Does gender diversity on corporate boards reduce information aymmetry in equity markets?

  1. David Abad 1
  2. María Encarnación Lucas-Pérez 2
  3. Antonio Minguez-Vera 2
  4. José Yagüe 2
  1. 1 Universitat d'Alacant
    info

    Universitat d'Alacant

    Alicante, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05t8bcz72

  2. 2 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

Revista:
Business Research Quarterly

ISSN: 2340-9444 2340-9436

Año de publicación: 2017

Volumen: 20

Número: 3

Páginas: 192-205

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.BRQ.2017.04.001 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Business Research Quarterly

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Examinamos la relación entre la diversidad de género en los directorios de las corporaciones y los niveles de asimetría de información en el mercado de valores. La evidencia anterior sugiere que la presencia de mujeres en los consejos de administración aumenta la cantidad y calidad de la divulgación pública por parte de las empresas y, por lo tanto, esperamos que las empresas con mayor diversidad de género en sus consejos muestren niveles más bajos de asimetría de información en el mercado. Utilizando una muestra española, proxies para la asimetría de información estimada a partir de datos de alta frecuencia junto con la metodología del panel del sistema GMM, encontramos que la diversidad de género en los directorios se asocia negativamente con el nivel de asimetría de información en el mercado de valores.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adams, R.B., Ferreira, D., Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J. Financ. Econ. 94:2 (2009), 291–309.
  • Ajinkya, B., Bhorjraj, S., Sengupta, P., The association between outside directors, institutional investors and the properties of management earnings forecasts. J. Account. Res. 43:3 (2005), 343–376.
  • Alexander, J., Nuchols, B., Bloom, J., Lee, S.D., Organizational demography and turnover: an examination of multiform and nonlinear heterogeneity. Hum. Relat. 48:5 (1995), 1455–1480.
  • Ambrose, M.L., Schminke, M., Sex differences in business ethics: the importance of perceptions. J. Manag. Issues 11:4 (1999), 454–474.
  • Amihud, Y., Mendelson, H., Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread. J. Financ. Econ. 17:2 (1986), 223–249.
  • Anderson, C.R., Reeb, M.D., Founding-family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P500. J. Finance 58:3 (2003), 1301–1328.
  • Arellano, M., Bond, S., Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econ. Stud. 58:2 (1991), 277–297.
  • Armstrong, C., Guay, W., Weber, J., The role of information and financial reporting in corporate governance and debt contracting. J. Account. Econom. 50:2–3 (2010), 179–234.
  • Bear, S., Rahman, N., Post, C., The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. J. Bus. Ethics 97:2 (2010), 207–221.
  • Beck, T., Levine, R., Loayza, N., Finance and the sources of growth. J. Financ. Econ. 58:1–2 (2000), 261–300.
  • Beekes, W., Brown, P., Do better-governed Australian firms make more informative disclosures?. J. Bus. Finance Account. 33:3–4 (2006), 422–450.
  • Bhojraj, S., Sengupta, P., Effect of corporate governance on bond ratings and yields: the role of institutional investors and outside directors. J. Bus. 76:3 (2003), 455–475.
  • Blau, P.M., Inequality and Heterogeneity. 1977, Free Press, New York, Glencoe, IL.
  • Blundell, R., Bond, S.R., Initial conditions and moment conditions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econom. 87:1 (1998), 115–143.
  • Brammer, S., Millington, A., Pavelin, S., Corporate reputation and women on the board. Br. J. Manage. 20:1 (2009), 17–29.
  • Brown, S., Hillegeist, S.A., How disclosure quality affects the level of information asymmetry. Rev. Account. Stud. 12:2–3 (2007), 443–477.
