¿Hacia la Ubersidad?Conflictos y contradicciones de la universidad digital

  1. Jordi Adell Segura 1
  2. Linda Castañeda Quintero 2
  3. Francesc M. Esteve Mon 1
  1. 1 Universitat Jaume I
    info

    Universitat Jaume I

    Castelló de la Plana, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02ws1xc11

  2. 2 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

Revista:
RIED: revista iberoamericana de educación a distancia

ISSN: 1138-2783

Año de publicación: 2018

Título del ejemplar: Hacia la universidad digital: ¿dónde estamos y a dónde vamos?

Volumen: 21

Número: 2

Páginas: 51-68

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5944/RIED.21.2.20669 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: RIED: revista iberoamericana de educación a distancia

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

The university is an institution with a long history, which has fostered and survived multiple changes over the centuries. In recent decades, changes seem to be accelerating, partly linked to technology development. Digitisation is having a significant impact on how university develops its functions, but these processes are not linear or straightforward and will translate into complex, ambivalent and conflicting changes. This paper aims to analyse some of the most relevant effects of the implementation of digital technologies in the university teaching and research, from a socio-material point of view. In other words, we will not focus on these technologies as objects, neither on people on this context, but rather on how the relationships established between subjects and objects affect the action that takes place in the university, as a complex reality. To do this, the present article presents an analysis ranging from the particular to the general. Firstly, it analyses how “the digital” affects to teaching and research, then It will sketch some ideas about possible futures linked to digital technology and, finally, will propose some ideas on how to analyse the impact of technology in the university from a critical perspective.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abeysekera, L. y Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research and Development, 34(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
  • Area, M., San Nicolás, M. y Fariña, E. (2010). Buenas prácticas de aulas virtuales en la docencia universitaria semipresencial. Teoría de la Educación. Educación y Cultura en la Sociedad de la Información, 11(1). Recuperado de http://revistas.usal.es/index.php/revistatesi/article/view/5787
  • Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093022000043065
  • Barak, M., Hussein-Farraj, R. y Dori, Y. J. (2016). On-campus or online: examining self-regulation and cognitive transfer skills in different learning settings. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0035-9
  • Barnett, R. (2016). Understanding the University: Institution, idea, possibilities. London; New York: Routledge.
  • Bartolomé, A. R., Bellver, C., Castañeda, L. J. y Adell, J. (2017). Blockchain en educación: introducción y crítica al estado de la cuestión. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 61, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2017.61.915
  • Bricall, J. M. (1997). Visión de la Universidad en Europa: problemas diversos, soluciones comunes. En Los nuevos desafíos de la Universidad. Madrid: Institución Libre de Enseñanza.
  • Buckingham Shum, S., Sándor, Á., Goldsmith, R., Wang, X., Bass, R. y McWilliams, M. (2016). Reflecting on reflective writing analytics: Assessment challenges and iterative evaluation of a prototype tool. En Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (pp. 213–222). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2883851.2883955
  • Cabero, J. (2005). Las TIC y las universidades: retos, posibilidades y preocupaciones. Revista de la Educación Superior, XXXIV (3), (135). Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/resumen.oa?id=60413505
  • Castañeda, L. (2015). Investigación, conocimiento y participación en la academia 2.0: de la torre de marfil a la galería de los espejos. Temps d’Educació, (49), 89-104. Recuperado de http://www.raco.cat/index.php/TempsEducacio/article/view/303524
  • Castañeda, L. y Adell, J. (2013). Entornos personales de aprendizaje: claves para el ecosistema educativo en red. Alcoy: Editorial Marfil. Recuperado de http://www.um.es/ple/libro/
  • Castañeda, L., Dabbagh, N. y Torres-Kompen, R. (2017). Personal learning environments: Research-Based practices, frameworks and challenges. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2017.1.229
  • Corominas, A. y Sacristán, V. (2010). Construir el futuro de la universidad pública. Barcelona: Icaria editorial.
  • Costa, C. (2013). The habitus of digital scholars. Research in Learning Technology, 21(1), 21274. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21.21274
  • Costa, C. (2016). Double gamers: academics between fields. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(7), 993-1013. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2014.982861
  • Dabbagh, N. y Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
  • De la Cruz, M. Á. (2003). Necesidad y objetivos de la formación pedagógica del profesor universitario. Revista de Educación, 331, 35-66. Recuperado de https://sede.educacion.gob.es/publiventa/detalle.action?cod=11294
  • Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S. y Tinkler, J. (2006). New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467-494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057
  • Fecher, B. y Friesike, S. (2014). Open science: one term, five schools of thought. En S. Bartling y S. Friesike (Eds.), Opening science. The evolving guide on how the Internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly publishing (pp. 17-47). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_2
  • Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming technology. Oxford University Press.
  • Fenwick, T. y Edwards, R. (2017). How sociomaterial approaches could support higher education as a critical practice. En B. Leibowitz, V. Bozalek, y P. Kahn (Eds.), Theorising learning to teach in higher education (pp. 34-52). London; New York: Routledge. Recuperado de https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781317195733/chapters/10.4324%2F9781315559605-10
  • Ferguson, R. y Buckingham Shum, S. (2012). Social learning analytics: five approaches (pp. 23-33). Presentado en 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1145/2330601.2330616
  • Fitzgerald, T. y Gunter, H. M. (2017). Debating the agenda: the incremental uberisation of the field. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 49(4), 257-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2017.1342980
  • Floridi, L. (2017). The fourth revolution: how the Infosphere Is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gunkel, D. J. (2017). Rage Against the Machine: Rethinking Education in the Face of Technological Unemployment. En K. LaGrandeur y J. J. Hughes (Eds.), Surviving the machine age (pp. 147-162). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51165-8_10
  • Gurría, A. (2017, Noviembre 24). “Unprecedented unpredictability: digital transformation. The future of jobs and trade in a digitalised world”. Recuperado de http://www.oecd.org/employment/gsg-future-of-jobs-in-digitalised-world-nov-2017.htm
  • Hall, G. (2016). The Uberfication of the University. Minnesota, USA: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Hamilton, E. C. (2016). Technology and the politics of university reform: the social shaping of online education. New York: Palmgrave Macmillan.
  • Hamilton, E. y Feenberg, A. (2005). The technical codes of online education. E-learning and Digital Media, 2(2), 104–121. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.2.1
  • Hand, E. (2010). Citizen science: People power. Nature News, 466(7307), 685-687. https://doi.org/10.1038/466685a
  • Jasanoff, S. (2015). Future imperfect: science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity. En S. Jasanoff y S.-H. Kim (Eds.), Dreamscapes of modernity: sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Laviña, J. y Mengual, L. (Eds.). (2008). Libro blanco de la universidad digital 2010. Madrid: Ariel-Fundación Telefónica. Recuperado de https://www.fundaciontelefonica.com/arte_cultura/publicaciones-listado/pagina-item-publicaciones/itempubli/22/
  • Llopis Nebot, Á. M. (2017, Septiembre 21). Pensamiento reflexivo en el Prácticum I del alumnado de Grado de Maestro en Educación Primaria a través de diarios online (Ph.D. Thesis). Universitat Jaume I. Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/10803/430854
  • Manzano Arrondo, V. (2012). La universidad comprometida. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco-Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Hegoa. Recuperado de http://publicaciones.hegoa.ehu.es/uploads/pdfs/212/Univ_comprometida.pdf
  • Martínez, F. y Prendes, M. P. (2003). ¿Adónde va la educación en un mundo de tecnologías? En F. Martínez (Ed.), Redes de comunicación en la enseñanza (pp. 281-300). Barcelona: Paidós. Recuperado de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=756021
  • Martínez, M. y Payà, M. (2007). La formación de la ciudadanía en el Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior. En J. L. García Garrido (Ed.), Formar ciudadanos europeos. Madrid: Academia Europea de Ciencias y Artes.
  • Michavila, F. y Calvo, B. (1999). La Universidad española hacia Europa. Madrid: Fundación Alfonso Martín Escudero.
  • Mulder, M., Weigel, T. y Collings, K. (2008). El concepto de competencia en el desarrollo de la educación y formación profesional en algunos Estados miembros de la UE: un análisis crítico. Profesorado: Revista de Curriculum y Formación del Profesorado, 12(3), 7. Recuperado de https://www.ugr.es/~recfpro/rev123ART6.pdf
  • Murphy, M. y Costa, C. (Eds.). (2015). Theory as method in research: on Bourdieu, social theory and education. London; New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Nouri, J. (2016). The flipped classroom: for active, effective and increased learning – especially for low achievers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13, 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0032-z
  • Nurvala, J.-P. (2015). ‘Uberisation’ is the future of the digitalised labour market. European View, 14(2), 231-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-015-0378-y
  • Olssen, M. y Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: from the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500108718
  • Ortega y Gasset, J. (1930). Misión de la universidad. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
  • Pardo, A., Jovanovic, J., Dawson, S., Gašević, D. y Mirriahi, N. (2017). Using learning analytics to scale the provision of personalised feedback: Learning analytics to scale personalised feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12592
  • Peña-López, I. (2013). El PLE de investigación-docencia: el aprendizaje como enseñanza. En L. Castañeda y J. Adell (Eds.), Entornos personales de aprendizaje: claves para el ecosistema educativo en red (pp. 93-110). Alcoy: Marfil. Recuperado de https://digitum.um.es/xmlui/bitstream/10201/30413/1/capitulo6.pdf
  • Peters, M. A. (2017). Technological unemployment: educating for the fourth industrial revolution. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 5(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.22381/JSME5120172
  • Player-Koro, C., Bergviken Rensfeldt, A. y Selwyn, N. (2017). Selling tech to teachers: education trade shows as policy events. Journal of Education Policy, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1380232
  • Prendes, M. P. y Roman, M. (2017). Entornos personales de aprendizaje: Una visión actual de cómo aprender con tecnologías. Barcelona: Octaedro.
  • Roorda, S. T. (2013). Towards the ‘neoliberal’ university. Higher education and innovation in the knowledge economy (Doctoral dissertation). Maastricht University, Maastricht. Recuperado de https://www.academia.edu/9161870/Towards_the_Neoliberal_University_Higher_Education_and_Innovation_in_the_Knowledge_Economy
  • Salinas, J. (1999). Enseñanza flexible, aprendizaje abierto. Las redes como herramienta para la formación. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, (10). https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.1999.10.567
  • Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A. y Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0
  • Selwyn, N. (2014). Digital technology and the contemporary university: degrees of digitization. London: Society for Research into Higher Education. Recuperado de https://www.amazon.com/Digital-Technology-Contemporary-University-digitization-ebook/dp/B00KIRAZ4G/
  • Srnicek, N. (2016). Platform Capitalism. Cambridge, UK ; Malden, MA: Theory Redux. Recuperado de https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Platform+Capitalism-p-9781509504909
  • Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4
  • Tur, G. y Marín, V. (2015). Exploring students’ attitudes and beliefs towards e-portfolios and technology in education. Enseñanza & Teaching, 33(1), 57-82. https://doi.org/10.14201/et20153315782
  • Uber-U is already here. (6 de mayo de 2016). Recuperado de https://teachonline.ca/tools-trends/exploring-future-education/uber-u-already-here
  • Veletsianos, G. (2016). Social media in academia: networked scholars. Nueva York: Routledge.
  • Veletsianos, G. y Stewart, B. (2016). Discreet openness: scholars’ selective and intentional self-disclosures online. Social Media + Society, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116664222
  • Vlachopoulos, D. y Makri, A. (2017). The effect of games and simulations on higher education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0062-1
  • Weller, M. (2011). The digital scholar: how technology is transforming academic practice. London: Bloomsbury Academic. Recuperado de https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/the-digital-scholar-9781849666268/
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet