Factores anaeróbicos predictores del éxito en lucha olímpica

  1. Martínez Abellán, Alberto
  2. García Pallarés, Jesús
  3. López Gullón, José María
  4. Muriel Otegui, Xavier
  5. Morales Baños, Vicente
  6. Martínez Moreno, Alfonso
Revista:
Cuadernos de psicología del deporte

ISSN: 1578-8423,  1989-5879

Ano de publicación: 2010

Título do exemplar: Monográfico Ciencias de la Actividad Física y Deportes

Volume: 10

Número: 2

Páxinas: 17-24

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

Outras publicacións en: Cuadernos de psicología del deporte

Resumo

This study was undertaken to establish the relationship between anaerobic metabolism (anaerobic power and anaerobic capacity) and success in wrestling. Thirty seven male Free- Style and Greco-Roman wrestlers took part in this study, body mass ranged between 68-84 kg. According to the performance level, all the wrestlers were divided into two groups: Elite (n = 18) and Amateur (n = 19). All the subjects performed a 30 s Wingate test on a SRM Indoor Trainer cycle ergometer (Schoberer Rad Meßtechnik, Germany) that was specifically modified for the standing crank-arm. The height of the arm ergometer.�s central axis and crank arm length were adjusted to optimize the test mean power. The mean and peak power, the fatigue index as well as the peak blood lactate ([La-]peak) were established at the end of the test. The elite group showed significant higher (P > 0.05) values in all the Wingate studied variables compared to the amateur group (Peak power: Elite 781±154 W, Amateur 643±140 W; Mean power: Elite 523±83, Amateur 433±78 W; [La-]peak: Elite 10.7±2.0 mmol·l-1, Amateur 9.2±1.9 mmol·l-1), except the fatigue index results where no significant differences were detected (Elite 2.22±0.33, Amateur 2.29±0.57). These findings suggest that the upper body anaerobic performance is a critical success factor in wrestling. On the other hand, the power declines detected during the maximum 30 seconds test does not seem to be related to the wrestling performance.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aschenbach W, Ocel J, Craft L, Ward C, Spangenburg E, Williams J. Effect of oral sodium loading on high-intensity arm ergometry in college wrestlers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32(3): 669-75.
  • Bar-Or O. The Wingate anaerobic test. An update on methodology, reliability and validity. Sports Med. 1987; 4(6): 381-94.
  • Borkowski L, Faff J, Starczewska-Czapowska J, Zdanowicz R (1999). Physical fitness of the Polish elite wrestlers. Biol Sport, 16, 203-215.
  • Coyle EF, Costill DL, Lesmes GR. (1979)Leg extension power and muscle fiber composition. Med Sci Sports. Spring; 11(1): 12-5.
  • Durnin JVGA, Womersley J. (1974)Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. Br J Nutr, 32, 77-97.
  • Horswill CA, Scott JR, Galea P (1989). Comparison of maximum aerobic power, maximum anaerobic power, and skinfold thickness of elite and nonelite junior wrestlers. Int J Sports Med. 10(3) 165-8.
  • Horswill CA. (1992). Applied physiology of amateur wrestling. Sports Med., 14(2): 114-43.
  • Hübner-Wo niak E, Kosmol A, Lutoslawska G, Bem EZ. (2004). Anaerobic performance of arms and legs in male and female free style wrestlers. J Sci Med Sport. 7(4), 473-80.
  • International Federation of Associated Wrestling Styles. International Wrestling Rules [online]. 2009. Available from URL: [Accessed 29.06.2010].
  • Jobson SA, Passfield L, Atkinson G, Barton G, Scarf P (2009). The analysis and utilization of cycling training data. Sports Med, 39(10): 833-44.
  • Karnincic H, Tocilj Z, Uljevic O, Erceg M. (2009). Lactate profile during greco-roman wrestling match. J Sports Sci Med, 8(CSSI 3): 17-19.
  • Kraemer WJ, Fry AC, Rubin MR, Triplett-McBride T, Gordon SE, Koziris LP, Lynch JM, Volek JS, Meuffels DE, Newton RU, Fleck SJ (2001). Physiological and performance responses to tournament wrestling. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 33(8): 1367-78.
  • Marfell-Jones M, Olds T, Stewart AD, Carter L (2006). International Standards for Anthropometric Assessment. Potchefstroom (South Africa): International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK). p. 61–75.
  • Mirzaei B, Curby DG, Rahmani-Nia F, Moghadasi M. (2009). Physiological profile of elite Iranian junior freestyle wrestlers. J Strength Cond Res, 23(8): 2339-44.
  • Neville V, Pain MT, Kantor J, Folland JP. (2010). Influence of crank length and crank-axle height on standing arm-crank (grinding) power. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 42(2): 381-7.
  • Sharratt MT, Taylor AW, Song TM. (1986). A physiological profile of elite Canadian freestyle wrestlers. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 11(2): 100-5.
  • Sharratt MT. (1984). Wrestling profile. Clin Sports Med, 3: 273-289.
  • Silva JM 3rd, Shultz BB, Haslam RW, Murray D. (1981). A psychophysiological assessment of elite wrestlers. Res Q Exerc Sport. 52(3): 348-58.
  • Siri WE.(1961). Body composition from fluid spaces and density: analysis of methods. En: Brozeck J, Henschel A (eds.): Techniques for measuring body composition. Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences. Natural Resourcer Council. 223-244.
  • Song TM, Garvie GT. (1980) Anthropometric, flexibility, strength, and physiological measures of Canadian wrestlers and comparison of Canadian and Japanese Olympic wrestlers. Can J Appl Sport Sci. Mar; 5(1): 1-8.
  • Stine G, Ratliff R, Shierman G, Grana WA. (1979)Physical profile of the wrestlers at the 1977 NCAA Championships. Physician Sportsmed. 7: 98-105
  • Vardar SA, Tezel S, Öztürk L, Kaya O. (2007). The relationship between body composition and anaerobic performance of elite young wrestlers. J Sports Sci Med. 6(CSSI-2): 34-38.
  • Yoon J. (2002). Physiological profiles of elite senior wrestlers. Sports Med. 32(4): 225-33.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet