Sociología e Historiaun diálogo en el cambio de siglo

  1. Latorre Catalán, Marta 1
  2. Romero Ramos, Héctor 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

Revista:
Política y sociedad

ISSN: 1130-8001,  1988-3129

Any de publicació: 2018

Títol de l'exemplar: Historia y ciencias sociales: nuevas perspectivas de análisis

Volum: 55

Número: 1

Pàgines: 19-42

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.5209/POSO.57838 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: Política y sociedad

Resum

In this article we will review the relationship between sociology and history to the consolidation of the subfield of historical sociology during the sixties of last century. We will see what themes and theoretical and methodological problems have faced since then and in what context they made sense. Finally, we reflect on the validity of the classical agenda of historical sociology (the historical formation of national states, the processes of modernization and capitalist development or social revolutions) in the current social and political context, to conclude on how, paradoxically, before an idea of questioned modernity, the look of historical sociology can be turned to models of classical sociology.

€ Mostra el finançament

Informació de finançament

Héctor Romero participa en el proyecto de investigación “Crisis y cambios sociales: impactos en el proceso de modernización en la España del siglo XIX, 1898-2008” (HAR2014-54793-R), financiado por el Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad.

Finançadors

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Abbot, A. (2016): Processual Sociology, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  • Abbot, A. (2001): Chaos of Disciplines, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  • Adams, J. (2011): “1-800-How-Am-I-Driving?”, Social Science History, 35(1), pp. 1-17.
  • Adams, J., E. Clemens y A. S. Orloff, eds., (2005): Remaking Modernity: Politics, History, and Sociology, Durham, Duke University Press.
  • Álvarez Junco, J. (2016): Dioses útiles, Madrid, Galaxia Gutenberg.
  • Biernacki, R. (2005): “The Action Turn? Comparative-Historical Inquiry beyond the Classical Model of Conduct”, en J. Adams, E. Clemens y A. S. Orloff, Remaking Modernity: Politics, History, and Sociology, Durham, Duke University Press, pp. 75-91.
  • Bourdieu, P. (2014): Sobre el Estado. Cursos en el Collège de France (1989-1992), Barcelona, Anagrama.
  • Bourdieu, P. y R. Chartier (2011): El sociólogo y el historiador, Madrid, Adaba.
  • Bozarslan, H. (2012): “Reflexiones acerca de las configuraciones revolucionarias en Túnez y Egipto”, Sociología Histórica 1, pp. 55-67.
  • Braudel, F. (1968): La Historia y las Ciencias sociales, Madrid, Alianza.
  • Burawoy, M. (1989): “Two Methods in Search of Science: Sckocpol versus Trotsky”, Theory and Society 18(6), pp.759-805.
  • Burke, P. (2015): The French Historical Revolution: the Annales School, 1929-2014. Stanford, Stanford University Press.
  • Burke, P. (1987): Sociología e Historia, Madrid, Alianza.
  • Charrad, M. M. y J. Adams (2011): “Patrimonialism, past and present”, AAPSS, 636, pp. 6-15.
  • Clemens, E. (2010): “Democratization and Discourse: The Public Sphere and Comparative Historical Research”, Social Science History 34(3), pp. 373-381 (Special Section: History and the Social Sciences: Taking Stock and Moving Ahead).
  • Clemens, E. (2005): “Afterword: Logics of History? Agency, Multiplicity, and Incoherence in the Explanation of Change”, en J. Adams, E. Clemens y A. S. Orloff, eds., Remaking Modernity: Politics, History, and Sociology, Durham, Duke University Press.
  • Collins, R. (2004): Macrohistory. Essays in Sociology of the Long Run, Stanford University Press.
  • Cruz, R. (2015): Protestar en España, 1900-2013, Madrid, Alianza Editorial.
  • Cruz, R. (2008): Repertorios. La política de enfrentamiento en el siglo XX, Madrid, CIS.
  • Cruz, R. y M. Pérez Ledesma, eds., (1997): Cultura y movilización en la España contemporánea, Madrid, Alianza Editorial.
  • Diehl, D. y D. McFarland (2010): “Toward a Historical Sociology Social Situations”, American Journal of Sociology 115(6), pp. 1713-1752.
  • Elias, N. (1982): La sociedad cortesana, Madrid, FCE.
  • Funes, Mª J., ed., (2011): A propósito de Tilly: conflicto, poder y acción colectiva, Madrid, CIS.
  • García, M.-C. (2012): “Entrevista con Hamit Bozarslan”, Sociología Histórica, 1, pp. 89-107.
  • Goldstone, J. A. (2003): “Comparative Historical Analysis and Knowledge Accumulation in the Study of Revolutions”, en Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, New York, Cambridge University Press, pp. 41-90.
  • Haydu, J. (2010): “Reversals of fortune: path dependency, problem solving, and temporal cases”, Theory and Society 39(1), pp. 25-48.
  • Hobsbawm, E. (1998): Sobre la Historia, Barcelona, Crítica.
