Hacia una visión contemporánea de la Tecnología Educativa

Bibliographic References

• Achterhuis, H. (Ed.). (2001). American Philosophy of Technology: The Empirical Turn. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Recuperado de http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/374173
• Adell, J. (2010). Educación 2.0. En C. Barba & S. Capella (Eds.), Ordenadores en las aulas. La clave es la metodología. (pp. 19-33). Barcelona: Graó.
• Adell, J. (2018). Más allá del instrumentalismo en tecnología educativa. En J. Gimeno (Ed.), Cambiar los contenidos, cambiar la educación. Madrid: Morata.
• AECT Definition and Terminology Committee. (2004). The Meanings of Educational Technology. AECT Definition and Terminology Committee document #MM4.0. Indiana: University of Indiana. Recuperado de https://www.tlu.ee/~kpata/haridustehnoloogiaTLU/defineeducationaltechnology.pdf
• AECT Task Force on Definition and Terminology (Ed.). (1979). The definition of educational technology. Washington: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
• Anderson, T& Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813
• Archer, M. S., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T & Norrie, A. (Eds.). (1998). Critical realism: Essential readings. London ; New York: Routledge.
• Area, M. (1991a). La tecnología educativa en la actualidad: Las evidencias de una crisis. Qurriculum. Revista de Teoría, Investigación y Práctica Educativa, 3, 1–11. Recuperado de http://www.quadernsdigitals.net/index.php?accionMenu=hemeroteca.VisualizaArticuloIU.visualiza&articulo_id=2650
• Area, M. (1991b). Los medios, los profesores y el currículo. Barcelona: Sendai.
• Area, M. (2004). Los medios y las tecnologías en la educación (Edición: edición). Madrid: Pirámide.
• Area, M., Gros, B& Marzal, M. (2008). Alfabetizaciones y tecnologías de la información y la comunicación (Edición: 1). Sintesis.
• Attwell, G. (2019). Personal Learning Environments. En Literacias críticas e boas práticas mediáticas. Coleção Educação, Centro de Estudos de Comunicação e Sociedade, Universidade do Minho.
• Azevedo, R. (2009). Theoretical, conceptual, methodological, and instructional issues in research on metacognition and self-regulated learning: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 87-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-009-9035-7
• Baker, T., Smith, L& Anissa, N. (2019, Febrero). Educ-AI-tion Rebooted? Exploring the future of artificial intelligence in schools and colleges. NESTA. Recuperado de https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/education-rebooted/
• Ball, S. (1995). Intellectuals or technicians? The urgent role of theory in educational studies. British Journal of Educational Studies, 43(3), 255-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.1995.9974036
• Ball, S. (2013). The education debate. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
• Ball, S. (2016). Following policy: Networks, network ethnography and education policy mobilities. Journal of Education Policy, 31(5), 549-566. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1122232
• Ball, S., Maguire, M., Braun, A., Perryman, J & Hoskins, K. (2011). Assessment technologies in schools: Deliverology and the play of dominations. Research Papers in Education, 27(5), 513-533. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2010.550012
• Bartolomé, A. (1988). Tecnología Educativa. Proyecto docente presentado en el concurso de acceso a la plaza de Profesor Titular de Universidad (Universidad de Barcelona). Barcelona. Recuperado de http://www.lmi.ub.es/personal/bartolome/articuloshtml/bartolome_tit_88/#capitol5
• Bartolomé, A. (2008). Vídeo digital y educación (Edición: 1). Editorial Síntesis, S. A.
• Bartolomé, A., Castañeda, L & Adell, J. (2018a). Personalisation in educational technology: The absence of underlying pedagogies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0095-0
• Bartolomé, A., Castañeda, L & Adell, J. (2018b). Personalisation in educational technology: The absence of underlying pedagogies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0095-0
• Beer, D. (2017). The social power of algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1216147
• Bennett, S& Oliver, M. (2011). Talking back to theory: The missed opportunities in learning technology research. Research in Learning Technology, 19(3), 179-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/21567069.2011.624997
• Biesta, G., Filippakou, O., Wainwright, E & Aldridge, D. (2019). Why educational research should not just solve problems, but should cause them as well. British Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3509
• Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). Why ‘What Works’ Still Won’t Work: From Evidence-Based Education to Value-Based Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29, 491-503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-010-9191-x
• Biesta, G. J. J. (2011). Disciplines and theory in the academic study of education: A comparative analysis of the Anglo-American and Continental construction of the field. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 19, 175-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2011.582255
• Bower, M. (2019). Technology‐mediated learning theory. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1035-1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12771
• Brey, P. (2010). Philosophy of Technology after the Empirical Turn. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 14(1), 36-48.
