Los contenidos de la formación continuada del profesorado¿Qué docentes se están formando?

  1. Juan Manuel Escudero Muñoz 1
  2. María Teresa González González 1
  3. María Jesús Rodríguez Entrena 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

Revista:
Educación XX1: Revista de la Facultad de Educación

ISSN: 1139-613X 2174-5374

Any de publicació: 2018

Volum: 21

Número: 1

Pàgines: 157-180

Tipus: Article

Altres publicacions en: Educación XX1: Revista de la Facultad de Educación

Resum

The contents of in-service teacher education are only one of the components of the teacher professional development programs. However, they are important and even decisive because they represent the knowledge base and the wisdom of the practice with which teachers are building their professional knowledge and practice. They make it possible to learn certain values and concepts, practical skills and dispositions that are necessary in order to understand and properly deal with teaching tasks and responsibilities. An updated specialized review on the contents of the training literature has allowed us to compose the theoretical framework used to conduct research on the in-service teacher training, in recent years, in various autonomous regions, Murcia included. The methodology has consisted of a survey type research where a total of 1,413 questionnaires have been collected from teachers who teach at the stage of compulsory schooling. After the analysis and discussion of the data, certain implications have emerged; on the one hand, they provide insight into what is happening and, on the other, they allow us to formulate a well-founded set of implications for policy and practice related to in-service teacher education in our context.

Informació de finançament

La investigación de la que proceden ha sido financiada por el Ministerio de Educación (EDU2012-38787) y no solo se ocupó de los contenidos, sino también de otras dimensiones de la formación como las políticas educativas y de profesorado, las actividades formativas, los aprendizajes docentes y la incidencia del desarrollo profesional en la enseñanza y el alumnado.

Finançadors

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Abela, A. (2001). Las técnicas de análisis de contenido: una revisión actualizada. Sevilla: Fundación Centro de Estudios Andaluces.
  • Anderson, G. & Cohen, M. (2015). Redesigning the Identities of Teachers and Leaders: A Framework for Studying New Professionalism and Educator Resistance, Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 23(85), 2-25.
  • Biesta, G. (2014). Pragmatising the Curriculum: bringing knowledge back into the curriculum conversation, but via pragmatism. The Curriculum Journal, 25(1), 29-49.
  • Borko, H., Liston, D. & Wihtcomb, J. (2007). Genres of emprical research in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 3-11.
  • Cochram-Smith, M. (2010). Toward a Theory of Teacher Education for Social Justice. En A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second International Hanbook of Educational Change. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Cochram-Smith, M. & Villegas, A. y otros. (2015). Critiquing Teacher Preparation Research: An Overview of the Field. Part II. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(2), 109-121.
  • Darling Hammond, L. & Brandsford, J. (2005). Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  • Cochram-Smith, S. y Lyttle, S. (2002). Dentro/fuera. Enseñantes que investigan. Madrid: Akal.
  • Deng, Z. (2007). Transforming the Subject Matter: Examining the Intellectual Roots of Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 37(3), 279-275.
  • Escudero, J. M. (2012). Claros y oscuros del Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior como innovación educativa. En C. Leite y M. Zabalza, Ensino Superior: Innovaçao e Qualidade na Docencia. CIIE.
  • Escudero, J. M., González, M. T. y Rodríguez, M. J. (2013). La Mejora Equitativa de la Educación y la Formación del Profesorado. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 3 (3), 206-234.
  • Escudero, J. M. y Portela, A. (2015). Un marco teórico para el análisis de la formación continuada del profesorado. En M. A. Flores e I. Ferreira (Eds.), Formaçao e Trabalho Docente. Proyetos, Politicas e Prácticas. ISATT International Conference. Braga: De Facto Eds.
  • Escudero, J. M. y Trillo, F. (2015). El desarrollo profesional del profesorado, ¿crisis del currículo, de las prácticas y de los efectos de la formación docente? En M. Assunçao, M. Moreira, y L. Oliveira (eds.), Desafíos curriculares e Pedagógicos na Formaçao de Professores. Ediçoes Pedagógicas Lda.
  • European Commission. (2012). Supporting the Teaching Professions for Better Learning Outcomes. Commission Staff Working Document. Strasbourg.
  • European Commission. (2013). Supporting Teacher Competences Development for better learning outcomes.
  • Eurydice. (2015). The Teaching Profession in Europe: Practices, Perceptions and Policies. Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • George, D. & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. (4th ed.).
  • González, M. T. (2005). Departamentos de Secundaria y desarrollo profesional. En M. Fernández Enguita y M. Gutiérrez Sastre (coords.), Organización escolar, profesión docente y entorno comunitario (pp. 229-254). Madrid: Akal.
  • González, M. T. y Cutanda, T. (2015). La formación del profesorado y la implicación (engagement) de los alumnos en su aprendizaje. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 69(2), 9-24.
  • Hargreaves, A. & Goodson, I. (1996). Teachers Professional Lives: Aspirations and Actualities. En I. Goodson & I. Hargreaves (eds.) Teacher Professional Lives. London: The Falmer Press.
  • Hargreaves, A. y Fullan, M. (2014). Capital profesional. Madrid: Morata.
  • Harris, J., Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Learning Activity Types: Curriculum-based
  • Technology Integration Reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416.
  • Hattie, J. (2012). Visible Learning for Teachers. Maximazing impact for Learning. London: Routledge.
  • Hollins, E. R. (2011). Teacher Preparation for Quality Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education 62(4) 395–407.
  • Hustler, D., McNamara, O., Jarvis, J., Londra, M. & Campbell, A. (2003). Teachers´ Perception of Continuing Professional Development.
  • Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M. y Beavis, A. (2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers’ knowledge, practice, student outcomes an efficacy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13, 1-26.
  • Kereluik, K., Mishra, P., Fahnoe, Ch. & Terry, L. (2013). What Knowledge Is of Most Worth: Teacher Knowledge for 21st Century Learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(4), 127-140.
  • Knight, S. et al. (2015). Reconceptualizing Teacher Quality to Inform Preservice and In-Service Teacher Development. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(2), 105-108.
  • Lee, O., Adamson, K., Maerten, J., Lewis, S., Thornton, A. & LeRoy, K. (2008). Teachers’ Perspectives on a Professional Development Intervention to Improve Science Instruction Among English Language Learners. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19, 41–67.
  • Marcelo, C. (2007). La formación docente en la sociedad del conocimiento y la información: avances y temas pendientes. Olhar de professor, 10(1), 63-90.
  • MacCaughtry, N. (2005). Elaborating pedagogical content knowledge: what it means to know students and think about teaching. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 11 (4), 379–395.
  • Menter, I., Hulme, M., Elliot, D. & Lewin, J. (2011). Literature Review on Teacher Education in the 21st. Century. The Scottish Government.
  • Pérez Gómez, A. I. (2012). Educarse en la era digital. Madrid: Morata.
  • Priestley, M., & Sinnema, C. E. (2014). Downgraded curriculum? An analysis of knowledge in new curricula in Scotland and New Zealand. Curriculum Journal, 25(1), 50-75. doi:10.1080/09585176.2013.872047.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. [Versión en castellano: Shulman,
  • Shulman, L. S. (2005). Conocimiento y enseñanza: Fundamentos de la nueva reforma. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 9, (21-30).
  • Shulman, L. S. & Shulman, J. (2004). What and how teachers learn: a shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 257-271.
  • Stodolsky, S., & Grossman, P.(1995). The Impact of Subject Matter on Curricular Activity: An Analysis of Five Academic Subjects. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 227-249.
  • TALIS (2009). Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments. Paris: OECD.
  • TALIS (2014). Estudio Internacional de la Enseñanza y el Aprendizaje. Informe Español. Madrid: Ministerio de Educacion.
  • Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H. & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher Professional Learning and Development. Best Evidence Synthesis.
  • Villegas Reimers, E. (2003). Teacher Professional Development: an International review of the literature. International Institute of Educational Planning. UNESCO.
  • Viñao Frago, A. (2015). Monográfico Profesorado: Homenaje a Julio Ruiz Berrio. Historia y Memoria de la Educación, 1, 9-417.
  • Wei, R., Darling Hammond, L. y Adamson, F. (2010). Professional Development in EEUU: Trends and Challenges. Phase II Study Technical Report. The Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
  • Young, M. (2013). Overcoming the crisis in curriculum theory: a knowledgebased approach. Curriculum Studies, 45(2), 101-118.
  • Zeichner, K. (2010). La formación del profesorado y la lucha por la justicia social. Madrid: Morata.
  • Zeichner, K., Payne, K. & Brayko, K. (2015). Democratizing Teacher Education, Journal of Teacher Education, 66(2), 122-135.