Practical Experiences for the Development of Educational Systems in the Semantic Web

  1. Sánchez Vera, María del Mar
  2. Fernández Breis, Jesualdo Tomás
  3. Serrano Sánchez, José Luis
  4. Prendes Espinosa, María Paz
Revista:
NAER: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research

ISSN: 2254-7339

Año de publicación: 2013

Volumen: 2

Número: 1

Páginas: 23-31

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.7821/NAER.2.1.23-31 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: NAER: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

En los últimos años las tecnologías de la Web Semántica se han aplicado en entornos educativos para diferentes propósitos. El tipo de aplicación se ha definido principalmente por cómo el conocimiento se ha representado y difundido. La tecnología básica para la representación del conocimiento en la Web Semántica es la ontología. Ésta representa un punto de vista común, compartido y reutilizable, de un dominio de aplicación concreto. Las ontologías pueden servir de apoyo para diversas actividades en entornos educativos, y pueden ser una herramienta muy utilizada desde el punto de vista pedagógico. En este artículo nos centramos en dos experiencias que utilizan las tecnologías de la Web Semántica en entornos educativos: la plataforma OeLE, que utiliza ontologías como apoyo a los procesos de evaluación (que tienen que estar diseñadas e implementadas en lenguajes semánticos que puedan ser utilizados por OeLE); y el proyecto ENSEMBLE, que pretende desarrollar aplicaciones de la Web Semántica al crear representaciones de conocimiento específicas desde las necesidades del usuario. Vamos a analizar, por tanto, el papel de las ontologías y cómo se pueden utilizar de diferentes modos comparando las pautas de modelos y analizando cómo las ontologías pueden complementarse mutuamente y sus implicaciones para la práctica.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alfonseca, E., & Perez, D. (October ,2004). Automatic assessment of open ended questions with a bleu-inspired algorithm and shallow nlp. In Proceedings of Advances in Natural Language Processing, 4th International Conference, EsTAL, Alicante, Spain, pp. 25-35.
  • Amorín, R., Lama, M., Sánchez E., Riera, A., & Vila, X. A. (1995). A learning design ontology based on the IMS specification. In R. Koper, C. Tattersall, & D. Burgos (Eds.) (2005), Current State on IMS Learning Design. Proceedings of the UNFOLD/Prolearn Joint Workshop, 1, 203-225, Vlakenburg.
  • Avilés, K., Diaz-Kommonen, L., Laipainen, M., & Pietarila, J. (2003). Soft Ontologies and Similarity Cluster Tools to facilitate Exploration and Discovery of Cultural Heritage Resources. IEEE Computer Society Digital Library. Czech Republic: DEXA 2003.
  • Berners, T., & Hendler, J. (2001). Sicentific publishing on the Semantic Web. In Nature. doi:10.1038/35074206
  • Birenbaum, M., Tatsuoka, K., & Gutvirtz, Y. (1992). Effects of response format on diagnostic assessment of scholastic achievement. Applied psychological measurement, 16(4). doi:10.1177/014662169201600406
  • Bittencourt I., Costa E., Silva M., & Soares, E. (2009). A computational model for developing semantic web-based educational systems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 22(4), 302-315. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2009.02.012
  • Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classificaction of educational goals. Handbook I, cognitive domain. Toronto: Longman.
  • Bouquet, P., Dona, A., Serafini, L., & Zanobini, S. (2002). Contextualized local ontologies specification via CTXML. AAAI-02 workshop on Meaning Negociation, 28, 200-2.
  • Brewster, C., & O'Hara, K., (2007). Knowledge representation with ontologies: Present challenges-future possibilities. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(7), 563-688. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.04.003
  • Corcho, O., Fernández, M., & Gómez, A. (2003). Methodologies, tools and languages for builing ontologies. Where is their meeting point?. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 46(1), 41-64. doi:10.1016/S0169-023X(02)00195-7
  • Devedzic, V. (2006). Semantic Web and Education. Springer’s Integrated Series in Information Systems. USA: Springer.
  • Devin, C. (1998). Panlingua. Retrieved from http://www.strout.net/info/science/ai/panlingua/intro.html
  • Falquet, G., & Mottaz, C. (2004). Ontology based interfaces to access a library of virtual hyperbooks. In R. Heery & L. Lyon (Eds.), ECDL, 3232, of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 99-110.
