diemer, M., Scott, R. P. J. & Gottfried, M. (2003). Development of the conformity to masculine norms to masculine norms inventory. Psychology of Men and Masculintiy, 4, 3-25. doi: 10.1037/1524-9220.4.1.3
• Masser, B. & Abrams, A. (1999). Contemporary Sexism. The Relationships Among Hostility, Benevolence, and Neosexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 503-517.doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00378.x
• Miller, T. (2009). Masculinity. In F. Essed, D. Goldberrg & A. Kobayashi (Eds.), A comparison to gender studies (pp. 114-131). Massachusetts: Blackwell.
• Moya, M. & Expósito, F. (2001). Nuevas formas, viejos intereses: neosexismo en varones españoles. Psicothema, 13 (4), 643-649.
• Myaskovsky, L. & Wittig, M. A. (1997). Predictors of feminist social identity among college women. Sex Roles, 37, 861-883. doi: 10.1007/BF02936344
• Ng, S., Dunne, M. & Cataldo, M. (1995). Feminist identities and preferred strategies for advancing women's positive selfconcept. The Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 561-572.DOI: 10.1080/00224545.1995.9712229
• Park, J. & Roberton, M. (2004). Attitudes toward women mediate the gender effect on attitudes toward sexist language. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 233-239. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00140
• Pleasants, R. (2011). Men learning feminism: Protecting privileges through discourse of resistence. Men & Masculinities, 14, 230-250. DOI: 10.1177/1097184X11407048
• Pleck, J.H. (1995). The gender role strain paradigm: An update. In R. Levant & W. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp.11-32). New York: Basic Books.
• Pleck, J. H., Sonenstein, F. L. & Ku, L. C. (1993). Masculinity ideology and its correlates. In S. Oskamp & M. Constanzo (Eds.), Gender Issues in Social Psychology (pp. 85-110). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Rickard, K. M. (1989). The relationship of selfmonitored dating behaviors to level of feminist identity on the feminist identity scale. Sex Roles, 20, 213-226. DOI: 10.1007/BF00287993
• Ridgeway, C. (1997). Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment. American Sociological Review, 62, 218-235.
• Ridgeway, C. (2006). Linking Social Structure and Interpersonal Behavior: A Theoretical Perspective on Cultural Schemas and Social Relations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69, 5-16.
• Ridgeway, C. & Correll, S. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: a theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender and Society, 18, 510-31. doi: 10.1177/0891243204265269
• Rudman, L. & Glick, P. (2008). The social psychology of gender. New York: The Guilford Press.
• Sinn, J. S. (1993). Masculinity ideology: establishing convergent and discriminant validity (Unpublished masteŕs thesis). Old Dominion University.
• Sinn, J. S. (1997). The predictive and discriminant validity of masculinity ideology. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 117-135.
• Smiler, A. (2004). Thirty years after the discovery of gender: Psychological concepts and measures of masculinity. Sex Roles, 50, 15-26. DOI: 10.1023/B:SERS.0000011069.02279.4c
• Smiler, A. (2006). Conforming to Masculine Norms: Evidence for Validity among Adult Men and Women, Sex Roles, 54, 767-775. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-006-9045-8
• Swim, J. K. & Cohen, L. L. (1997). Overt, covert, and subtle sexism, A comparison between the attitudes toward women and modern sexism scales. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 103-118.doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00103.x
• Thompson, E. H., & Pleck, J. H. (1986). The structure of males role norms. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 531-543.
• Thompson, E. H. & Pleck, J. H. (1995). Masculinities ideologies: A review of research instrumentation on men and masculinities. In R. F. Levant & W.S. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 129-163). New York: Basic Books.
• Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. & Joly, S. (1995). Neosexim: Plus ça change, Plus c'est pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 842-849. doi: 10.1177/0146167295218007
• Twenge, J. M. (1999). Mapping gender: The multifactorial approach and the organization of genderrelated attributes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 591-605.doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00377.x
• Wade, J. & Brittan-Powell, C. (2001). Professional men's attitudes toward race and gender equity: The importance of masculinity ideology, genderrelated traits, and reference group identity dependence. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 2, 42-50.Doi: 10.3149/jms.1001.73
• Williams, R. & Wittig, M. (1997). I'm not a feminist, but...": factors contributing to the discrepancy between profeminist orientation and feminist social identity. Sex Roles, 37, 885-904.DOI: 10.1007/BF02936345