• Bromley, H. (1997). The Social Chicken and The Technological Egg: Educational Computing and the Technology/Society Divide. Educational Theory, 47(1), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.1997.00051.x
• Buckingham, D. (2006). Defining digital literacy-What do young people need to know about digital media? Digital Kompetanse, 1(Jubileumsnummer), 263-276.
• Buckingham, D., Scanlon, M& Sefton-Green, J. (2001). Selling the Digital Dream. Marketing educational technology to teachers and parents. En A. M. Loveless & V. Ellis (Eds.), ICT, Pedagogy and the Curriculum: Subject to Change. London & New York: Routledge.
• Bulfin, S., Henderson, M., Johnson, N. F & Selwyn, N. (2014). Methodological capacity within the field of “educational technology” research: An initial investigation. Br J Educ Technol, 45, 403-414. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12145
• Byrne, D. (2005). Complexity, Configurations and Cases. Theory, Culture & Society, 22(5), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276405057194
• Cabero, J. (1996). Nuevas tecnologías, comunicación y educación. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 0(1), 001. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.1996.1.576
• Cabero, J. (Ed.). (2007). Tecnología Educativa (Edición: 1). Madrid: McGraw-Hill Interamericana de España S.L.
• Cabero, J& Martínez Sánchez, F. (Eds.). (1995). Nuevos canales de comunicacion en la enseñanza. Madrid: Editorial Universitaria Ramón Areces.
• Caena, F. (2013). Supporting teacher competence development: For better learning outcomes. European Commission. Education and Training. Recuperado de http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/repository/education/policy/school/doc/teachercomp_en.pdf
• Carlson, J& Johnston, L. (2015). Data information literacy: Librarians, data, and the education of a new generation of researchers.
• Castañeda, L. (2016). Suelo y sol: Más pensamiento y contexto para la innovación educativa. Boletín de la Institución Libre de Enseñanza, (104), 37-50.
• Castañeda, L. (2019). Debates sobre Tecnología y Educación: Caminos contemporáneos y conversaciones pendientes. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.22.1.23020
• Castañeda, L., Esteve, F& Adell, J. (2018). ¿Por qué es necesario repensar la competencia docente para el mundo digital? RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 56. https://doi.org/10.6018/red/56/6
• Castañeda, L. & Selwyn, N. (2018). More than tools? Making sense of the ongoing digitizations of higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0109-y
• Clark, A. (2003). Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence. Oxford University Press.
• Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299088
• Clow, D. (2012). The Learning Analytics Cycle: Closing the Loop Effectively. En Proceedings of the 2Nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 134–138). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2330601.2330636
• Cobo, C. (2016). La Innovación Pendiente. Colección Fundación Ceibal/ Debate. Recuperado de http://innovacionpendiente.com/
• Colebatch, H. K. (2015). Participation and Professionalism in Policy Work: Questions for Polities in Transition. Anali Hrvatskog politolotextbackslashvskog drutextbackslashvstva, 11(1), 45-54.
• Coll, C. (2016). La personalización del aprendizaje escolar El qué, el por qué y el cómo de un reto insoslayable. En J. Vilalta (Ed.), Reptes de l’educació a Catalunya. Anuari d’Educació 2015 (pp. 43-104). Barcelona: Fundació Jaume Bofill. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305999815_La_personalizacion_del_aprendizaje_escolar_El_que_el_por_que_y_el_como_de_un_reto_insoslayable
• Costa, C., Hammond, M., & Younie, S. (2019). Theorising technology in education: An introduction. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(4), 395-399. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1660089
• Cuban, L. (1993). Computers meet classroom: Classroom wins. Teachers College Record, 95(2), 185-210.
