Diseño y validación de una escala para medir el estilo controlador del estudiante de Educación Superior

  1. Huéscar Hernández, Elisa
  2. Moreno-Murcia, Juan Antonio
  3. Alías García, Antonio
Journal:
Psychology, Society & Education

ISSN: 1989-709X,  2171-2085

Year of publication: 2017

Volume: 9

Issue: 2

Pages: 239-249

Type: Article

DOI: 10.25115/PSYE.V9I2.696 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Psychology, Society & Education

Abstract

The goal was the design and validation of an instrument of interpersonal style evaluation of student driver Higher Education. Involved 332 college students (140 boys and 192 girls) 2nd year 6 degrees belonging to the area of Health Sciences with an average of 21.05 years (SD = 3.97). Afterseveralphases and support factor analysis (exploratory and confirmatory) (SCS) was composed of a single factor of eight items. The results indicate that the scale has construct validity, reliability and predictive validity, as compared to the variable sex, interaction control strategies by the boys appear more frequently than girls. The scale generated is presented as valid and reliable, recommending its use in assessing interaction styles of students.

Bibliographic References

  • Abós, A., Sevil, J., Sanz, M., Aibar, A., y García-González (2016). El soporte de autonomía en Educación Física como medio de prevención de la oposición desafiante del alumnado. RICYDE. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte, 43, 65-78.
  • Adie, J. W., Duda, J. L., y Ntoumanis, N. (2012). Perceived coach-autonomy support, basic need satisfaction and the well- and ill-being of elite youth soccer players: A longitudinal investigation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13, 51-59.
  • Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y., y Roth, G. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of por motivation and engagement in girls and boys: the role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15, 397e413.
  • Balaguer, I., Castillo, I., Duda, J. L., y Tomás, I. (2009). Análisis de las propiedades psicométricas de la versión española del Cuestionario de Clima en el Deporte. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 18(1), 73-83.
  • Balaguer, I., Gonzalez, L., Fabra, P., Castillo, I., Mercé, J., y Duda, J. L. (2012). Coaches’ interpersonal style, basic psychological needs and the well- and ill-being of young soccer players: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30, 1-11.
  • Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., y Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2010). Thecontrolling interpersonal style in a coachingcontext: Development and initialvalidation of a psychometric scale. Journal of Sport & ExercisePsychology, 31, 193-216.
  • Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., Bosch, J. A., y Thogersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011). Self-determination theory and diminished functioning: The role of interpersonal control and psychological needthwarting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, (11), 1459-1473.
  • Bartholomew, K., Ntoumanis, N., y Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011). Self-determination theory and the darker side of Athletic experience: the role of interpersonal control and needthwarting. Sport and Exercise Psychology Review, 7, 23-27.
  • Black, A. E., y Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organi cchemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740-756.
  • Boggiano, A. K., Flink, C., Shields, A., Seelbach, A., y Barrett, M. (1993). Use of techniques promoting students’ self- determination: Effects on students’ analytic problem-solving skills. Motivation and Emotion, 17, 319-336. doi: 10.1007/BF00992323
  • Brown, C. G. (2012). A systematic review of the relationship between self-efficacy and burnout in teachers. Educational & Child Psychology, 29(4), 47-63.
  • Cano, F. (2000). Diferencias de género en estrategias y estilos de aprendizaje. Psicothema, 12(3), 360-367.
  • Castillo, I., González, L., Fabra, P., Mercé, J., y Balaguer, I. (2012). Estilo interpersonal controlador del entrenador, frustración de las necesidades psicológicas básicas, y burnout en futbolistas infantiles. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 12(1), 143-146.
  • Castillo, I., Tomás, I., Ntoumanis, N., Bartholomew, K. J., Duda, J.L., y Balaguer, I. (2014). The Spanish version of the Controlling Coach Behaviors Scale in the Sport Context: Psychometric properties and invariance over time and competitive level. Psicothema, 26, 409-414.
  • Close, S., y Shiel, G. (2009). Gender and PISA Mathematics: Irish results in context. European Educational Research Journal, 8(1), 20-33.
  • Coatsworth, J. D., y Conroy, D. E. (2009). The effects of autonomy-supportive coaching, need satisfaction, and self-perceptions on initiative and identity in youths wimmers. Developmental Psychology, 45, 320-328.
  • Deci, E. L., y Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Nueva York: Plenum Press.
  • Deci, E. L., y Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024-1037.
  • Deci, E. L., Schwartz, A., Sheinman, L., y Ryan, R. M. (1981). An instrument to assess adults’ orientation stoward control versus autonomy in children: Reflections on intrinsic motivation and perceived competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 642-650.
  • Forstadt, L. (2007). Swimming with thes harks: Basis of job satisfaction for teachers who educate at-risk, high-school students. Unpublished dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
  • García, J. L. (2006). Los Estilos de Aprendizaje y las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación en la Formación del Profesorado. Tesis Doctoral. Dirigida por Catalina Alonso García. Madrid: Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.
  • Gené, P. S., y Latinjak, A. T. (2014). Relación entre las necesidades básicas y la autodeterminación en deportistas de élite. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 14(3), 49-56.
  • Gledhill, R. F., y van Der Merwe, C. A. (1989). Gender as a factor in student learning: preliminary findings. Medical Education, 23, 201-204.
  • Grimes, S.K. (1995). Targeting academic programs to student diversity utilizing learning styles and learning-studys trategies. Journal of College Student Development, 36(5), 422-430.
  • Grolnick, W. S., y Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children’s learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 890-898.
  • Hagger, M. S. (2014). Avoiding the “dejà-variable” phenomenon: social psychology needs more guides to constructs. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 52.
  • Hagger, M. S., y Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2007). Advances in self-determination theory research in sport and exercise. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 597-599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.06.003.
  • Hein, V., Koka, A., y Hagger, M. (2015). Relationships between perceived teachers’ controlling behaviour, psychological needth warting, anger and bullying behaviour in high-school students. Journal of Adolescence, 42, 103-114.
  • Huangfu, W. (2012). Effects of EFL Teachers’ Self-Efficacyon Motivational Teaching Behaviors. Asian Social Science, 8(15), 68-74.
  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning. Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Englewoodcliffs. New York: Prentice-Hall.
  • Ley Orgánica 1/1990, de 3 de octubre, de Ordenación General del Sistema Educativo (LOGSE), BOE, núm. 238, de 4 de octubre de 1990, (28927-28942).
  • Ley Orgánica 2/2006, de 3 de mayo, de Educación (LOE). BOE, núm. 106, de 4 de mayo de 2006, (17158-17207).
  • Ley Orgánica 8/2013, de 9 de diciembre, para la mejora de la calidad educativa (LOMCE). BOE, núm. 295, de 10 de diciembre de 2013, (97858-97921).
  • López-Aguado, M. (2004). Estilo de aprendizaje pragmático en estudiantes universitarios. Variables relacionadas y valoración diferencial del buen profesor en función del grado de preferencia. Actas del I Congreso Internacional de Estilos de Aprendizaje. Madrid: UNED.
  • Martínez, P. (2004). Investigación y análisis de los estilos de aprendizaje del profesorado y de sus alumnos del primer ciclo de Educación Secundaria Obligatoria (ESO) en el ámbito del CPR de Laredo. Cantabria. España. Actas del I Congreso Internacional de Estilos de Aprendizaje. Madrid: UNED.
  • Ntoumanis, N. (2001). A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 225-242.
  • Niemiec, C. P., Ryan, R. M., y Deci, E. L. (2009). The pathtaken: consequences of attaining intrinsic and extrinsic aspirations in post-college life. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 291-306.
  • López-Aguado, M. (2004). Estilo de aprendizaje pragmático en estudiantes universitarios. Variables relacionadas y valoración diferencial del buen profesor en función del grado de preferencia. Actas del I Congreso Internacional de Estilos de Aprendizaje. Madrid: UNED.
  • López-Aguado, M. (2011). Estilos de aprendizaje. Diferencias por género, curso y titulación. Revista Estilos de Aprendizaje, 7(7), 109-134.
  • Pegalajar, M. C., y López, L. (2015). Competencias emocionales en el proceso de formación del docente de Educación Infantil. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 13(3), 95-106.
  • Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., y Briere, N. M. (2001). Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 279-306.
  • Pelletier, L. G., Seguin-Levesque, C., y Legault, L. (2002). Pressure from above and pressure from below as determinants of teachers’ moti- vation and teaching behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 186-196.
  • Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy suppor- tive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159-175. doi:10.1080/00461520 903028990
  • Severiens, S.E., y Ten Dam, G.T.(1994). Gender differences in learning styles: a narrative review and quantitative meta-analysis. Higher Education, 27, 487-501.
  • Soenens, B., Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Dochy, F., y Goossens, L. (2012). Psychologically controlling teaching: Examining outcomes, antecedents, and mediators. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 108-120.
  • Tessier, D., Sarrazin, P., y Ntoumanis, N. (2008). The effects of an experimental program metosupport students’ autonomy on the overt behaviours of physical education teachers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23, 239-253.
  • Trigueros, R., Aguilar, J. M., Fernández, J. M., Manzano, A., y Alcaráz, M. (2016). Validación de la CCBS en actividad física en personas mayores de 55 años de edad. Actas del IV Congreso Internacional de Deporte Inclusivo. Universidad de Almería.
  • Utman, C. H. (1997). Performance effects of motivational state: A metaanalysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 170-182.
  • Vallerand, R. J. y Losier, G. F. (1999). An integrative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11, 142-169.
  • Wilson, K. L., Smart, R. M., y Watson, R. J. (1996). Gender differences in approaches to learning in first year psychology students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 59-71.
Data source: Dialnet