Digestibilidad in vivo en cabra murciano-granadina de ensilados mixtos de tomate vs. ensilado de maíz
- MEGÍAS, M. D.
- HERNÁNDEZ, F.
- MARTÍNEZ-TERUEL, A.
- ORENGO, J.
- MARTÍNEZ, S.
- María Jesús Alcalde Aldea (coord.)
- Valentín Pérez Pérez (coord.)
- Raúl Bodas Rodríguez (coord.)
- Juan José Mateos Fernández (coord.)
- Manuel Sánchez Rodríguez (coord.)
Editorial: Sociedad Española de Ovinotecnia y Caprinotecnia SEOC
ISBN: 978-84-608-8680-8
Ano de publicación: 2016
Páxinas: 156-160
Congreso: Sociedad Española de Ovinotecnia y Caprinotecnia (SEOC). Jornadas (41. 2016. Talavera de la Reina - Toledo)
Tipo: Achega congreso
Resumo
The aim of this work was to study the in vivo digestibility two tomato silagescompared to corn silage. To do this, we used 5 adults and castrated goatbreed Murcia-Granada males. The tested silages were 3; Silage 1 (E1)consisting of tomato by-product and wheat straw used as an absorbent;Silage 2 (E2) of by-product tomato with a mixture of wheat straw, dried beetpulp and corn silage and, silage 3 (E3), consisting exclusively of forage corn.Silage has been made in silos-bag of 500 kg. In vivo digestibility of organicmatter (OMD) was lower (P <0.05) in the E1, compared to other treatments(49.54; 69.95; and 68.50% for E1, E2 and E3, respectively). In the case ofprotein, in vivo digestibility was the highest (P <0.05) for E2 with value of61.13 and, 41.28 and 52.13% for E1 and E3, respectively. In conclusion, thesilage 2 is an excellent forage alternative, a priori comparable to maizesilage, for the use of tomato by-product in small ruminants of high production.