• Cuban, L. (2009). Oversold and underused. Harvard university press.
• Czerniewicz, L. (2008). Distinguishing the Field of Educational Technology. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 6(3), 171-178.
• Czerniewicz, L. (2010). Educational technology—Mapping the terrain with Bernstein as cartographer. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 523-534.
• Da Silva, T. T. (1999). Documentos de identidade: Uma introdução às teorias do currículo. Autêntica Editora.
• Dabbagh, N. & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
• Davies, P. (1999). What is evidence-based education? British journal of educational studies, 47(2), 108–121.
• De Benito, B. & Salinas, J. M. (2016). La Investigación Basada en Diseño en Tecnología Educativa. Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa. https://doi.org/10.6018/riite2016/260631
• de Laat, M. & Dohn, N. B. (2019). Is Networked Learning Postdigital Education? Postdigital Science and Education, 1(1), 17-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00034-1
• de Laat, P. B. (2017). Algorithmic Decision-Making Based on Machine Learning from Big Data: Can Transparency Restore Accountability? Philosophy & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0293-z
• de Pablos, J. (2009). Tecnología educativa: La formación del profesorado en la era de Internet (Edición: 1). Málaga: Ediciones Aljibe, S.L.
• De Vries, M. (2012). Philosophy of Technology. En P. J. Williams (Ed.), Technology Education for Teachers (pp. 15-34). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
• Decuypere, M. & Simons, M. (2016). Sobre el potencial crítico de los enfoques sociomateriales en educación. Teoría de la Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 28, 25. https://doi.org/10.14201/teoredu20162812544
• Dede, C., Richards, J. & Saxberg, B. (2018). Learning Engineering for Online Education: Theoretical Contexts and Design-based Examples. New York: Routledge.
• Dhar, V. (2013). Data Science and Prediction. Commun. ACM, 56(12), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1145/2500499
• Edsurge. (2017). The State of Edtech 2016. Edsurge. Recuperado de https://www.edsurge.com/research/reports/the-state-of-edtech-2016
• Ely, D. (2008). Frameworks of educational technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(2), 244-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00810.x
• Eraut, M. (1989). Conceptual frameworks and historial development. En M. Eraut (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Educational Technology (1 edition, pp. 11-21). Oxford, England ; New York: Pergamon.
• Esteve, F., Castañeda, L. & Adell, J. (2018). Un modelo holístico de competencia docente para el mundo digital. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 32(1).
• European Union. (2015a, Noviembre 13). DigCompOrg Framework—EU Science Hub—European Commission. Recuperado 6 de Mayo de 2018, de https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/digcomporg/framework
• European Union. (2015b, Diciembre 11). Promoting Effective Digital-Age Learning: A European Framework for Digitally-Competent Educational Organisations - EU Science Hub - European Commission. Recuperado 6 de Mayo de 2018, de https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/promoting-effective-digital-age-learning-european-framework-digitally-competent-educational
• Evans, M. A. (2011). A critical-realist response to the postmodern agenda in instructional design and technology: A way forward. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(6), 799-815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9194-5
• Feenberg, A. (2017). Technosystem: The Social Life of Reason. Harvard University Press.
• Fenwick, T., Edwards, R& Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging Approaches to Educational Research: Tracing the Socio-Material (1 edition). Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York: Routledge.
• Fenwick, T., Edwards, R. & Sawchuk, P. (2015). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the socio-material. Routledge.
• Ferres, J. (2014). Las pantallas y el cerebro emocional. Barcelona: Gedisa. Recuperado de https://www.amazon.es/pantallas-cerebro-emocional-Comunicaci%C3%B3n-Educativa-ebook/dp/B0168HL8HW/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1523665036&sr=1-1&keywords=joan+ferres+pantallas
• Floridi, L. (Ed.). (2016). The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Information (1.a ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757544
• Floridi, L. (2017). The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere Is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Friesen, N. (2009). Re-thinking e-learning research: Foundations, methods, and practices (Vol. 333). Peter Lang.
• Glister, P., Rlister, P. & Gilster, P. (1998). Digital Literacy (Edición: New Ed). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• Goodyear, P& Carvalho, L. (2013). The Analysis of Complex Learning Environments. En H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age. Designing for 21st Century Learning (2.a ed., pp. 49-63). London & New York: Rouledge.
• Granovetter, M. (1983). The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201-233. https://doi.org/10.2307/202051
• Hamilton, E. & Friesen, N. (2013). Online Education: A Science and Technology Studies Perspective / Éducation en ligne: Perspective des études en science et technologie. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La Revue Canadienne de l’apprentissage et de La Technologie, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.21432/T2001C
• Hannon, J. & Al-Mahmood, R. (2014). The place of theory in educational technology research. En Rhetoric and reality: Critical perspectives on educational technology: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ASCILITE Conference (pp. 745–750).
• Hayles, N. K. (2007). Hyper and Deep Attention: The Generational Divide in Cognitive Modes. Profession, 2007(1), 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1632/prof.2007.2007.1.187
• Hayles, N. K. (2012). How we think: Digital media and contemporary technogenesis. Chicago ; London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Hayles, N. K. (2016). Cognitive assemblages: Technical agency and human interactions. Critical Inquiry, 43(1), 32–55.
• Hew, K. F., Lan, M., Tang, Y., Jia, C., & Lo, C. K. (2019). Where is the “theory” within the field of educational technology research? British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 956-971. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12770
• Honan, E. (2010). Mapping discourses in teachers’ talk about using digital texts in classrooms. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(2), 179-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596301003679701
• Ibrahim, A. A. (2015). Evolutionary Nature of the Definition of Educational Technology. International Journal of Social Sciences & Education, 5(2), 233-239.
• Jameson, J. (2019). Developing critical and theoretical approaches to educational technology research and practice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 951-955. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12775
• Januszewski, A. (2001). Educational technology: The development of a concept. Englewood, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited.
• Jones, C. & Czerniewicz, L. (2011). Theory in learning technology. Research in Learning Technology, 19, 173-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/21567069.2011.632491
• Jones, C. & Kennedy, G. (2011). Stepping beyond the paradigm wars: Pluralist methods for research in learning technology. Research in Learning Technology, 19(sup1), 7798. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v19s1/7798
• Kimmons, R. & Johnstun, K. (2019). Navigating Paradigms in Educational Technology. TechTrends, 63(5), 631-641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00407-0
• Kirschner, P. A.& Kester, L. (2016). Towards a Research Agenda for Educational Technology Research. En N. Rushby & D. W. Surry (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Learning Technology (pp. 523-541). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118736494.ch27
• Knight, S., Allen, L., Gibson, A., McNamara, D. & Buckingham Shum, S. (2017). Writing analytics literacy: Bridging from research to practice (pp. 496-497). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3029425
• Kroes, P. & Verbeek, P.-P. (Eds.). (2014). The Moral Status of Technical Artefacts (Vol. 17). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7914-3
• Lai, J. W. M. & Bower, M. (2019). How is the use of technology in education evaluated? A systematic review. Computers & Education, 133, 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.010
• Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A. & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A Systematic Study of the Published Literature 2008-2012. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), 202-227. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455
• Martínez Bonafé, J. (2001). Arqueología del concepto «compromiso social» en el discurso pedagógico y de formación docente. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa (REDIE), 3(1). Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=15503106
• Martínez, F. & Prendes, M. P. (2003). ¿Adónde va la educación en un mundo de tecnologías? En F. Martínez (Ed.), Redes de comunicación en la enseñanza (pp. 281-300). Barcelona: Paidós. Recuperado de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=756021
• Martínez Sánchez, F. (2007). La integración escolar de las nuevas tecnologías. En J. Cabero (Ed.), Nuevas Tecnologías aplicadas a la educación (pp. 21-40). Madrid: McGraw-Hill Interamericana de España S.L.
• Mayer, R. E. (2019). Computer Games in Education. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 531-549. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102744
• McCann, E. (2011). Urban Policy Mobilities and Global Circuits of Knowledge: Toward a Research Agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1), 107-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2010.520219
• McFarlane, A. E. (2019). Devices and desires: Competing visions of a good education in the digital age. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1125-1136. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12764
• Menashy, F. (2015). Understanding the roles of non-state actors in global governance: Evidence from the Global Partnership for Education. Journal of Education Policy, 31(1), 98-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1093176
• Mintrom, M. & Vergari, S. (1998). Policy Networks and Innovation Diffusion: The Case of State Education Reforms. The Journal of Politics, 60(1), 126-148. https://doi.org/10.2307/2648004
• Moreno, G. A., Jimenez, J. A. & Puche, W. S. (2016). Ubiquitous Personal Learning Environment model (uPLEMO). En 2016 Technologies Applied to Electronics Teaching (TAEE) (pp. 1-8). https://doi.org/10.1109/TAEE.2016.7528383
• Nichols, R. S., & Allen-Brown, V. (1996). Critical Theory and Education Technology. En D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 226-252). Simon & Schuster.
• Oliver, M. (2011). Technological determinism in educational technology research: Some alternative ways of thinking about the relationship between learning and technology: Educational technology and determinism. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(5), 373-384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00406.x
• Oliver, M. (2016). What is Technology. En N. Rushby & D. Surry (Eds.), Wiley Handbook of Learning Technology (Edición: 1). Chichester, UK ; Malden, MA: Wiley Handbooks in Education.
• Pangrazio, L. & Selwyn, N. (2018). ‘Personal data literacies’: A critical literacies approach to enhancing understandings of personal digital data. New Media & Society, 1461444818799523. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818799523
• Papert, S. (1981). Computers and computer cultures. Creative Computing, 7(3), 82-92.
• Parejo, N. & Olmedo, E. M. (2017). ANÁLISIS DEL PLE Y OLE DE UN GRUPO DE INVESTIGACIÓN DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE GRANADA. UN ESTUDIO DE CASOS CON CANVAS, 6.
• Player-Koro, C., Bergviken Rensfeldt, A. &y Selwyn, N. (2017). Selling tech to teachers: Education trade shows as policy events. Journal of Education Policy, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1380232
• Prendes, M. P. (1997). Tecnología Educativa. Proyecto docente presentado en el concurso de acceso a la plaza de Profesor Titular de Universidad (Universidad de Murcia). Murcia.
• Provost, F. & Fawcett, T. (2013). Data Science and its Relationship to Big Data and Data-Driven Decision Making. Big Data, 1(1), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2013.1508
• Reeves, T. C. & Oh, E. G. (2017). The goals and methods of educational technology research over a quarter century (1989–2014). Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(2), 325–339.
• Reiser, R. A. (2001). A History of Instructional Design and Technology: Part I: A History of Instructional Media. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 53-64. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/30220299
• Rodríguez, J. & Martínez-Bonafé, J. (2016). Libros de texto y control del curriculum en el contexto de la sociedad digital. Cadernos CEDES, 36(100), 319-336. https://doi.org/10.1590/cc0101-32622016171317
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition (Edición: 5th Edition.). New York: Simon & Schuster.
• Saettler, P. (1978). The Roots of Educational Technology. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 15(1), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0033039780150102
• Saettler, P. (1990). Evolution of American Educational Technology (Edición: Revised). Englewood, Colo: Libraries Unlimited Inc.
• Saeverot, H. & Kvam, V. (2019). An alternative model of researching educational practice: A pedagogic–stereoscopic point of view. British Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3493
• Salinas, J. (1991). Proyecto docente presentado en el concurso de acceso a la plaza de Profesor Titular de Universidad del área de Didáctica y Organización Escolar (Universitat de les Illes Balears). Palma de Mallorca.
• Sancho, J. M. (Ed.). (1994). Para una tecnología educativa. Horsori.
• Sarramona, F. & Fernández, A. (1978). La educación. Constantes y problemática actual. CEAC, Barcelona.
• Scott, D. (2005). Critical realism and empirical research methods in education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39(4), 633-646. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2005.00460.x
• Scott, David. (2013). Education, Epistemology and Critical Realism (1.a ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203883099
• Selwyn, N. (2016a). Is technology good for education? Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
• Selwyn, N. (2016b). ¿Nuevas culturas del aprendizaje ?: (Una conversación con Linda Castañeda). Boletín de la Institución Libre de Enseñanza, (104), 51-77.
• Selwyn, N. (2017). Education and technology: Critical questions. En G. Ferreira, L. Da Silva Rosado, & J. Sá Carvalho (Eds.), Education and Technology: Critical approaches (pp. 105-122). Rio de Janeiro: SESES. Recuperado de https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/rmyg8/
• Shannon, C& Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: The University of Illinois Press.
• Siemens, G. & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE review, 46(5), 30.
• Spector, J. M. (2016). Foundations of educational technology: Integrative approaches and interdisciplinary perspectives (Second edition). New York: Routledge.
• Spring, J. (2012). Globalization of Education. International Journal of Chinese Education, 1(2), 139-176. https://doi.org/10.1163/22125868-12340002
• Starkey, L. (2012). Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age (Edición: 1). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Stiegler, B. (2015). States of shock: Stupidity and knowledge in the twenty-first century. Cambridge ; Malden, MA: Polity.
• Stone, D. (2008). Global Public Policy, Transnational Policy Communities, and Their Networks. Policy Studies Journal, 36(1), 19-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00251.x
• Strydom, S. & Fourie-Malherbe, M. (2019). Pluralism as a Vehicle for Theory-Building in Educational Technology Research. En J. Huisman & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and Method in Higher Education Research (Vol. 5, pp. 173-191). Emerald.
• Swan, M. (2013). The Quantified Self: Fundamental Disruption in Big Data Science and Biological Discovery. Big Data, 1(2), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2012.0002
• Taffel, S. (2016). Perspectives on the postdigital: Beyond rhetorics of progress and novelty. Convergence, 22(3), 324-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856514567827
• Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C. & Schmid, R. F. (2011). What Forty Years of Research Says About the Impact of Technology on Learning: A Second-Order Meta-Analysis and Validation Study. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4-28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310393361
• Thomson, P., Hall, C. & Jones, K. (2010). Maggies day: A smallscale analysis of English education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 25(5), 639-656. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680931003783346
• Trisha Greenhalgh & Jill Russell. (2009). Evidence-Based Policymaking: A Critique. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 52(2), 304-318. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.0.0085
• Vázquez-Cano, E. & Meneses, E. L. (2015). La filosofía educativa de los MOOC y la educación universitaria. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 18(2), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.18.2.14261
• Veletsianos, G. & Moe, R. (2017, Abril). The Rise of Educational Technology as a Sociocultural and Ideological Phenomenon. Educause Review. Recuperado de https://er.educause.edu/articles/2017/4/the-rise-of-educational-technology-as-a-sociocultural-and-ideological-phenomenon
• Waller, M. A. & Fawcett, S. E. (2013). Data Science, Predictive Analytics, and Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform Supply Chain Design and Management. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(2), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12010
• Watters, A. (2016). The Curse of the Monsters of Education Technology. Amazon.
• Webster, M. D. (2017). Philosophy of Technology Assumptions in Educational Technology Leadership. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 25–36. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jeductechsoci.20.1.25.pdf
• West, R. E& Borup, J. (2014). An analysis of a decade of research in 10 instructional design and technology journals: Analysis of IDT research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(4), 545-556. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12081
• Whitson, J. R. (2013). Gaming the quantified self. Surveillance and Society, 11(1-2), 163-176. Scopus
• Williamson, B. (2013). The future of the curriculum: School knowledge in the digital age. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
• Williamson, B. (2015). Political computational thinking: Policy networks, digital governance and learning to code. Critical Policy Studies, 10(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2015.1052003
• Williamson, B. (2017). Moulding student emotions through computational psychology: Affective learning technologies and algorithmic governance. Educational Media International, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2017.1407080
• Williamson, B., Potter, J. & Eynon, R. (2019). New research problems and agendas in learning, media and technology: The editors’ wishlist. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(2), 87-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1614953
• Winner, L. (1980). Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121-136.
• Yanchar, S. C& Williams, D. D. (2006). Reconsidering the compatibility thesis and eclecticism: Five proposed guidelines for method use. Educational researcher, 35(9), 3–12.
• Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M. & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
• Zhao, Y. (2017). What works may hurt: Side effects in education. Journal of Educational Change, 18(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-016-9294-4
• Zheng, L. (2015). A systematic literature review of design-based research from 2004 to 2013. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 399-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0036-z