Impacto del concepto PLE en la literatura sobre educaciónla última década

  1. Linda Castañeda 1
  2. Gemma Tur 2
  3. Ricardo Torres-Kompen 3
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia (España)
  2. 2 Universitat de les Illes Balears (España)
  3. 3 Universitat Ramón Llull – La Salle (España)
Erakutsi afiliazioak +
Aldizkaria:
RIED: revista iberoamericana de educación a distancia

ISSN: 1138-2783

Argitalpen urtea: 2019

Zenbakien izenburua: Debates sobre Tecnología y Educación: Caminos contemporáneos y conversaciones pendientes

Alea: 22

Zenbakia: 1

Orrialdeak: 221-241

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.5944/RIED.22.1.22079 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: RIED: revista iberoamericana de educación a distancia

Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak

Laburpena

El concepto de Entorno Personal de Aprendizaje (PLE) es uno de los conceptos que ha recibido una mayor atención en los últimos años en el ámbito de la tecnología educativa. Los que estudiamos el tema asumimos —hay quien dice que de forma ingenua o acrítica— que se trata de un concepto realmente disruptivo, fundamental y que está en la base de los enfoques pedagógicos emergentes propios del momento tecno-social que nos enmarca, no solo en la faceta tecnológica-instrumental, sino también en los fundamentos mismos del proceso educativo. No obstante, poco sabemos sobre el impacto de este concepto y sus allegados en otros temas educativos no necesariamente ligados a la tecnología. A continuación, a través de una revisión de literatura sistematizada, se analiza el impacto del tema PLE en los tres principales focos temáticos de la literatura científica sobre educación de la última década: prácticas pedagógicas emergentes, aprendizaje autorregulado y desarrollo profesional docente. Se analiza si los PLE han impactado en cada uno de los temas; el nivel de importancia de ese impacto adquiere en cada uno de ellos y la forma en que se “materializa” en las diferentes temáticas. Las conclusiones de este artículo pretenden ofrecer sugerencias sobre cuál puede ser el futuro de la investigación y la práctica de un concepto que, tras algo más de diez años de su aparición en el ámbito educativo, sigue considerándose emergente.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Abrami, P. C., Venkatesh, V., Meyer, E. J., y Wade, C. A. (2013). Using electronic portfolios to foster literacy and self-regulated learning skills in elementary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1188-1209. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032448
  • Adell, J., y Castañeda, L. (2010). Los Entornos Personales de Aprendizaje (PLEs): una nueva manera de entender el aprendizaje. En R. Roig-Vila y M. Fiorucci (Eds.), Claves para la investigación en innovación y calidad educativa. La integración de las Tecnologías de la Información y la comunicación y la Interculturalidad en las aulas. Alcoi - Roma: Marfil y Roma Tre.
  • Attwell, G. (2007). Personal Learning Environments - the future of eLearning? ELearning Papers, 2, 8.
  • Attwell, G., Cook, J., y Ravenscroft, A. (2009). Appropriating Technologies for Contextual Knowledge: Mobile Personal Learning Environments. En Best Practices for the Knowledge Society. Knowledge, Learning, Development and Technology for All (pp. 15-25). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04757-2_2
  • Barrett, H. C., y Garrett, N. (2009). Online personal learning environments: Structuring electronic portfolios for lifelong and life-wide learning. On the Horizon, 17(2), 142-152. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120910965511
  • Bartolomé, A., Castañeda, L., y Adell, J. (2018). Personalisation in educational technology: the absence of underlying pedagogies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0095-0
  • Booth, A., Papaioannou, D., y Sutton, A. (2012). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review (Edición: 1). Los Angeles; Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Casquero, O. (2013). Una perspectiva tecnológica. En L. Castañeda y J. Adell (Eds.), Entornos personales de aprendizaje: Claves para el ecosistema educativo en red. (pp. 71-84). Alicante: Marfil.
  • Casquero, O., Portillo, J., Ovelar, R., Romo, J., y Benito, M. (2008). iGoogle and gadgets as a platform for integrating institutional and external services. En Proceedigns of the Workshop on Mash- Up Personal Learning Environments (MUPPLE’08) (pp. 37-41). Maastrich, The Netherlands.
  • Castañeda, L., y Adell, J. (Eds.). (2013). Entornos personales de aprendizaje: Claves para el ecosistema educativo en red. Alicante: Marfil.
  • Castañeda, L., Dabbagh, N., y Torres-Kompen, R. (2017). Personal Learning Environments: Research-Based Practices, Frameworks and Challenges. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2017.1.229
  • Chang, C.-C., Tseng, K.-H., Liang, C., y Liao, Y.-M. (2013). Constructing and evaluating online goal-setting mechanisms in web-based portfolio assessment system for facilitating self-regulated learning. Computers and Education, 69, 237-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.016
  • Chatti, M. A., Agustiawan, M. R., Jarke, M., y Specht, M. (2010). Toward a personal learning environment framework. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 1(4), 66-85. https://doi.org/10.4018/jvple.2010100105
  • Chatti, M. A., Jarke, M., y Specht, M. (2010). The 3P Learning Model. Educational Technology y Society, 13(4), 74-85.
  • Cho, K., y Cho, M.-H. (2013). Training of self-regulated learning skills on a social network system. Social Psychology of Education, 16(4), 617-634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9229-3
  • Coll, C., y Engel, A. (2014). Introduction: Personal Learning Environments in the context of formal education / Introducción: los Entornos Personales de Aprendizaje en contextos de educación formal. Cultura y Educación, 26(4), 617-630. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2014.985947
  • Dabbagh, N., y Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
  • De Smet, C., Bourgonjon, J., De Wever, B., Schellens, T., y Valcke, M. (2012). Researching instructional use and the technology acceptation of learning management systems by secondary school teachers. Computers y Education, 58(2), 688-696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.013
  • Downes, S. (2005, octubre). E-learning 2.0. eLearn Magazine, an ACM Publication. Recuperado a partir de https://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=1104968
  • Downes, S. (2007, junio). Open Educational Resources and The Personal Learning Environment. Tecnología presentado en International Conference on OpenCourseWare, Taipei. Recuperado a partir de https://es.slideshare.net/Downes/open-educational-resources-and-the-personal-learning-environment
  • Drexler, W. (2010). The networked student model for construction of personal learning environments: Balancing teacher control and student autonomy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1081
  • Ebner, M., y Taraghi, B. (2010). Personal Learning Environment for Higher Education – A First Prototype. En Proceedings of th World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (pp. 1158-1166). Toronto.
  • Fini, A. (2009). The technological dimension of a massive open online course: The case of the CCK08 course tools. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(5 SPL.ISS.). Recuperado a partir de https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-79956312929ypartnerID=40ymd5=627aa9d999160dc4acdefd3b7103b164
  • González-Martínez, J. A., Bote-Lorenzo, M. L., Gómez-Sánchez, E., y Cano-Parra, R. (2015). Cloud computing and education: A state-of-the-art survey. Computers and Education, 80, 132-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.017
  • Grant, M. J., y Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
  • Hernández, M. A. (2016). Gestión del conocimiento, actividad científica y entornos personales de apredizaje (PLEs): una bibliometría de la PLE conference. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 0(55), 329.
  • Hrastinski, S., y Aghaee, N. M. (2012). How are campus students using social media to support their studies? An explorative interview study. Education and Information Technologies, 17(4), 451-464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-011-9169-5
  • Johnson, M., y Liber, O. (2008). The Personal Learning Environment and the human condition: from theory to teaching practice. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820701772652
  • Jovanović, J., Gašević, D., Torniai, C., Bateman, S., y Hatala, M. (2009). The social semantic web in intelligent learning environments: State of the art and future challenges. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(4), 273-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820903195140
  • Kellogg, S., Booth, S., y Oliver, K. (2014). A social network perspective on peer supported learning in MOOCs for educators. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(5), 263-289.
  • Kitsantas, A. (2013). Fostering college students’ selfregulated learning with learning technologies. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 10(3), 235-252.
  • Kop, R., Fournier, H., y Mak, J. S. F. (2011). A Pedagogy of Abundance or a Pedagogy to Support Human Beings? Participant Support on Massive Open Online Courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(7), 74-93. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i7.1041
  • Lai, C., Wang, Q., y Lei, J. (2012). What factors predict undergraduate students’ use of technology for learning? A case from Hong Kong. Computers and Education, 59(2), 569-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.006
  • Lai, C.-L., y Hwang, G.-J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers and Education, 100, 126-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006
  • Lin, J.-W., Huang, H.-H., y Chuang, Y.-S. (2015). The impacts of network centrality and self-regulation on an e-learning environment with the support of social network awareness. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12120
  • McLoughlin, C., y Lee, M. J. W. (2010). Personalised and self-regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28-43.
  • McMillan, J. H., y Schumacher, S. (2009). Research in Education: Evidence-Based Inquiry (7 edition). Boston: Pearson.
  • Meyer, E., Abrami, P. C., Wade, C. A., Aslan, O., y Deault, L. (2010). Improving literacy and metacognition with electronic portfolios: Teaching and learning with ePEARL. Computers and Education, 55(1), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.005
  • Oakley, G., Pegrum, M., y Johnston, S. (2014). Introducing e-portfolios to pre-service teachers as tools for reflection and growth: lessons learnt. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(1), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2013.854860
  • Okoli, C., y Schabram, K. (2010). A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1954824
  • Prendes, M. P., y Roman, M. (2017). Entornos personales de aprendizaje: Una visión actual de cómo aprender con tecnologías (1.a ed.). Editorial Octaedro, S.L.
  • Rahimi, E., Van Den Berg, J., y Veen, W. (2015). Facilitating student-driven constructing of learning environments using Web 2.0 personal learning environments. Computers and Education, 81, 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.012
  • Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Martínez-Monés, A., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., y Dimitriadis, Y. (2015). Scripting and monitoring meet each other: Aligning learning analytics and learning design to support teachers in orchestrating CSCL situations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 330-343. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12198
  • Shen, P.-D., Lee, T.-H., y Tsai, C.-W. (2011). Applying blended learning with web-mediated self regulated learning to enhance vocational students’ computing skills and attention to learn. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(2), 193-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820902808958
  • Taraghi, B. (2012). Ubiquitous Personal Learning Environment (UPLE). International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 7(S2), 7-14.
  • Taraghi, B., Ebner, M., y Schaffert, S. (2009). Personal Learning Environments for Higher Education: A Mashup Based Widget Concept. En Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Mashup Personal Learning Environments (MUPPLE09) (p. 8). Nice, France.
  • Taraghi, B., Ebner, M., Till, G., y Mühlburger, H. (2009). Personal Learning Environment - a Conceptual Study. Presentado en International Conference on Interactive Computer Aided Learning (ICL 2009), Villach, Australia.
  • Tsai, C.-W. (2010). The effects of feedback in the implementation of web-mediated self-regulated learning. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(2), 153-158. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0267
  • Valjataga, T., y Laanpere, M. (2010). Learner control and personal learning environment: a challenge for instructional design. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(3), 277-291. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2010.500546
  • Veletsianos, G. (2016). Emergence and innovation in digital learning: Foundations and applications. Athabasca University Press.
  • Williams, P. (2008). Leading schools in the digital age: a clash of cultures. School Leadership y Management, 28(3), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430802145779
  • Wong, L.H. (2012). A learner-centric view of mobile seamless learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), E19-E23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01245.x
Datuen iturria: Dialnet