The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depressiona meta-analytic reliability generalization study

Bibliographic References

• Addington, D., Addington, J., and Atkinson, M. (1996). A psychometric comparison of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Schizophrenia Research, 19, 205-212.
• Addington, D., Addington, J., Maticka-Tyndale, E., and Joyce, J. (1992). Reliability and validity of a depression rating scale for schizophrenics. Schizophrenia Research, 6, 201-208.
• Addington, D., Addington, J., and Schissel, B. (1990). A depression rating scale for schizophrenics. Schizophrenia Research, 3, 247-251.
• Akdemir, A., Türkçapar, M.H., Örsel, S.D., Demirergi, N., Dag, I., and Özbay, M.H. (2001). Reliability ad validity of the Turkish Version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 42, 161-165.
• Bech, P. and Allerup, P. (1981). The Hamilton Depression Scale: Evaluation and selectivity using logistic models. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 63, 290-299.
• Bech, P., Allerup, P., Reisby, N., and Gram, L.F. (1984). Assessment of symptom change from improvement curves on the Hamilton Depression Scale in trials with antidepressants. Psychopharmacology, 84, 276-281.
• Bech, P., Lunde, M., and Undén, M. (2002). Social Adaptation Self-evaluation Scale (SASS): Psychometric analysis as outcome measure in the treatment of patients with major depression in the remission phase. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 6, 141-146.
• Bech, P., Stage, K.B., Nair, N.P.V., Larsen, J.K., Kragh-Sørensen, P., and Gjerris, A. (1997). The Major Depression Rating Scale (MDS). Inter-rater reliability and validity across different settings in randomized moclobemide trials. Journal of Affective Disorders, 42, 39-48.
• Bent-Hamsen, J., Lunde, M., Klysner, R., Andersen, M., Tanghøj, P., Solstad, K., and Bech, P. (2003). The validity of the Depression Rating Scale in discriminating between citalopram and placebo in depression recurrence in the maintenance therapy of elderly unipolar patients with major depression. Pharmacopsychiatry, 36, 313-316.
• Bentz, B.G. and Hall, J.R. (2008). Assessment of depression in a geriatric inpatient cohort: A comparison of the BDI and GDS. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 8, 93-104.
• Beretvas, S.N. and Pastor, D.A. (2003). Using mixed-effects models in reliability generalization studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 75-95.
• Bobes, J., Bulbena, A., Luque, A., Dal-Ré, R., Ballesteros, J., Ibarra, N., and Grupo de Validación en Español de Escalas Psicométricas (GVEEP) (2003). Evaluación psicométrica comparativa de las versiones en español de 6, 17, 21 ítems de la Escala de valoración de Hamilton para la evaluación de la depresión. Medicina Clínica, 120, 693-700.
• Botella, J. and Gambara, H. (2006). Doing and reporting a meta-analysis. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 6, 425-440.
• Cabañero-Martínez, M.J., Cabrero-García, J., Richart-Martínez, M., Muñoz-Mendoza, C.L., and Reig-Ferrer, A. (2007). Revisión estructurada de las escalas de depresión en personas mayores. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7, 823-846.
• Cole, J.C., Motivala, S.J., Dang, J., Lucko, A., Lang, N., Levin, M.J., Oxman, M.N., and Irwin, M.R. (2004). Structural validation of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 241-254.
• Dimitrov, D.M. (2002). Reliability: Arguments for multiple perspectives and potential problems with generalization across studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 783-801.
• Feldt, L.S. and Charter, R.A. (2006). Averaging internal consistency reliability coefficients. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 215-227.
• Fuglum, E., Rosenberg, C., Damsbo, N., Stage, K., Lauritzen, L., Bech, P., and Danish University Antidepressant Group (1996). Screening and treating depressed patients. A comparison of two controlled citalopram trials across treatment settings: Hospitalized patients vs. patients treated by their family doctors. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 94, 18-25.
• Gelenberg, A.J., Wojcik, J.D., Falk, W.E., Baldessarini, R.J., Zeisel, S.H., Schoenfeld, D., and Mok, G.S. (1990). Tyrosine for depression: A double-blind trial. Journal of Affective Disorders, 19, 125-132.
• Gibbons R.D., Clark, D.C., and Kupfer, D.J. (1993). Exactly what does the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale measure. Journal of Psychiatry Research, 27, 259-273.
• Hamilton, M. (1960). A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 23, 56-62.
• Hammond, M. (1998). Rating depression severity in the elderly physically ill patient: Reliability and factor structure of the Hamilton and the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scales. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 13, 257-261.
• Hedges, L.V. (1994). Fixed effects models. In H. Cooper and L.V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 285-299). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
• Henson, R.K. and Thompson, B. (2002). Characterizing measurement error in scores across studies: Some recommendations for conducting «reliability generalization» studies. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 35, 113-127.
• Higgins, J.P.T. and Thompson, S.G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539-1558.
• Kieffer, K.M. and Reese, R.J. (2002). A reliability generalization study of the Geriatric Depression Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 969-994.
• Kobak, K.A. and Reynolds, W.M. (2000). The Hamilton Depression Inventory. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), Handbook of psychological assessment in primary care settings (pp. 423-461). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Leach, L.F., Henson, R.K., Odom, L.R., and Cagle, L.S. (2006). A reliability generalization study of the Self-Description Questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 285-304.
• Leidy, N.K., Palmer, C., Murray, M., Robb, J., and Revicki, D.A. (1998). Health-related quality of life assessment in euthymic and depressed patients with bipolar disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 48, 207-214.
• Maier, W., Philipp, M., Heuser, I., Schlegel, S., Buller, R., and Wetzel, H. (1988). Improving depression severity assessment –I. Reliability, internal validity and sensitivity to change of three observer depression scales. Journal of Psychiatry Research, 22, 3-12.
• Mason, C., Allam, R., and Brannick, M.T. (2007). How to meta-analyze coefficient-of-stability estimates: Some recommendations based on Monte Carlo studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 765-783.
• Montero, I. and León, O.G. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7, 847-862.
• Nunnally, J. and Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• O´Rourke, N. (2004). Reliability generalization of responses by care providers to the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 973-990.
• Paykel, E.S. (1985). The Clinical Interview for Depression: Development, reliability and validity. Journal of Affective Disorders, 9, 85-96.
• Potts, M.K., Daniels, M., Burnam, A., and Wells, K.B. (1990). A structured interview version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: Evidence of reliability and versatility of administration. Journal of Psychiatry Research, 24, 335-350.
• Ramos, J.A. and Cordero, A. (1988). A new validation of the Hamilton Rating Scale for depression. Journal of Psychiatry Research, 22, 21-28.
• Rapp, S.R., Smith, S.S., and Britt, M. (1990). Identifying comorbid depression in elderly medical patients: Use of extracted Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 243-247.
• Reynolds, W.M. and Mazza, J.J. (1998). Reliability and validity of the Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale with young adolescents. Journal of School Psychology, 36, 295-312.
• Riskind, J.H., Beck, A.T., Brown, G., and Steer, R.A. (1987). Taking the measure of anxiety and depression. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 175, 474-479.
• Rodriguez, M.C. and Maeda, Y. (2006). Meta-analysis of coefficient alpha. Psychological Methods, 11, 306-322.
• Rosenthal, S.H. and Klerman, G.L. (1966). Endogenous features of depression in women. Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal, 11, 11-16.
• Rush, A.J., Giles, D.E., Schlesser, M.A., Fulton, C.L., Weissenburger, J., and Burns, C. (1986). The Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology (IDS): Preliminary findings. Psychiatry Research, 18, 65-87.
• Rush, A.J., Triverdi, M.H., Ibrahim, H.M., Carmody, T.J., Arnow, B., Klein, D.N., Markowitz, J.C., Ninan, P.T., Kornstein, S., Manber, R., Thase, M.E., Kocsis, J.H., and Keller, M.B. (2003). The 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), Clinician Rating (QIDS-C), and Self-Report(QIDS-SR): A psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biological Psychiatry, 54, 573-583.
• Sawilowsky, S.S. (2000). Psychometrics versus datametrics: Comment on Vacha-Haase’s ‘Reliability generalization’ method and some EPM editorial policies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 157-173.
• Stage, K.B., Middelboe, T., and Pisinger, C. (2003). Measurement of depression in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 57, 297-301.
• Terman, M. (1988). On the question of mechanism in phototherapy for seasonal affective disorder: Consideration of clinical efficacy and epidemiology. Journal of Biological Rhytms, 3, 155-172.
• Thase, M.E., Frank, E., Malinger, A.G., Hamer, T., and Kupfer, D.J. (1992). Treatment of imipramina-resistant recurrent depression, III: Efficacy of monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 53, 5-11.
• Thompson, B. (Ed.) (2003). Score reliability: Contemporary thinking on reliability issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Thompson, B. and Vacha-Haase, T. (2000). Psychometrics is datametrics: The test is not reliable. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 174-195.
• Thunedborg, K., Black, C.H., and Bech, P. (1995). Beyond the Hamilton Depression scores in long-term treatment of manic-melancholic patients: Prediction of recurrence of depression by quality of life measurements. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 64, 131-140.
• Vacha-Haase, T. (1998). Reliability generalization: Exploring variance in measurement error affecting score reliability across studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 6-20.
• Vacha-Haase, T., Kogan, L.R., and Thompson, B. (2000). Sample compositions and variabilities in published studies versus those in test manuals. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 509-522.
• Williams, J.B.W. (1988). A structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 45, 742-747.
• Williams, J.B.W., Link, M., Rosenthal, N.E., Amira, L., and Terman, M. (2000). Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-Seasonal Affective Disorder Version (SIGH-SAD). New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute.
• Yin, P. and Fan, X. (2000). Assessing the reliability of Beck Depression Inventory scores: Reliability generalization across studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 201-223.