  • Fensel, D., Staab, S., Studer, R., van Harmelen, F., & Davies, J., (2003). Towards the Semantic Web. In J. Wiley & L.C. Sons. (Eds.), A Future Perspective: Exploiting Peer-to-Peer and the Semantic Web for Knowledge Management, 245-264.
  • Fernández, J., Prendes, M. P., Castellanos, D., Martínez, F., Valencia, R., & Ruíz, J. (2007). Evaluación en e-learning basada en tecnologías de la Web semántica y procesamiento del lenguaje natural. Murcia: Diego Marín.
  • Fernández-Breis, J. T., & Martínez-Béjar, R. (2002). A cooperative framework for integrating ontologies. International Journal Human-Computer Studies, 56(6), 665-667. doi:10.1006/ijhc.2002.1010
  • Friedler, S., A., & Shneiderman, B. (2008). Enabling teachers to explore grade patterns to identify individual needs and promote fairer student assessment. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1467-1485. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.01.005
  • Gordijn, J., & Nijhof, W. (2002). Effects of complex feedback on computer- assisted modular instruction. Computers and Education, 39, 183-200. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00025-8
  • Gruber, T. (1993). Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. In Technical Report KSL (pp. 93-104). Stanford University: Knowledge Systems Laboratory.
  • Horridge, M. (2009). A practical guide to building OWL Ontologies Using Protegé 4 and CO-ODE Tools. Edition 1.2. University of Manchester. Retrieved from http://owl.cs.manchester.ac.uk/tutorials/protegeowltutorial/
  • Huynh, D, F., Karger, D. R., & Miller, R. C. (2008). Exhibit: Lightweight structured dada publishing. Retrieved from http://people.csail.mit.edu/dfhuynh/research/papers/www2007-%C2%AD%E2%80%90exhibit.pdf
  • Maicher, L., & Park, J. (Eds.), (2005). Charting the Topic Maps Research and Applications Landscape. Springer.
  • Martínez, A., Morris, S., Tracy, F., & Carmichael, P. (2011). Case Based Learning, Pedagogical Innovation and Semantic Web Technologies. IEEE transactions. Learning Technologies, 10(10).
  • McGrath, P. (2003). Assessing Students: Computer Simulation vs MCQs. In Proceedings of the 7th Computer Assisted Assessment Conference.
  • Mitchell, T., Aldridge, N., Williamson, W., & Broomhead, P. (2003). Computer based testing of medial knowledge. In Proceedings of the 7th Computer Assisted Assessment Conference.
  • Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology. Stanford Kwnoledge System Laboratory Technical Report and Stanford Medical Informative Technical Report, SMI 2001-0880. Retrieved from http://protege.stanford.edu/publications/ontology_development/ontology101.pdf
  • Olsen, M. B. (1998). Translating english and mandarin verbs with argument structure. Tech. rep., New Mexico State University.
  • Palmer, K., & Richardson, P. (2003). On-line assessment and free-response input: a pedagogic and technical model for squaring the circle. In Proceedings of the 7th Computer Assisted Assessment Conference.
  • Stojanovic, L., Staab, S., & Studer, R. (2001). E-Learning based on the Semantic Web. In WebNET 2001. Retrieved from http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/WBS/Publ/2001/WebNet_lstsstrst_2001.pdf
  • Tiropanis, T., Davis, H., Millard, D., WeaL, M., Wills, G., & White, S. (2009). Linked data as a Foundation for the deployment of Semantic applications in Higher Education. In SWEL09: Ontologies and social Semantic Web for Intelligent Educational Systems AIED09 Conference. Brighton, UK.
  • Tscholl, M., Tracy, F., & Carmichael, P. (2009, September). Case Methods, Pedagogical Innovation and Semantic Technologies. In 1st International Workshop on Semantic Web Applications for Learning and Teaching Support in Higher Education (SemHE'09) ECTEL'09, Nice, France. Retrieved from http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/18050/1/semhe09_submission_3.pdf
  • Van Heijst, G., Schereiber, A.T., & Wielinga, B. J. (1997). Using Explicit Ontologies in KBS Development. In International Journal of Human and Computer Studies, 47.
  • Wang, S., & Wu, P. (2008). The role of feedback and self-efficacy on web- based learning: The social cognitive perspective. Computers and Education, 51, 1589-1598.doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.03.004
  • Whittingdon, D., & Hunt, H. (1999). Approaches to the computerised assessment of free-text responses. In 3rd International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet