El papel de la sílaba en la codificación posicional de las representaciones ortográficas

Referencias bibliográficas

• Acha, J. & Perea, M. (2008). The effect of neighborhood frequency in reading: Evidence with transposed-letter neighbors. Cognition, 108, 290-300. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.02.006.
• Acha, J. & Perea, M. (2010). Does kaniso activate CASINO? Input coding schemes and phonology in visual-word recognition. Experimental Psychology, 57, 245-251. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000029.
• Álvarez, C., Carreiras M. & de Vega, M. (2000). Syllable-frequency effect in visual word recognition: Evidence of sequential-type processing. Psicológica, 21, 341-374.
• Álvarez, C., Carreiras, M. & Perea, M. (2004). Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 427-452. doi:10.1080/01690960344000242.
• Álvarez, C., Carreiras, M. & Taft, M. (2001). Syllables and morphemes: Contrasting frequency effects in Spanish. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 545-555. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.545
• Álvarez, C., de Vega, M. & Carreiras, M. (1998). La sílaba como unidad de activación léxica en la lectura de palabras trisílabas. Psicothema, 10, 371-386.
• Ans, B., Carbonnel, S., & Valdois, S. (1998). A connectionist multiple-trace model for polysyllabic word reading. Psychological Review, 105, 678-723. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.4.678-723.
• Becker, C. A. (1976). Allocation of attention during visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 556-566. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.2.4.556.
• Becker, C. A. (1979). Semantic context and word frequency in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 252-259. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.5.2.252.
• Becker, C. A. (1985). What do we really know about semantic context effects during reading? In D. Besner, T. G. Waller & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading Research. Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 5, pp. 125-66). London: Academic Press.
• Carreiras, M., Álvarez, C. &. de Vega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 766-780. doi:10.1006/jmla.1993.1038.
• Carreiras, M. & Perea, M. (2002). Masked priming effects with syllabic neighbors in the lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1228-1242. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.28.5.1228.
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R. & Ziegler, J. (2001). A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204.
• Conrad, M., Tamm, S., Carreiras, M. & Jacobs, A. M. (2010). Simulating syllable frequency effects within an interactive activation framework. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 861-893. doi:10.1080/09541440903356777.
• Davis, C. J. (1999). Match calculator [computer software available at http://www.pc.rhul.ac.uk/staff/c.davis/Utilities/MatchCalc/index.htm].
• Davis, C. J. (1999). The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 62(1-B). Tesis doctoral no publicada, Universidad de New South Wales.
• Davis, C. J. (2010). SOLAR versus SERIOL revisited. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 695-724. doi:10.1080/09541440903155682.
• Davis, C. J., & Perea, M. (2005). BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 665-671. doi:10.3758/BF03192738.
• Ferrand, L., Grainger, J. & Seguí, J. (1994). A study of masked form priming in picture and word naming. Memory & Cognition, 22, 431-441. doi:10.3758/BF03200868.
• Ferrand, L., Segui, J. & Grainger, J. (1996). Masked priming of word and picture naming: The role of syllabic units. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 708-723. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.0037.
• García-Orza, J., Perea, M., & Muñoz, S. (2010). Are transposition effects specific to letters? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1603-1618. doi:10.1080/17470210903474278.
• Gómez, P., Ratcliff, R. & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115, 577-601. doi:10.1037/a0012667.
• Grainger, I. J. & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.518.
• Grainger, I. J., Granier, J. P., Farioli, F., Van Assche, E. & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2006). Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 865-884. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.865.
• Grainger, I. J. & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2003). Modeling Letter Position Coding in Printed Word Perception. En P. Bonin (Ed.), Mental lexicon: Some words to talk about words (pp. 1-23). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
• Guerrera, C. & Forster, K. I. (2008). Masked form priming with extreme transposition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 117-142. doi:10.1080/01690960701579722.
• Hutzler, F., Bergmann, J., Conrad, M., Kronbichler, M., Stenneken, P. & Jacobs, A. (2004). Inhibitory effects of first syllable frequency in lexical decision: an event related potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 372, 179-184. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2004.07.050.
• Johnson, R. L. (2009). The Quiet Clam Is Quite Calm: Transposed-Letter Neighborhood Effects on Eye Movements During Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 35, 943-969. doi:10.1037/a0015572.
• Johnson, R. L., Perea, M. & Rayner, K. (2007). Transposed letter effects in Reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 209-229. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.1.209.
• Lee, C. H. & Taft, M. (2009). Are onsets and codas important in processing letter position? A comparison of TL effects in English and Korean. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 530-542. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.002.
• Lee, C. H. & Taft, M. (2011). Subsyllabic structure reflected in letter confusability effects in Korean word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 129-134. doi:10.3758/s13423-010-0028-y.
• Lupker, S. J., Acha, J., Davis, C. J., & Perea, M. (en prensa). An investigation of the role of grapheme units in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.doi:10.1037/a0026886.
• Lupker, S. J., Perea, M., & Davis, C. J. (2008). Transposed letter priming effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 93-116. doi:10.1080/01690960701579714.