  • Brown, S., Hillegeist, S.A., Lo, K., Conference calls and information asymmetry. J. Account. Econom. 37:3 (2004), 343–366.
  • Byard, D., Li, Y., Weintrop, J., Corporate governance and the quality of financial analysts’ information. J. Account. Public Policy 25:5 (2006), 609–625.
  • Byrnes, J., Miller, D., Schafer, W., Gender differences in risk taking: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 125:3 (1999), 367–383.
  • Cai, C.X., Keasey, K., Short, H., Corporate governance and information efficiency in security markets. Eur. Financ. Manage. 12:5 (2006), 763–787.
  • Carter, D.A., Simkins, B.J., Simpson, W.G., Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financ. Rev. 38:1 (2003), 33–53.
  • Chen, W.P., Chung, H., Lee, C., Liao, W.L., Corporate governance and equity liquidity: analysis of S&P transparency and disclosure rankings. Corp. Gov. 15:4 (2007), 644–660.
  • Chung, K.H., Elder, J., Kim, J.C., Corporate governance and liquidity. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 26:5 (2010), 265–291.
  • Cormier, D., Ledoux, M.J., Magnan, M., Aerts, W., Corporate governance and information asymmetry between managers and investors. Corp. Gov. 10:5 (2010), 574–589.
  • Daily, C.M., Dalton, D.R., Women in the boardroom: a business imperative. J. Bus. Strategy 24:5 (2003), 8–9.
  • Dezso, C.L., Ross, D.G., Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strateg. Manage. J. 33:9 (2012), 1072–1089.
  • Diamond, M., Verrecchia, R., Disclosure, liquidity and the cost of capital. J. Finance 46:4 (1991), 1325–1359.
  • Eagly, A.H., Johnson, B.T., Gender and leadership style: a meta analysis. Psychol. Bull. 108:2 (1990), 233–256.
  • Easley, D., Kiefer, N., O'Hara, M., Paperman, J.B., Liquidity, information, and infrequently traded stocks. J. Finance 51:4 (1996), 1405–1436.
  • Easley, D., O'Hara, M., Information and the cost of capital. J. Finance 59:4 (2004), 1553–1583.
  • Easley, D., O'Hara, M., Paperman, J., Financial analysts and information-based trade. J. Financ. Mark. 1:2 (1998), 175–201.
  • Eng, L.L., Mak, Y.T., Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. J. Account. Public Policy 22:4 (2003), 325–346.
  • Faccio, M., Marchica, M.T., Mura, R., CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation. J. Corp. Finance 39 (2016), 193–209.
  • Fama, E.F., Jensen, M.C., Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econ. 26:2 (1983), 301–325.
  • Farrell, K.A., Hersch, P.L., Additions to corporate boards: the effect of gender. J. Corp. Finance 11:1–2 (2005), 85–106.
  • Francoeur, C., Laballe, R., Sinclair-Desgagne, B., Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. J. Bus. Ethics 81:1 (2008), 83–95.
  • Goh, B.W., Lee, J., Ng, J., Yong, K., The effect of board independence on information asymmetry. Eur. Account. Rev. 25:1 (2016), 155–182.
  • Glosten, L.R., Milgrom, P.R., Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders. J. Financ. Econ. 14:1 (1985), 71–100.
  • Gul, F.A., Hutchinson, M., Lai, K., Gender-diverse boards and properties of analyst earnings forecasts. Account. Horiz. 27:3 (2013), 511–538.
  • Gul, F.A., Srinidhi, B., Ng, A.C., Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness of stock prices?. J. Account. Econom. 51:3 (2011), 314–338.
  • Gulzar, M.A., Wang, Z., Corporate governance characteristics and earnings management: empirical evidence from Chinese listed firms. Int. J. Account. Financ. Report. 1:1 (2011), 133–151.
  • Harel, G.H., Tzafrir, S.S., Baruch, Y., Achieving organizational effectiveness through promotion of women into managerial positions: HRM practice focus. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manage. 14:2 (2003), 247–263.
  • Healy, P., Palepu, K., Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: a review of the empirical disclosure literature. J. Account. Econom. 31:1 (2001), 404–440.
  • Heflin, F., Shaw, K.W., Wild, J.J., Disclosure quality and market liquidity. Contemp. Account. Res. 22:4 (2005), 829–865.
  • Heid, B., Langer, J., Larch, M., Income and democracy: evidence from system GMM estimates. Econ. Lett. 116:2 (2012), 166–169.
  • Hillman, A.J., Dalziel, T., Boards of directors and firm performance: integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Acad. Manage. Rev. 28:3 (2003), 383–396.
  • Hillman, A.J., Shropshire, C., Cannella, A.A., Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Acad. Manage. J. 50:4 (2007), 941–952.
  • Huang, R., Stoll, H., Dealer versus auction markets: a paired comparison of execution costs on NASDAQ and NYSE. J. Financ. Econ. 41:3 (1996), 313–357.
  • Hunton, J.E., Libby, R., Mazza, C.L., Financial reporting transparency and earnings management. Account. Rev. 81:1 (2006), 135–158.
  • Jackson, S., Joshi, A., Erhardt, N., Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. J. Manage. 29:6 (2003), 801–830.
  • Jelinek, M., Adler, N.J., Women: world-class managers for global competition. Acad. Manage. Exec. 2:1 (1988), 11–19.
  • Jennings, W., Schnatterly, K., Seguin, P., Institutional ownership, information, and liquidity. Adv. Financ. Econ. 7 (2002), 41–71.
  • Jensen, M.C., Meckling, W.H., Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency cost and ownership structure. J. Financ. Econ. 3:4 (1976), 305–360.
  • Jiang, C., Kim, J., Trading costs of non-US stocks on the New York Stock Exchange: the effect of institutional ownership, analyst following, and market regulation. J. Financ. Res. 28:3 (2005), 439–459.
  • Joy, L., Advancing women leaders: the connection between women board directors and women corporate officers. Catalyst, 2008 New York.
  • Kanagaretnam, K., Lobo, G.J., Whalen, D.J., Does good corporate governance reduce information asymmetry around quarterly earnings announcements?. J. Account. Public Policy 26:4 (2007), 497–522.
  • Kang, S., Kumar, P., Lee, H., Agency and corporate investment: the role of executive compensation and corporate governance. J. Bus. 79:3 (2006), 1127–1147.
  • Kaplan, S.E., Ravenscroft, S.P., The reputation effects of earnings management in the internal labor market. Bus. Ethics Q. 14:3 (2004), 453–478.
  • Karamanou, I., Vafeas, N., The association between corporate boards, audit committees, and management earnings forecasts: an empirical analysis. J. Account. Res. 43:3 (2005), 453–486.
  • Krishnan, G.V., Parsons, L.M., Getting to the bottom line: an exploration of gender and earnings quality. J. Bus. Ethics 78:1 (2008), 65–76.
  • Kyle, A., Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica 53:6 (1985), 1315–1335.
  • La Porta, R., Lopez De Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Corporate ownership around the world. J. Finance 54:2 (1999), 471–517.
  • Lau, D.C., Murnighan, J.K., Demographic diversity and fault lines: the compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Acad. Manage. Rev. 23:2 (1998), 325–340.
  • Loden, M., Feminine leadership, or how to succeed in business without being one of the boys. Times Books, 1985 New York.
  • López-Gutiérrez, C., Sanfilippo-Azofra, S., Torre-Olmo, B., Investment decisions of companies in financial distress. BRQ Bus. Res. Q. 18:3 (2015), 174–187.
  • Lundeberg, M.A., Fox, P.W., Puncochar, J., Highly confident but wrong: gender differences and similarities in confidence judgments. J. Educ. Psychol. 86:1 (1994), 114–121.
  • MacLeod Heminway, J., Sex, trust, and corporate boards. Hastings Womens Law J 18 (2007), 173–193.
  • Martín Ugedo, J.F., Minguez Vera, A., Firm performance and women on the board: evidence for Spanish Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Fem. Econ. 20:3 (2014), 136–162.
  • Mateos de Cabo, R., Gimeno, R., Mangas, L.E., Disentangling discrimination on Spanish boards of directors. Corp. Gov. 19:1 (2011), 77–95.
  • Milliken, F.J., Martins, L.L., Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Acad. Manage. Rev. 21:2 (1996), 402–433.
  • Morck, R., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., Management ownership and market valuation. J. Financ. Econ. 20:1–2 (1988), 293–315.
  • Myers, S., Majluf, N., Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. J. Financ. Econ. 13:2 (1984), 187–221.
  • Nalikka, A., Impact of gender diversity on the extent of voluntary disclosure in annual reports. J. Account. Tax. 1:1 (2009), 101–113.
  • Nielsen, S., Huse, M., Women directors’ contribution to board decision-making and strategic involvement: the role of equality perception. Eur. Manage. Rev. 7:1 (2010), 16–29.
  • Pan, Y., Sparks, J.R., Predictors, consequence, and measurement of ethical judgments: review and meta-analysis. J. Bus. Res. 65:1 (2012), 84–91.
  • Pfeffer, J., Organizational demography. Cummings, L.L., Staw, B.M., (eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 5, 1983, JAI Press, Greenwich, C.T., 299–357.
  • Pound, J., Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. J. Financ. Econ. 20:1–2 (1988), 237–265.
  • Powell, M., Ansic, D., Gender differences in risk behaviour in financial decision-making: an experimental analysis. J. Econ. Psychol. 18:6 (1997), 605–628.
  • Pucheta-Martínez, M.C., Bel-Oms, I., Olcina-Sempere, G., Corporate governance female directors and quality of financial information. Bus. Ethics 25:4 (2016), 363–385.
  • Qi, B., Tian, G., The impact of audit committees’ personal characteristics on earnings management: evidence from China. J. Appl. Bus. Res. 28:6 (2012), 1331–1343.
  • Richard, O.C., Barnett, T., Dwyer, S., Chadwick, K., Cultural diversity in management, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation dimensions. Acad. Manage. J. 47:2 (2004), 255–266.
  • Roulstone, D.T., Analyst following and market liquidity. Contemp. Account. Res. 20:3 (2003), 551–578.
  • Shannon, C.E., A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27:3 (1948), 379–423.
  • Srinidhi, B., Gul, F.A., Tsui, J., Female directors and earnings quality. Contemp. Account. Res. 28:5 (2011), 1610–1644.
  • Stirling, A., On the economics and analysis of diversity. 1998 Retrieved from http://www.uis.unesco.org [cited 14.02.14].
  • Sun, J., Liu, G., Lan, G., Does female directorship on independent audit committees constrain earnings management?. J. Bus. Ethics 99:3 (2011), 369–382.
  • Tejersen, S., Barbosa Couto, E., Morais Francisco, P., Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi-country study of board diversity. J. Manage. Gov. 20:3 (2016), 447–483.
  • Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., Singh, V., Women directors on corporate boards: a review and research agenda. Corp. Gov. 17:3 (2009), 320–337.
  • Uotila, J., Maula, M.V.J., Keil, T., Zahra, S.A., Exploration, exploitation and financial performance: analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strateg. Manage. J. 30:2 (2009), 221–222.
  • Upadhyay, A., Zeng, H., Gender and ethnic diversity on boards and corporate information environment. J. Bus. Res. 67:11 (2014), 2456–2463.
  • Yan, Y., Zhang, S., An improved estimation method and empirical properties of the probability of informed trading. J. Bank. Finance 36:2 (2012), 454–467.
  • Ye, K.T., Zhang, R., Rezaee, Z., Does top executive gender diversity affect earnings quality? A large sample analysis of Chinese listed firms. Adv. Account. 26:1 (2010), 47–54.
  • Young, M., Peng, M.W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G.D., Jiang, Y., Corporate governance in emerging economies: a review of the principal–principal perspective. J. Manage. Stud. 45:1 (2008), 196–220.
  • Zelechowski, D.D., Bilimoria, D., Characteristics of women and men corporate inside directors. Corp. Gov. 12:3 (2004), 337–342.