Determinantes sobre la evaluación en torno a los comportamientos de venta étnicamente cuestionables

Références bibliographiques

• AKAAH, I.P. (1989): «Differences in researchethics judgments between male and female marketing professionals». Journal of Business Ethics, nº 8, pp. 375-381.
• AL-KHATIB, J., RAWWAS, M.Y.A., SWAIDAN,Z. YREXEISEN, R.J. (2005): «The EthicalChallenges of Global Business-to-Business Negotiations: An Empirical Investigation of Developing Countries Marketing Managers». Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, nº 13, pp. 46-60.
• ALLSOP, J., EYSENCK, H.J. y EYSENCK,S.B.G. (1991): «Machiavellianism as a componentin psychoticism and extraversion». Personalityand Individual Differences, nº 12, pp. 29-41.
• ALTEMEYER, B. (2004): «Highly Dominating, Highly Authoritarian Personalities». The Journal of Social Psychology,nº 144, pp. 421-447.
• ARONSON, E. (2001): «Integrating leadership styles and ethical perspectives», Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, nº 18, pp. 244-256.
• BABIN, B.J., GRIFFIN, M. y BOLES, J.S. (2004):«Buyer reactions to ethical beliefs in the retail environment”». Journal of Business Research, nº 57,pp. 1155–1163.
• BARTOL, K.M. (1976): «Relationship of Sex and Professional Training Area to Job Orientation».Journal of Applied Psychology, nº 61, pp. 368-370.
• BATEMAN, C. y VALENTINE, S. (2010): «Investigating the Effects of Gender on Consumers’Moral Philosophies and Ethical Intentions».Journal of Business Ethics, nº 95, pp. 393-404.
• BELK, R.W. (1984): «Cultural and historical differences in concept of self and their effects on attitudes towards having and living». Advances in Consumer Research, nº 11, pp. 753-760.
• BELK, R.W. (1988): «Third World Consumer Culture», Research in Marketing, nº 4, pp. 102-107.
• BELLIZZI, J.A. y HASTY, R.W. (1998): «Student perceptions of questionable personal selling practices». Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, nº 12, pp. 218-226.
• BERENGUER,G., GIL, I. y RUIZ, M.E. (2008): «Segmentación de clientes del comercio minorista en función de los beneficios de la relación minorista/consumidor». Información Comercial Española. Revista de Economía, nº 844, pp. 219-236.
• CHRISTIE, R. y GEIS F.L. (1970): Studies in Machiavellianism. Ed. Academic Press, New York.
• DE BRUYN, A., LIECHTY, J.L., HUIZINGH, E.K.R.E. y LILIEN, G.L. (2008): «Offering On-line Recommendations with Minimum CustomerInput Through Conjoint Based Decision Aids».Marketing Science, nº 27, pp. 443-464.
• ERFFEMEYER, R. C., KEILLOR., B.D. yLECLAIR, D.T. (1999): «An empirical investiga-tion of Japanese consumer ethics». Journal ofBusiness Ethics, nº 18, pp. 35-50.
• FERRELL, O.C. y GRESHAM, L.G. (1985): «A Contingency Framework for understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing», Journal of Marketing, nº 49, pp. 87-96.
• FORSYTH, D.R. (1980): «A Taxonomy of Ethical Ideologies», Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, nº 39, pp. 175-184.
• FORSYTH, D.R. y BERGER, R.E. (1982): «The effects of ethical ideology on moral behaviour». The Journal of Social Psychology, nº 117, pp. 53-56.
• FORSYTH, D.R. (1992): «Judging the Morality of Business Practices: The Influence of Personal Moral Philosophies». Journal of Business Ethics, nº 11,pp. 461–470.
• FULLERTON, S., KERCH, K.B. y DODGE, H.R.(1996): «Consumer ethics: An assessment of individual behavior in the market place». Journal ofBusiness Ethics. nº 15, pp. 805-814.
• GUNDLACH, G.T. y MURPHY, P.E. (1993):«Ethical and legal foundations of relational marketing exchanges». Journal of Marketing, nº 57, pp. 35-46.
• GUNNTHORSDOTTIR, A., MCCABE, K. y SMITH, V. (2002): «Using the Machiavellianism Instrument to Predict Trustworthiness in a Bargaining Game». Journal of Economic Psychology,nº 23, pp. 49–66.
• HAIR, J.F., ANDERSON, R.E., TATHAM, R.L. y BLACK, W. C. (1999): Análisis Multivariante. Ed. Prentice Hall, Madrid.
• HARRELL, W.A. y HARTNAGEL, T. (1976): «The impact of Machiavellianism and the truthfulness of the victim on laboratory theft». Sociometry, nº 39, pp. 157-165.
• HUNT, S.D. y CHONKO, L.B. (1984): «Marketing and Machiavellianism». Journal of Marketing, nº48, pp. 30-42.
• HUNT, S.D. y VITELL, S.J. (1986): «A General Theory of Marketing Ethics». Journal of Macromarketing, nº6, pp. 5-16.
• HUNT, S.D. y VITELL, S.J. (1993): «The General Theory of Marketing Ethics: A Retrospective and Revision». Ethics in Marketing(Irwin Inc., Homewood, IL), pp. 775-784.
• INGRAM, R., SKINNER, S.J y TAYLOR, V.A.(2005): «Consumers’ Evaluations of Unethical Marketing Behaviors: The Role of Customer Commitment». Journal of Business Ethics, nº62, pp. 237-252.
• KARKOULIAN, S, SAMHAT, A y MESSARRA, L.(2010): «The relationship between machiavellianism and career development». Journal of Organizational Culture, Communication and Conflict, nº 14; pp. 1-12.
• KENG, K.A., KWON, J., TAN S.J. y JOCHEN, W.(2000): «The Influence of Materialistic Inclinationon Values, Life Satisfaction, and Aspirations: An Empirical Analysis». Social Indicators Research,nº 49, pp. 317–333.
• KOHLBERG, L. (1981): Essays in Moral Development, Volume 1: The Philosophy of Moral Development. Ed. Harper and Row, New York.
• KOLODINSKY, R.W., MADDEN, T.M., ZISK,D.S. y HENKEL, E.T. (2009): «Attitudes About Corporate Social Responsibility: Business Student Predictors». Journal of Business Ethics, nº91,pp.167-181.
• KÜSTER, I. y ROMÁN, S. (2006): Venta personal y dirección de ventas: la fidelización del cliente. Ed. Thomson-Paraninfo, Madrid.
• LAGACE, R. R., DAHLSTROM, R. y GASSEN-HEIMER, J. B. (1991): «The Relevance of Ethical Salesperson Behavior on Relationship Quality: The Pharmaceutical Industry». Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, nº11, pp.39-47.
• LANE, J.C. (1995): «Ethics of business students: Some marketing perspectives». Journal of Business Ethics, nº 14, pp. 571-580.
• LEARY. M.R., KNIGHT, P.D. y BARNES, B.D.(1986): «Ethical ideologies of the Machiavellian». Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, nº12,pp. 75-80.
• LEVY, M. y SHARMA, A. (1994): «Adaptive selling: The role of gender, age, sales experience, and education». Journal of Business Research, nº 31,pp. 39-47.
• LÓPEZ, J.A., SANTOS, M.L. y TRESPALACIOS,J.A. (2010): «Perspectivas de análisis en la creación de valor para el cliente en las relaciones comprador/vendedor: un estudio empírico». Información Comercial Española. Revista de Economía, nº 854, pp. 123-147.
• MCINTYRE, F.S., THOMAS J.L. y GILBERT, F.W.(1999): «Consumer Segments and Perceptions of Retail Ethics». Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, nº2, pp. 43–53.
• MOLINER, B. y BERENGUER, G. (2010): «La lealtad como base de segmentación de clientes en el comercio minorista». Información Comercial Española. Revista de Economía. nº 855, pp. 139-152.
• MUNCY, J.A. y VITELL, S.J. (1992): «Consumer Ethics: An Investigation of the Ethical Beliefs ofthe Final Consumer». Journal of Business Research, nº 24, pp. 297-311.
• MUNCY, J.A. y EASTMAN, J.K. (1998): «Materialism and consumer ethics: an exploratory study».Journal of Business Ethics, nº 17, pp. 137-45.
• NUNNALLY, J.C. (1978): Psycometric Theory.Ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
• O’BRIAN, B. (1999): «Prudential fine $20 million by NASD over its sales of variable life insurance». Wall Street J, nº9, pp. 1-11.
• POMEROY, A. (2005): «Are Women More Ethical Than Men». HR Magizine, nº 12.
• RAMSEY, R.P., MARSHALL, G.W., JOHNS-TON, M.W y DEETER-SCHMELZ, D.R. (2007):«Ethical Ideologies and Older Consumer Perceptions of Unethical Sales Tactics». Journal of Business Ethics, nº 70, pp. 191–207.
• RAWWAS, M.Y.A., SWAIDAN, Z. y OYMAN,M. (2005). "Consumer Ethics: A Cross-Cultural Study of the Ethical Beliefs of Turkish and American Consumers". Journal of Business Ethics, nº 57, pp. 183-195.
• REIDENBACH, R. E., ROBIN, D. y DAWSON,L. E. (1991): «An application and extension of multidimensional ethics scale to selected marketing practices and marketing groups». Journal of marketing science, nº 19, pp. 83-92.
• REST, J.R., y THOMA, S. (1985): «The relationof moral judgment to formal education». Developmental Psychology,nº 21, pp. 709-714.
• REST, J.R. (1986): Moral Development: Advancesin Research and Theory. Ed. Praeger, Nueva York.
• RICHINS, M.L. y DAWSON, S.A. (1992): «Consumer Values Orientation for Materialism and Its Measurement: Scale Development and Validation».Journal of Consumer Research, nº 19, pp. 303-316.
• ROBINSON, J.P. y SHAVER, P.R. (1973): Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes, Ed. Ann Arbor. MI: Institute for Social Research.
• ROMÁN, S. (2003): «The impact of ethical sales behaviour on customer satisfaction, trust and loyalty to the company: An empirical study in the financial services industry». Journal of Marketing Management, nº 19, pp. 915- 949.
• ROMÁN, S. y MUNUERA, J.L. (2005): «Determinants and consequences of ethical behaviour: an empirical study of sales people». European Journal of Marketing, nº 39, pp. 473-496.
• ROMÁN, S. y RUIZ, S. (2005): «Relationship Outcomes of Perceived Ethical Sales Behavior: The Customer’s Perspective». Journal of Business Research, nº 58, pp. 439–445.
• ROSS, W.T. y ROBERTSON, D.C. (2003): «A Typology of Situational Factors: Impact on Sales person Decision Making about Ethical Issues».Journal of Business Ethics, nº 46, pp. 213–234.
• ROXAS, M.L. y STONEBACK, J.Y. (2004): «The Importance of gender Across Cultures in Ethical Decision making». Journal of Business Ethics, nº50, pp. 149.
• RUDMIN, F. y RICHINS, M. (1992): «Meaning, Measure, and Morality of Materialism». Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT, pp. 14-30.
• SAN MARTÍN, S., GUTIÉRREZ, J. y CAMARERO, Mº. C. (2005):«Oportunismo y confianza en las relaciones empresa-consumidor». Cuadernos de economía y dirección de empresa, nº23,pp. 031-060.
• SCHULER, R.S. (1975): «Sex, Organizational Leveland Outcome Importance: Where the DifferencesAre». Personnel Psychology, nº 28, pp. 362-375.
• SCHWEPKER C.H. y GOOD D.J. (1999): «Theimpact of sales quotas on moral judgment in the financial services industry». The Journal of Services Marketing, nº 13, pp. 38-58.
• SIKULA, A.S. y COSTA, A.D. (1994): «Are age and ethics related?». The Journal of Psychology,nº 6, pp. 659- 689.
• SINGHAPAKDI, A. y VITELL, S.J. (1991): «Analyzing the Ethical Decision Making of Sales Professionals». The Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, nº 11, pp.1-12.
• SINGHAPAKDI, A. y VITELL, S.J. (1993):«Personal and Professional Values Underlying the Ethical Judgments of Marketers», Journal of Business Ethics, nº 12, pp. 525-533.
• SINGHAPAKDI, A., VITELL, S.J. y FRANKE,G.R. (1999): «Antecedents, consequences, and mediating effects of perceived moral intensity and personal moral philosophies». Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, nº 27, pp. 19-36.
• TANSEY, R., BROWN, G., HYMAN, MICHAEL,R., DAWSON y LYNDON, E. (1994):«Personal moral philosophies and the moral judgments of sales-people», The Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, nº14, pp. 59-75.
• VAN KENHOVE, P., VERMEIR, I. y VERNIERS,S. (2001): «An empirical investigation of the relationships between ethical beliefs, ethical ideology, political preference and need for closure». Journalof Business Ethics, nº32, pp. 347-362.
• VERMEIR, I. y VAN KENHOVE, P. (2008): «Gender Differences in Double Standards». Journal of Business Ethics,nº 81, pp. 281-295.
• VITELL, S.J. y MUNCY, J. (1992): «Consumer Ethics: An Empirical Investigation of Factors Influencing Ethical Judgments of the Final Consumer».Journal of Business Ethics, nº 11, pp. 585-597.
• VITELL, S.J., NWACHUKWU, S.L. y BARNES, J.H. (1993): «The Effects of Culture on Ethical Decision-Making, An Application of Hofstede’s Typology». Journal of Business Ethics, nº12, pp. 753-760.
• VITELL, S.J. (2003): «Consumer ethics research: Review, synthesis and suggestions for the future».Journal of Business Ethics, nº 43, pp. 33-47.
• WILSON, D.S., NEAR, D. y MILLER, R.R. (1996): «Machiavellianism: A Synthesis of Evolutionary and Psychological Literatures». Psychological Bulletin, nº 119, pp. 285-299.
• WOTRUBA, T.R. (1990): «A Comprehensive Framework for the Analysis of Ethical Behavior With a Focus on Sales Organizations». Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, nº10, pp. 29-42.