• Mayzner, M. S., & Tresselt, M. E. (1962). Anagram solution times: A function of word transition probabilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 510-513. doi:10.1037/h0043721.
• McClelland, J. & Rumelhart, D. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375.
• Muñoz, S., Perea, M., García-Orza, J, & Barber, H. (2012). Electrophysiological signatures of masked transposition priming in a same-different task: Evidence with strings of letters vs. pseudoletters. Neuroscience Letters, 515, 71-76. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.021.
• Norris, D., Kinoshita, S. & van Casteren, M. (2010). A stimulus sampling theory of letter identity and order. Journal of Memory and Language, 62 (3), 254-271. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.11.002.
• Paap, K., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E. & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573-594. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.89.5.573.
• Perea, M., Abu Mallouh, R., & Carreiras, M. (2010). The search of an input coding scheme: Transposed-letter priming in Arabic. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17, 375-380. doi:10.3758/PBR.17.3.375.
• Perea, M. & Acha, J. (2009). Does letter position coding depend on consonant/vowel status? Evidence with the masked priming technique. Acta Psychologica, 130, 127-137. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.11.001.
• Perea, M. & Carreiras, M. (1998). Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(1), 134-144. doi: 0.1037/0096-1523.24.1.134.
• Perea, M. & Carreiras, M. (2006a). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a syllable level? Experimental Psychology, 53, 308-315. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.53.4.308.
• Perea, M. & Carreiras, M. (2006b). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1600-1613. doi:10.1080/17470210500298880.
• Perea, M. & Carreiras, M. (2006c). Do transposed-letter effects occur across lexeme boundaries? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 418-422. doi:10.3758/BF03193863.
• Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Do orthotactics and phonology constrain the transposed-letter effect? Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 69-92. doi:10.1080/01690960701578146.
• Perea, M., Duñabeitia, J. A. & Carreiras, M. (2008). Transposed-letter priming effects for close versus distant transpositions. Experimental Psychology, 55, 384-393. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.55.6.384.
• Perea, M. & Estevez, A. (2008). Transposed letter similarity effects in naming pseudowords: Evidence from children and adults. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 33-46. doi:10.1080/09541440701306941.
• Perea, M. & Lupker, S. J. (2003a). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.). Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 97-120). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
• Perea, M. & Lupker, S. J. (2003b). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory and Cognition, 31, 829-841. doi:10.1080/09541440701306941.
• Perea, M. & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(2), 231-246. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.005.
• Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2007). La posición de las letras externas en el reconocimiento visual de palabras. Psicothema, 19, 559-564.
• Perea, M., Nakatani, C., & van Leeuwen, C. (2011). Transposition effects in reading Japanese Kana: Are they orthographic in nature? Memory and Cognition, 39, 700-707. doi:10.3758/s13421-010-0052-1.
• Perea, M., & Pérez, E. (2009). Beyond alphabetic orthographies: The role of form and phonology in transposition effects in Katakana. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 67-88. doi:10.1080/01690960802053924.
• Perea, M., Winskel, H., & Ratitamkul, T. (2012). On the flexibility of letter position coding during lexical processing: The case of Thai. Experimental Psychology,59, 68-73. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000127.
• Prinzmetal, W., Treiman, R. & Rho, S. H. (1986). How to see a reading unit. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 461-475. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(86)90038-0.
• Quintanilla, P. (2006). El papel de la sílaba en el reconocimiento visual de palabras. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Universidad de Murcia, Departamento de Psicología Básica y Metodología.
• Rayner, K., White, S. J., Johnson, R. L. & Liversedge, S. P. (2006). Raeding Wrods with jumbled lettres. There is a cost. Psychological science, 17, 192-193. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01684.x.
• Schoonbaert, S. & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333-367. doi:10.1080/01690960344000198.
• Schwartz, R. (1968). Anagram solving: A function of the frequency of vowel-consonant pattern. Psychonomic Science, 13, 229-230.
• Sebastián, N., Marti, M. A., Cuetos, F. & Carreiras, M. (2000). LEXESP. Léxico informatizado del español. Barcelona ediciones de la Universidad de Barcelona.
• Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. In W.G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II (pp. 276-315). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
• Topper, G. E., Macey, W. H., & Solso, R. L. (1973). Bigram versatility and bigram frequency. Behavior Research Methods, 5(1), 51-53. doi:10.3758/BF03200121.
• Tresselt, M. E. & Mayzner, M.S. (1968). Anagram solution times: A function of single and double letters solutions words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 7, 128-132. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(68)80176-8.
• Velan, H. & Frost, R. (2011). Words with and without internal structure: What determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing? Cognition, 118, 141-156. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.013.
• Velandrino, A. P. (1985). La tarea de identificación de anagramas y el proceso de codificación. Anales de Psicología, 2, 129-143.
• Vergara-Martínez, M., Perea, M., Marín, A., & Carreiras, M. (2011). The processing of consonants and vowels during letter identity and letter position assignment in visual-word recognition: An ERP study. Brain and Language, 118, 105-117. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2010.09.006.
• Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 221-243. doi:10.3758/BF03196158.
• Whitney, C. & Cornelissen, P. (2005). Letter position encoding and dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 274-301. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2005.00270.x.