Adopción de redes sociales virtualesampliación del modelo de aceptación tecnológica integrando confianza y riesgo percibido

Referencias bibliográficas

• Agarwal, R., Karahanna, E., 1998. On the multi-dimensional nature of compatibility beliefs in technology acceptance. In: Annual Meeting of the Diffusion Interest Group in Information Technology (DIGIT), Helsinki, Finlandia.
• Agarwal, R., Prasad, J., 1999. Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies? Decision Sciences 30, 361-391.
• Ahn, T., Ryu, S., Han, I., 2004. The impact of the online and offline feature on the user acceptance of Internet shopping malls. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 3, 405-420.
• Alsajjan, B., Dennis, C., 2006. The impact of trust on acceptance of online banking. In: European Association of Education and Research in Commercial Distribution. Ed. Brunel University-West London, Reino Unido.
• Amoako-Gyampah, K., Salam, A.F., 2004. An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Information and Management 41, 731-745.
• Anderson, E., Gerbing, D.W., 1988. Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103, 411-423.
• Bagozzi, R.P., 1982. A field investigation of causal relations among cognition, affect, intentions and behaviour. Journal of Marketing Research 19, 562-584.
• Bagozzi, R.P., Yi, Y., 1988. On the evaluation of structural equations models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16, 74-94.
• Bandura, A., 1982. Self-Efficacy mechanism in Human Agency. American Psychologist 37, 122-147.
• Bauer, R.A., 1967. Consumer Behaviour as Risk Taking. En: Cox, D.F. (Dir.), Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behaviour. Ed. Boston University Press, Boston, pp. 23-33.
• Bentler, P.M., 1995. EQS Structural Equations Program Manual. Ed. Multivariate Software, Inc, California.
• Bernadette, S., 1996. Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science 42, 85-93.
• Bhattacherjee, A., 2000. Acceptance of e-commerce services: The case of electronic rokerages. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 30, 411-420.
• Bhattacherjee, A., Premkumar, G., 2004. Understanding changes in beliefs and attitude toward Information Technology usage: A theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Quarterly 28, 229-254.
• Boyd, D., 2007. None of this is real. En: Karaganis, J. (Dir.). Structures of Participation. Ed. Social Science Research Council, Nueva York.
• Boyd, D.M., Ellison, N.B., 2008. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13.
• Brinberg, D., 1979. An examination of the determinants of intention and behavior: A comparison of two models. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 6, 560-575.
• Browne, M.W., Cudeck, R., 1993. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. En: Bollen, K.A., Long, J.S. (Dirs.). Testing structural equation models. Ed. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California, pp. 445-55.
• Burt, R.S., 1980. Cooptive corporate actor networks: a reconsideration of interlocking directorates involving American manufacturing. Administrative Science Quarteley 25, 557-582.
• Cachia, R., 2008 julio-septiembre. Los sitios de creación de redes. Aspectos sociales. Telos: Cuadernos de Comunicación, Tecnología y Sociedad 76, 69-84.
• Camarero, C., San Martín, S., 2007. Determinantes de la satisfacción y la confianza del comprador on-line ante distintos niveles de riesgo percibido. In: XIX Encuentro de Profesores Universitarios de Marketing, Vigo.
• Castañeda, J.A., 2005. El comportamiento del usuario de Internet: Análisis de los antecedentes y consecuencias de la fidelidad. Tesis Doctoral, Departamento de Marketing, Universidad de Granada.
• Chan, S., Lu, M., 2004. Understanding internet banking adoption and use behavior: A hong kong perspective. Journal of Global Information Management 12, 21-43.
• Chen, L., Gillenson, M., Sherrel, D., 2002. Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective. Information and Management 39, 705-719.
• Chircu, A.M., Davis, G.B., Kauffman, R.J., 2000. The role of trust and experience in the adoption of electronic commerce intermediaries. In: MISRC Work Paper. University of Minnesota.
• Chou, C.P., Bentler, P.M., Satorra, A., 1991. Scaled Test Statistic and Roboust Standard Errors for Nonnormal Data in Covariance Structure Analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 44, 347-357, n{ring operator} noviembre.
• Chuan-Chuan, J., Lu, H., 2000. Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use aweb site. International Journal of Information Management 20, 197-208.
• Chung, D., 2005. Something for nothing: understanding purchasing behaviors in social virtual environments. CyberPsychology & Behavior 8, 538-554.
• Cliff, L., Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., 2006. A face(book) in the crowd: social Searching vs. social browsing. In: 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work,. ACM Press, Nueva York, pp. 167-170.
• Constantinides, E., Lorenzo, C., Alarcón, M.C., Gómez, M.A., 2010. Adoption of Social Networking Sites by Dutch users. In: European Marketing Academy Conference, Copenague, Dinamarca.
• Davis, F.D., 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 319-340.
• Davis, F.D., 1993. User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 38, 475-487.
• Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R., 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35, 982-1003.
• Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warsaw, P.R., 1992. Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to use Computers in The Workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22, 1111-1132.
• Donath, J.S., 1998. Identity and deception in the virtual community. En: Kollock, P., Smith, M. (Dirs.). Communities in Cyberspace. Ed. Routledge, Londres. Donath, J., Boyd, D., 2004. Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal 22, 71-82.
• Dowling, G.R., Staelin, R., 1994 junio. A Model of Perceived Risk and Intended Risk-Handling Activity. Journal of Consumer Research 21, 119-134.
• Ellison, N.B., Heino, R., Gibbs, J., 2006. Managing impressions online: Selfpresentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11, 415-441.
• Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C.Y., Lampe, C., 2007. The benefits of Facebook friends: Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12, 1143-1168.
• Featherman, M., Fuller, M., 2003. Applying TAM to e-services adoption: The moderating role of perceived risk. In: 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, pp. 1-11.
• Featherman, M.S., Pavlou, P.A., 2003. Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59, 451-474.
• Fenech, T., 1998. Using perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness to predict acceptance of the World Wide Web. Computer Networks & ISDN Systems 30, 629-630.
• Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Ed. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachussetts.
• Flavián, C., Guinalíu, M., 2007. Un análisis de la influencia de la confianza y del riesgo percibido sobre la lealtad a un sitio web: el caso de la distribución de servicios gratuitos. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa 16, 159- 178.
• Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F., 1981. Evaluating structural equations models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18, 39-50.
• Gefen, D., 2000. E-commerce: The role of familiarity and trust. The International Journal of Management Science 28, 725-737.
• Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., 2003a. Inexperience and experience with online Stores: The importance ofTAMand Trust. IEE Transactions on Engineering Management 50, 307-321.
• Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., 2003b. Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated Model. MIS Quarterly 27, 51-90.
• Gefen, D., Straub, D.W., 1997. Gender differences in the perception and use of E-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Quarterly 21, 389-400.
• Gefen, D., Straub, D.W., 2000. The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of Association for Information Systems 1, 1-28.
• Glaser, M., 2007. Your Guide to Social Networking Online. MediaShift. Disponible en: http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2007/08/your-guide-to-social-networkingonline241.html.
• González, C., Díaz, A.M., Trespalacios, J.A., 2006. Riesgo percibido en marcas del distribuidor. Un modelo integrador. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 137-167.
• Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C., 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis. Ed. Prentice Hall, Nueva York.
• Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., 2006. Multivariate data analysis. Ed. Prentice-Hall, Nueva York.
• Harrison, D.A., Mykytyn, P.P., Riemenschneider, C.K., 1997. Executive decisions about adoption of information technology in small business: Theory and empirical tests. Information Systems Research 8, 171-195.
• Henderson, R., Divett, M., 2003. Perceived uselfulness, ease of use and electronic supermarket use. International Journal of Computer Studies 59, 383-395.
• Hernández, B., Jiménez, J., Martín, M.J., 2007. Influencia de las TIC en la gestión de la información empresarial. En: Ayala, J.C. (Dir.). Conocimiento, innovación y emprendedores: Camino al futuro. Ed. Universidad de la Rioja, Madrid.