  • Hunt, L. (1986): “French History in the Last Twenty Years: The Rise and Fall of the Annales School”, Journal of Contemporary History 21, pp. 209-224.
  • Hunt, L. y J. Revel (2012): “History: Past, Present, and Future. A Conversation between Lynn Hunt and Jacques Revel”, Perspectives in History, American Historical Association (diciembre 2012).
  • Juliá, S. (2010/1989): Historia social/sociología histórica, Madrid, Siglo XXI.
  • Kalberg, S. (2012): Max Weber’s Comparative-Historical Sociology Today, Surrey, UK, Ashgate.
  • Koller, A. (2010): “The Public Sphere and Comparative Historical Research: An Introduction”, Social Science History 34(3), pp. 261-290 (Special Section: History and the Social Sciences: Taking Stock and Moving Ahead).
  • Krech, S. (1991): “The State of Ethnohistory”, Annual Review of Anthropology, 20, pp. 345-375.
  • Latorre, M. y H. Romero (2011): “Revolución y contrarrevolución: The Vendée y las raíces intelectuales de la sociología histórica de Charles Tilly”, en Mª J. Funes, ed., A propósito de Tilly: conflicto, poder y acción colectiva, Madrid, CIS.
  • Mahoney, J. (2000): “Path dependence in historical sociology”, Theory and Society 29, pp. 507-548.
  • Mahoney, J. y D. Rueschemeyer, eds., (2003): Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, New York, Cambridge University Press.
  • Mahoney, J. y D. Rueschemeyer, eds., (2003): “Comparative Historical Analysis. Achievements and Agendas”, en Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, New York, Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-38.
  • McDaniel, T. (2007): “The Strange Career of Radical Islam”, en J. N. Wasserstrom, G. Grandin, L. Hunt y M. B. Young, Human Rights and Revolutions, Lanham, Maryland, Rowman&Littlefield, pp. 169-188.
  • McDaniel, T. (1991): Autocracy, Modernization and Revolution in Russia and Iran, NJ, Princeton University Press.
  • McDaniel, T. (1988): Autocracy, Capitalism and Revolution in Russia, Berkeley, University of California Press.
  • Mann, M. (1997): “Has Globalization Ended the Rise and Rise of the Nation-State?”, Review of International Political Economy 4(3), pp. 472-496.
  • Paramio, L. (1986): “Defensa e ilustración de la sociología histórica”, Zona Abierta, 38, pp. 1-18.
  • Pérez-Garzón, J. (2014): “Sobre la Historia política y la vuelta del Estado”, en P. Díaz, P. Martínez Lillo y A. Soto, El poder de la Historia: huella y legado de Javier Mª Donézar Díez de Ulzurrun, Madrid, UAM, pp. 35-50.
  • Poggi, G. (2006): Weber, Madrid, Alianza.
  • Ramos, R. (1994): “Del aprendiz de brujo a la escalada reflexiva: el problema de la historia en la sociología de Norbert Elias”, REIS (65), pp. 27-53.
  • Ramos, R. (1993): “Problemas textuales y metodológicos de la sociología histórica”, REIS (63), pp. 7-28.
  • Rhomberg, Ch. (2013): “Clase y acción colectiva: escribir historias sobre actores y eventos”, Sociología Histórica, 3, pp. 117-144.
  • Romero, H. y G. Brändle (2017) “Annales School”, en B. S Turner, ed., Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory, Londres, Wiley (en imprenta).
  • Steinmetz, G. (2017): “Field Theory and Interdisciplinarity: History and Sociology in Germany and France during the Twentieth Century”, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 59(2), pp. 477-514.
  • Steinmetz, G. (2014): “Comparative History and Its Critics. A Genealogy and a Possible Solution”, en P. Duara, V. Murthy y A. Sartori, A Companion to Global Historical Thought. Malden, MA, Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Steinmetz, G. (2011): “Bourdieu, Historicity, and Historical Sociology”, Cultural Sociology 5(1), pp. 45-66.
  • Steinmetz, G. (2007): “The Relations between Sociology and History in the United States: The Current State of Affairs”, Journal of Historical Sociology 20(1/2).
  • Steinmetz, G. (2005): “The Epistemological Unconscious of U.S. Sociology and the Transition to Post-Fordism: The Case of Historical Sociology”, en J. Adams, E. Clemens y A. S. Orloff., eds., Remaking Modernity: Politics, History, and Sociology, Durham, Duke University Press, pp. 109-157.
  • Skocpol, Th. (2003): “Doubly engaged social science: the promise of comparative historical analysis”, en J. Mahoney y D. Ruesmayer, Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, New York, Cambridge University Press, pp. 407-428.
  • Skocpol, Th. (1984a): “Sociology’s Historical Imagination”, en Vision and Method in Historical Sociology, NY, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-20.
  • Skocpol, Th. (1984b): “Emerging Agendas and Recurrent Strategies in Historical Sociology”, en Vision and Method in Historical Sociology, NY, Cambridge University Press, pp. 356-391.
  • Skocpol, Th., ed., (1984): Vision and Method in Historical Sociology, NY, Cambridge University Press.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet