ePortafolio de proceso Vs. de producto como modalidades de implementación didácticala percepción del alumnado

  1. Gemma Tur 1
  2. Linda Castañeda 2
  1. 1 Universitat de les Illes Balears
    info

    Universitat de les Illes Balears

    Palma, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03e10x626

  2. 2 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

Revista:
IJERI: International journal of Educational Research and Innovation

ISSN: 2386-4303

Año de publicación: 2016

Número: 6

Páginas: 187-200

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: IJERI: International journal of Educational Research and Innovation

Resumen

In this current document, we analyse the varying opinions of student teachers on the creation of an eportfolio implemented in one of the two most commons approaches: eportfolio as product or process. For this study, two groups of students have been compared, from Early Childhood Education and Primary Education of the University of the Balearic Islands (n=81) and Murcia (n=63). The research is based on a profound revision of the literature about both designs of eportfolio focusing on essential tasks such as documentation of learning, reflection and collaboration. Findings are absorbing because the differences explored are reduced to a range of nuances in student teachers’ perceptions. On the one hand, results allow us to observe that both approaches can be equally valuable, despite the different strategies carried out. On the contrary, they are interesting because they explore eportfolios in the light of more integrative.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Avello, R., López, R., Gómez, M., Espinosa, G., y Vázquez, S. (2014). Necesidades de formación en TIC de los docentes de las escuelas de Hotelería y Turismo cubanas International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation (IJERI), 2, 15-28. Recuperado de http://www.upo.es/revistas/index.php/IJERI/article/view/1065
  • Barbera, E. (2009). Mutual feedback in e-portfolio assessment: An approach to the netfolio system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 342-357. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00803.x
  • Barberà, E., & de Martín, E. (2009). Portfolio electrónico: Aprender a evaluar el aprendizaje. Barcelona: UOC.
  • Barrett, H. (2010). Balancing the two faces of eportfolios. Educação, Formação i Tecnologias, 3(1), 6-14. Recuperao de http://eft.educom.pt/index.php/eft/article/viewFile/161/102
  • Bernal, C., & Trespaderne, G. (2015). Wikis en la Enseñanza Secundaria. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation (IJERI), 3, 52-63. Recuperado de http://www.upo.es/revistas/index.php/IJERI/article/view/1443
  • Bolliger, D. U., & Shepherd, C. E. (2010). Student perceptions of eportfolio integration in online courses. Distance Education, 31(3), pp. 295-314. DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2010.513955
  • Boza, Á.; Tirado, R. & Guzmán-Franco, M.D. (2010). Creencias del profesorado sobre el significado de la tecnología en la enseñanza: influencia para su inserción en los centros docentes andaluces. RELIEVE, 16(1). Recuperado de http://www.uv.es/RELIEVE/v16n1/RELIEVEv16n1_5.htm
  • Cambridge, D. (2009). Two faces of integrative learning online. En Cambridge, D.; Cambridge, B. y Yancey, K (eds.): Electronic Portfolios 2.0. Emergent Research on Implementation and Impact. Virginia: Stylus.
  • Cambridge, D. (2010). Eportfolios for Lifelong Learning and Assessment. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
  • Castañeda, L. (2011). Analizar y entender la enseñanza flexible. Un modelo de análisis de desarrollo curricular. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, (39), 167-195. Recuperado de http://acdc.sav.us.es/pixelbit/images/stories/p39/13.pdf
  • Cheng, G. & Chau, J. (2013). A study of the effects of goal orientation on the reflective ability of electronic portfolio users. The Internet and Higher Education, 16, pp. 51–56. DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.01.003
  • Coromina, J., Sabate, F., Romeu, J., & Ruiz, F. (2011). Portafolio digital de aprendizaje: Un nuevo medio de comunicación en la educación. Intangible Capital, 7(1), pp.116-142. DOI:10.3926/ic.2011.v7n1.p116-142
  • Dewey, J. (1989). Cómo pensamos: Nueva exposición de la relación entre pensamiento y proceso educativo. Barcelona: Ediciones Paidós.
  • Díaz, F.; Romero, E.; & Heredia, A. (2012). Diseño tecnopedagógico de portafolios electrónicos de aprendizaje: Una experiencia con estudiantes universitarios. Revista Electrónica De Investigación Educativa, 14, (2), p. 103-117. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/155/15525013008.pdf
  • Dorninger, C., & Schrack, C. (2008). Future learning strategy and eportfolios in education. Learning to Live in the Knowledge Society, 227-230. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-09729-9_35
  • Granberg, C. (2010). E-portfolios in teacher education 2002-2009: The social construction of discourse, design and dissemination. European Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 309-322.
  • Hermans, R; Tondeur, J.; van Braak, J. & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers and Education, 51, 1499- 1509.
  • Hernández, G. (2014). Manejo de las tecnologías de la información y de la comunicación de los profesores universitarios: una mirada desde el interior. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation (IJERI), 2, 118-128. Recuperado de http://www.upo.es/revistas/index.php/IJERI/article/view/1146/921
  • Jaurata, B. & Bozu, Z. (2013). Portafolio docente y formación pedagógica inicial del profesorado universitario. Un estudio universitario cualitativo en la Universidad de Barcelona. Educación XXI, 16 (2).
  • JISC InfoNet - Reflection. (2008). JISC infonet - reflection. Recuperado de http://ww.jiscinfonet.ac.uk/infokits/e-portfolios/reflection
  • Jones, V. (2011). EPortfolios and student engagement. En Ascue proceedings. 44th anual conference. June 12-16, 2011 (p. 79).
  • Karsenti, T; Dumouchel, G.; & Collin, S. (2014). The Eportfolio as Support for the Professional Development of Preservice Teachers: a Theoretical and Practical Overview. International Journal of Computers y Technology, 12 (5), p. 3486- 3495.
  • Koetting, J. R. (1984). Foundations of Naturalistic Inquiry: Developing a Theory Base for Understanding Individual Interpretations of Reality. En: Research and Theory Division Symposium: Naturalistic Methodologies for Deriving Individual Meanings from Visuals, 1984, Dallas. Proceedings of the the Annual Meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Oklahoma: University Press, 1984. p.1- 18.
  • Le, Q. (2012). E-Portfolio for enhancing graduate research supervision. Quality Assurance in Education, 20 (1), 54-65.
  • Lin, Q. (2008). Preservice teachers' learning experiences of constructing e-portfolios online. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 194-200.
  • Mellado, M. E. (2010). Portafolio en línea en la formación inicial docente. Revista Electrónica De Investigación Educativa, 12 (1), 1-32.
  • Panke, S. (2014). E-Portfolios in Higher Education Settings: A Literature Review. E-Learn 2014- New Orleans, La, United States, October 27-30. Recuperado de https://www.safetynet-solutions.com.au/uploads/2/6/0/6/26060087/eportfolios.pdf
  • Parker, M., Ndoye, A., & Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2012). Qualitative analysis of student perceptions of e-portfolios in a teacher education program. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(3), 99-107.
  • Pérez Juste, R. (1997). Pedagogía experimental. Madrid: UNED.
  • Rubio, M.J. & Galván, C. (2013). Portafolios digitales para el desarrollo de competencias transversales. Aportaciones principales de los estudios con Carpeta Digital en el marco del Grupo de Investigación Ensenyament i Aprenentatge Virtual. Digital Education Review, 24, 53-68.
  • Snowden, D. & Boone, M. (2007). A Leader ’ s Framework for Decision Making. Harvard business review, noviembre, 1-8.
  • Stephens, B. (2009). Eportfolios in an undergraduate phychology research experiences program . En D. Cambridge, B. Cambridge y K. Yancey (Eds.), Electronic portfolios 2.0. Emergent research on implementation and impact (pp. 103- 108). Virginia: Stylus.
  • Teo, T. (2009) Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers, Computers and Education, 52 (2), 302-312.
  • Tur, G. (2011). Eportfolios and PLEs in Teacher Education. First results. En Proceedings of the The PLE Conference 2011, p. 1-10, Southampton, UK.
  • Tur, G. (2013). Projecte de portafoli electrònic amb eines de la Web 2.0 als estudis de Grau d’Educació Infantil de la UIB a la Seu d’Eivissa. Estudi de cas. Tesis Doctoral Inédita. University of the Balearic Islands. TDX database, 2013. Recuperado de http://www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/111339
  • Wang, C. (2009). Comprehensive assessment of student collaboration in electronic portfolio construction: An evaluation research. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 53(1), 58-66.
  • Yao, Y., Aldrich, J., Foster, K., & Pecina, U. (2009). Preservice teachers perceptions of an electronic portfolio as a tool for reflection and teacher certification. The Journal of Educational Research y Policy Studies, 9(1), 25-44.
  • Zubizarreta, J. (2009). The learning portfolio: Reflective practice for improving student learning (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley y Sons.
  • Adell, J. & Castañeda, L. (2011) Tecnologías emergentes, ¿pedagogías emergentes?, en Hernández, J., Pennesi, M., Sobrino, & Vázquez, A. (coord.). Tendencias emergentes en educación con TIC. Barcelona: Asociación Espiral, Educación y Tecnología, p. 13-32.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet