Validación de la Escala de Creencias Implícitas de habilidad (CNAAQ-2) al contexto españoldiferencias según la práctica físico-deportiva.

  1. Moreno Murcia, Juan Antonio
  2. Cervelló Gimeno, Eduardo
  3. Martínez Galindo, María Celestina
  4. Moreno González, Remedios
Journal:
RICYDE. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte

ISSN: 1885-3137

Year of publication: 2013

Volume: 9

Issue: 32

Pages: 100-113

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5232/RICYDE2013.03201 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: RICYDE. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte

Abstract

The objective of this work has been to validate the Spanish version of the Conceptions of the Nature of Athletic Ability Questionnaire-2 (Biddle, Wang, Chatzisarantis, and Spray, 2003). A sample of 1008 physical education students aged 15 to 17 years. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were calculated. In addition, analysis of reliability and simple correlations were employed. External evidences of validity were assessed using the physical - sport practice. The results indicated that the scale was valid and reliable for its utilization with Spanish teenagers involved in physical education classes, and that the entity and incremental beliefs of ability present differences depending on the physical - sports practice, finding positive relationships between the incremental beliefs and the physical - sports practice.

Bibliographic References

  • Azorín, F., y Sánchez-Crespo, J. L. (1986). Métodos y aplicaciones del método. Madrid: Alianza.
  • Biddle, S.; Soos, I., & Chatzisarantis, N. (1999). Predicting physical activity intentions using a goal perspectives approach: A study of Hungarian youth. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 9, 353-357.
  • Biddle, S. J. H.; Wang, C. K. J.; Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., & Spray, C. M. (2003). Motivation for physical activity in young people: Entity and incremental beliefs about athletic ability. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21, 973-989.
  • Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. B. (2003). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. En Kazdin E. A. (Ed.), Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research, 3 rd ed. (pp. 207-232). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
  • Dweck, C. S. (2002). The development of ability conceptions. En A. Wigfield y J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 57-88). New York: Academic Press.
  • Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169-189.
  • Elliot, A. J. (2005). El cambio educativo desde la investigación acción. Madrid: Morata.
  • Fonseca, A. M., y Brito, P. A. (2000). Las concepciones sobre la competencia deportiva y los objetivos de logro. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 9, 159-176.
  • González-Cutre, D.; Martínez Galindo, C.; Alonso, N.; Cervelló, E.; Conte, L., y Moreno, J. A. (2007). Las creencias implícitas de habilidad y los mediadores psicológicos como variables predictoras de la motivación autodeterminada en deportistas adolescentes. En J. Castaño y O. Usabiaga (Eds.), Investigación en la Actividad Física y el Deporte II (pp. 407-417). Vitoria: Universidad del País Vasco.
  • Hair, J. F.; Anderson, R. E.; Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey, Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River.
  • Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Adaptación de tests para su uso en diferentes idiomas y culturas: fuentes de error, posibles soluciones y directrices prácticas. En J. Muñiz (Ed.), Psicometría (pp. 207-238). Madrid: Universitas.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
  • King, L. A., & Williams, T. A. (1997). Goal orientation and performance in martial arts. Journal of Sport Behavior, 20, 397-411.
  • Li, W.; Lee, A. M., & Solmon, M. A. (2005). Relationships among dispositional ability conceptions, intrinsic motivation, perceived competence, experience, persistence, and performance. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 24, 51-65.
  • Lintunen, T.; Valkonen, A.; Leskinen, E., & Biddle, S. (1999). Predicting physical activity intentions using a goal perspectives approach: A study of Finnish youth. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine y Science in Sports, 9, 344-352.
  • Lynn, M. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35, 382-385.
  • McDonald, R. P., & Marsh, H. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: noncentrality and goodness of fit. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 247-255.
  • Moreno, J. A.; González-Cutre, D.; Sicilia, A., & Spray, C. M. (2010). Motivation in the exercise setting: Integrating constructs from the approach-avoidance achievement goal framework and self-determination theory. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11(6), 542-550.
  • Mulaik, S. A.; James, L. R.; Van Astine, J.; Bennett, N.; Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 430-445.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Ommundsen, Y. (2001a). Pupils' affective responses in physical education classes: the association of implicit theories of the nature of ability and achievement goals. European Physical Education Review, 7, 219-242.
  • Ommundsen, Y. (2001b). Self-handicapping strategies in physical education classes: the influence of implicit theories of the nature of ability and achievement goal orientations. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2, 139-156.
  • Ommundsen, Y. (2003). Implicit theories of ability and self-regulation strategies in physical education classes. Educational Psychology, 23, 141-157.
  • Ommundes, Y.; Haugen, R., & Lund, T. (2005). Academic self-concept, implicit theories of ability, and self-regulation strategies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 461-474.
  • Sarrazin, P.; Biddle, S. J. H.; Famose, J. P.; Cury, F.; Fox, K., & Durand, M. (1996). Goal orientations and conceptions of the nature of sport ability in children: a social cognitive approach. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 399-414.
  • Spray, C. M.; Wang, C. K. J.; Biddle, S. J. H.; Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., & Warburton, V. E. (2006). An experimental test of self-theories of ability in youth sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7, 255-267.
  • Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10.
  • Wang, C. K. J., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2001). Young people's motivational profiles in physical activity: A cluster analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 23, 1-22.
  • Wang, C. K. J., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2003). Intrinsic motivation towards sports in Singaporean students: The role of sport ability beliefs. Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 515-523.
  • Wang, C. K. J.; Chatzisarantis, N. L. D.; Spray, C. M., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2002). Achievement goal profiles in school physical education: Differences in self-determination, sport ability beliefs, and physical activity. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 433-445.
  • Wang, C. K. J.; Liu, W. C.; Biddle, S. J. H., & Spray, C. M. (2005). Cross-cultural validation of the Conceptions of the Nature of Athletic Ability Questionnaire Version 2. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1245-1256.
  • Xiang, P.; Lee, A., & Shen, J. (2001). Conceptions of ability and achievement goals in physical education: Comparisons of American and Chinese students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 348-365.
Data source: Dialnet