La percepción de las consonantes silábicas inglesas. Reglas y contextos fonémicos

  1. Arboleda Guirao, Inmaculada de Jesús
  2. Monroy Casas, Rafael
Journal:
Tonos digital: revista de estudios filológicos

ISSN: 1577-6921

Year of publication: 2010

Issue: 19

Type: Article

More publications in: Tonos digital: revista de estudios filológicos

Abstract

This is a study on the perception of English syllabic consonants vs. schwa in word final position at discourse level. In particular, we aim at finding out whether the listeners� perception of the behaviour of these phonemes differs in the different rules and phonemic contexts such phonemes occur. For this purpose, we explore the degree of dis/agreement amongst the referees and the factors which may have an influence on this degree of dis/agreement. The informants were 80 non-rhotic English newsreaders (40 males and 40 females) from the BBC Learning English website. Three females identified schwa/syllabic in 800 words. The statistical procedure used was the contingency table analysis. The results reveal that there are considerable differences in the different rules and phonemic contexts as far as the syllabic consonant vs. schwa perception is concerned. A more comprehensive approach would involve a wider sample of both informants and listeners as well as an exploration of perception in view of emphasis, accent and speaking rate.

Bibliographic References

  • ALVAREZ GONZÁLEZ, J. Syllabic and Non-syllabic /l/ and /n/. Atlantis, 1980, vol. 2, nº1, p. 41-48.
  • BBC Learning English Website, 2009 [Consulta 8 Noviembre, 2009 en WWW.BBC.CO.UK/WORLDSERVICE/LEARNINGENGLISH/INDEX.SHTML]
  • DIEHL, R.L., LOTTO, A.J., HOLT, L.L. Speech Perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 2004, vol. 55, p. 149-179.
  • GARCÍA, E. The Perception of Lateral Versus Nasal Syllabic Resonants. Nueva York: Laboratorios Haskins, 2006 [Consulta 15 Noviembre, 2009 en HTTP://WWW.HASKINS.YALE.EDU/SR/SR013/SR013_06.PDF]
  • LEHISTE, I. Acoustical Characteristics of Selected English Consonants. International Journal of American linguistics, 1964, vol. 30, nº3, p. 194-197.
  • MONROY CASAS, R. La Pronunciación del Inglés RP para Hablantes de Español. Madrid: Paraninfo, 1980.
  • MONROY CASAS, R. Fonética Inglesa [Presentación de Power Point]. Murcia: Universidad de Murcia, 2008-2009.
  • REESE, H.W. & LIPSITT, L.P. (Eds.). Advances in Child Development and Behaviour, vol. 13. Academic Press: Nueva York, 1979.
  • ROACH, P. English Phonetics and Phonology: A Practical Course. Cambridge: C.U.P, 1987.
  • ROACH, P. English Phonetics and Phonology: A Practical Course. Cambridge: C.U.P, 2000.
  • SHAEFFER, N. & EICHORN, N. The Effects of Differential Vowel Prolongations on Perceptions of Speech Naturalness. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 2001, vol. 26, nº4, p. 335-348.
  • TÖFT, Z. The Phonetics and Phonology of Some Syllabic Consonants in Southern British English. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 2002, vol. 28, p. 111–44.
  • TRASK, R.L. Dictionary of Phonetics and Phonology. Londres & Nueva York: Routledge, 1996.
  • VAN BERGEM, D. R. On the Perception of Acoustic and Lexical Vowel Reduction. Eurospeech ’93, 1993, p. 677-680.
  • VAN BERGEM, D. R. Perceptual and Acoustic Aspects of Lexical Vowel Reduction, a Sound Change in Progress. Speech Communication, 1995, vol.16, nº4, p. 329-358.
  • XIAONAN, S.S. & MAOCAN, L. Concept of Tone in Mandarin Revisited: A Perceptual Study on Tonal Coarticulation. Language Sciences, 1992, vol. 13, nºs 3-4, p. 421-432.