• Horton, R., Buck, T., Waterson, P.E., Clegg, C., 2001. Explaining intranet use with the technology acceptance model. Journal of Information Technology 16, 237-249.
• Hu, L., Bentler, P.M., Kano, Y., 1992. Cant Test Statistics in covariance Structure Analysis be Trusted? Psychological Bulletin 112, 351-362.
• Igbaria, M., 1993. User acceptance of microcomputer technology. An empirical test. International Journal of Management Science 21, 73-90.
• Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., Cavaye, A.L.M., 1997. Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: a structural equation model. MIS Quarterly 21, 279-302.
• INE, 2008. Encuesta sobre Equipamiento y Uso de Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación en los hogares. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Disponible en: http://www.ine.es.
• James, L.R., Mulaik, S.A., Brett, J.M., 1982. Causal Analysis. Ed. Sage, Beverly Hills, California.
• Jarvenpaa, S.L., Tractinsky, N., Vitale, M., 2000. Consumer trust in an Internet store. Information Technology and Management 1, 45-71.
• Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., 1999. The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease of-use. Information & Management 35, 237-250.
• Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., Chervany, N.L., 1999. Information Technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly 23, 183-213.
• King, W.R., He, J., 2006. Understanding the role and methods of metaanalysis in IS research. Communications of the AIS 43, 740-755.
• Know, O., Wen, Y., 2010. An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use. Computers in Human Behavior 26, 254-263.
• Lampe, C., Ellison, N., Steinfeld, C., 2007. Profile elements as signals in an online social network. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, Estados Unidos.
• Lau, T., Lee, H., 1999. Consumers' trust in a brand and the link to brand loyalty. Journal of Market Focused Management 4, 341-370.
• Lederer, A.L., Maupin, D.J., Sens, M.P., Zhuang, Y., 2000. The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems 29, 269- 282.
• Lee, Y., Kozar, K.A., Larsen, K.R.T., 2003. The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, present, and Future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 12, 752-780.
• Lee, H., Lee, Y., Kwon, D., 2005. The intention to use computerized reservation systems: the moderating effects of organizational support and supplier incentive. Journal of Business Research 58, 1552-1561.
• Legris, P., Ingham, J., Collerette, P., 2003. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management 40, 191-204.
• Lenhart, A., Madden, M., 2007. Social networking websites and teens: An overview. Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington. Disponible en: http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIPSNSDataMemoJan2007.pdf.
• Liaw, S.S., Huang, H.-M., 2003. An investigation of user attitudes toward search engines as an information retrieval tool. Computers in Human Behavior 19, 751- 765.
• Lin, C.C., Lu, H., 2000. Towards an Understanding of the Behavioral Intention to Use aWeb site. International Journal of Information Management 20, 197-208.
• Liu, X., Wei, K.K., 2003. An empirical study of product differences in consumers' ecommerce adoption behaviour. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 2, 229-239.
• Luarn, P., Li, H.-H., 2005. Toward an understanding of the behavioural intention to use mobile banking. Computers in Human Behavior 21, 873-891.
• Luhmann, N., 1979. Trust and Power. Ed. John Wiley, Londres. Lynch, J., Ariely, D., 2000. Wine online: Search costs affect competition on price quality and distribution. Marketing Science 19, 83-204.
• Malhotra, Y., Galletta, D.F., 1999. Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: theoretical bases and empirical validation. In: 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference.
• Mathieson, K., 1991. Predicting user intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior. Information Systems Research 2, 173-191.
• Mathwick, C., 2002. Understanding the online consumer: A typology of online relational norms and behaviour. Journal of Interactive Marketing 16, 40-55.
• Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D., 1995.Anintegrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review 20, 709-734.
• McCoy, S., Galletta, D.F., King, W.R., 2007. Applying TAM across cultures: the need for caution. European Journal of Information Systems 16, 81-90.
• McKnight, D.H., Choudhury, V., Kacmer, C., 2002a. The impact of initial consumer trust on intentions to transact with a web site: A trust building model. Journal of Strategic Information System 11, 297-323.
• McKnight, D.H., Cummings, L.L., Chervany, N.L., 1998. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationship. Academy of Management Review 23, 473-490.
• McKnight, D.H., Cummings, L.L., Chervany, N.L., 2002b. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research 13, 334-361.
• McKnight, D.H., Kacmar, C.J., Choudhury, V., 2004a. Shifting factors and the ineffectiveness of third party assurance seals: A two-stage model of initial trust en a web business. Electronic Markets 14, 252-266.
• McKnight, D.H., Kacmar, C.J., Choudhury, V., 2004b. Dispositional trust and distrust distinctions in predicting high- and low-risk Internet expert advice site perceptions. eService Journal 3, 35-58.
• Metzger, M.J., 2006. Effects of site, vendor, and consumer characteristics on Web site trust and disclosure. Communication Research 33, 155-179.
• Monsoriu, M., 2008. Redes sociales profesionales: imprescindibles. Bit, 74-77.
• Moon, J., Kim, Y., 2001. Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information and Management 38, 217-230.
• Moore, G.C., Benbasat, I., 1991. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research 2, 192-222.
• Muñoz, F., 2008. La adopción de una innovación basada en la Web. Análisis y modelización de los mecanismos generadores de confianza. Tesis Doctoral, Departamento de Marketing, Universidad de Granada.
• Murovec, N., Prodan, I., 2009. Absorptive capacity, its determinants, and influence on innovation output: Cross-cultural validation of the structural model. Technovation 29, 859-872.
• Nunnally, J., Bernstein, I.H., 1994. Psychometric Theory. Ed. Mc Graw-Hill, Nueva York.
• O'Cass, A., Fenech, T., 2003. Web retailing adoption: exploring the nature of Internet users web retailing behaviour. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 10, 81-94.
• Ofcom, 2008. Social networking: A quantitative and qualitative research report into attitudes, behaviours, and use. Office of Communications. Disponible en: http://www.ofcom.org.uk/advice/media literacy/medlitpub/medlitpubrss/ socialnetworking/report.pdf.
• Papadopoulou, P., 2007. Applying virtual reality for trust-building ecommerce environments. Virtual Reality 11, 107-127.
• Pavlou, P.A., 2002a. A theory of Planned Behavior Perspective to the Consumer Adoption of Electronic Commerce. MIS Quarterly, 1-51.
• Pavlou, P.A., 2002b.Whatdrives electronic commerce?ATheory of Planned Behavior perspective. Academy of Management Proceeding, 1-6.
• Pavlou, P.A., 2003. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 7, 69-103.
• Pavlou, P.A., Fygenson, M., 2006. Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior. MIS Quarterly 30, 115-144.
• Pikkarainen, T., Pikkarainen, K., Karjaluoto, H., Pahnila, S., 2004. Consumer acceptance of online banking: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 14, 224-235.
• Preece, J., Maloney-Krichmar, D., 2003. Online Communities. En: Jacko, J., Sears, A. (Dirs.). Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah, Nueva Jersey, pp. 596-620.
• Ramayah, T., 2006. Interface characteristics, perceived ease of use and intention to use an online library in Malaysia. Information Development 22, 123-133.
• Rashtchy, S., Kessler, A.M., 2007. The User Revolution: The New Advertising Ecosystem and the Rise of the Internet as aMass Medium. Piper Jaffray: East Palo Alto. Disponible en: http://www.piperjaffray.com.
• Reid, E., 1999. Hierarchy and power: Social control in cyberspace. En: Smith, M.A., Kollock, P. (Dirs.). Communities in Cyberspace. Ed. Routledge, Londres, pp. 107-33.
• Resnick, P., 2001. Beyond bowling together: Sociotechnical capital. En: Carroll, J. (Dir.). HCI in the New Millennium. Ed. Addison-Wesley, Boston, Massachussetts, pp. 247-72.
• Riegner, C., 2007. Word of Mouth on the Web: The Impact of Web 2.0 on Consumer Purchase Decisions. Journal of Advertising Research 47 (4), 436-447.
• Rodríquez, N., Liñares, S., De la Llana, M., 2009. The Main Determinants of Web 2. 0 Acceptance: The Case of Youtube. In: 8th International Marketing Trends Congress, París.
• Roselius, T., 1971. Consumer Rankings of Risk Reduction Methods. Journal of Marketing 35, 55-61.
• Ruiz, A., Izquierdo, A., Calderón, E., 2007. Actitudes hacia Internet, riesgo percibido y confianza: su influencia sobre la compra de pernoctaciones hoteleras. En: Ayala Calvo, J.C. (Dir.). Conocimiento, innovación y emprendedores: camino al futuro. Ed. Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de la Rioja, La Rioja, pp. 2323-36.
• Sánchez, M.J., Roldán, J.L., 2004. Web Acceptance and Usage Model: a Comparison between Goal-directed and Experiential Web Users. Internet Research-Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 15, 21-48.
• Sánchez, M.J., Rondán, F.J., Villarejo, A.F., 2007. Un modelo empírico de adaptación y uso de la Web. Utilidad, facilidad de uso y flujo percibidos. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de Empresa, n{ring operator}30, 153-179.
• Segars, A.H., Grover, V., 1993. Re-examining perceived easy of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly 17, 517-525.
• Shang, R., Chen, Y., Shen, L., 2005. Extrinsic versus intrinsic motivations for consumers to shop on-line. Information and Management 42, 401-413.
• Shih, H.P., 2004. Extended Technology Acceptance Model of Internet utilization behaviour. Information & Management 41, 719-729.
• Shih, Y., Fang, K., 2004. The use of a decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior to study Internet banking in Taiwan. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 14, 213-223.
• Shin, D.H., 2008a. Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to Cyworld user behaviour. CyberPsychology and Behavior 11, 12-20.
• Shin, D.H., 2008b. Understanding purchasing behaviors in a virtual economy: Consumer behavior involving virtual currency in Web 2.0 communities. Interacting with Computers 20, 433-446.
• Sproull, L., Kiesler, S., 1991. Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Ed. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachussetts.
• Szajna, B., 1996. Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science 42, 85-92.
• Taylor, S., Todd, P.A., 1995a. Understanding Information Technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research 6, 144-176.
• Taylor, S., Todd, P.A., 1995b. Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly 19, 561-570.
• Triandis, H.C., 1977. Interpersonal behavior Monterey. Ed. Brooks/Cole, California. Van Der Heijden, H., 2003. Factors Influencing the Usage of Websites: The Case of a Generic Portal in the Netherlands. Information & Management 40, 541-549.
• Venkatesh, V., 2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research 11, 342-365.
• Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D., 1996. A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test. Decision Sciences 27, 451-481.
• Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D., 2000. A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science 46, 186-204.
• Vijayasarathy, L.R., 2004. Predicting consumer intentions to use online shopping: The case for an augmented technology acceptance model. Information &Management 41, 747-762.
• Vila, N., Küster, I., Aldás, J., 2000. Desarrollo y validación de escalas de medida en marketing. Quaderns de Treball.
• Wakefield, R.K., Whitten, D., 2006. Examining user perceptions of third-party organization credibility and trust in e-retailer. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 18, 1-19.
• Wang, Y.S., Wang, Y.M., Lin, H.H., Tang, T.I., 2003. Determinants of user acceptance of internet banking: An empirical study. International Journal of Service Industry Management 14, 501-519.
• Wellman, B., 1999. The network community: An introduction. En: Wellman, B. (Dir.). Networks in the global village: Life in contemporary communities. Ed. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 1-48.
• Wellman, B., 2001. Physical place and cyberplace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 25, 227-252.
• West, S.G., Finch, J.F., Curran, P.J., 1995. Structural Equation Models with Nonormal Variables: Problems and Remedies. En: Hoyle, R.H. (Dir.). Structural Equation Modelling: Concepts, Issues and Applications. Ed. Sage Publications, California.
• Willis, T., 2008. An Evaluation of the Technology Acceptance Model as a Means of Understanding Online Social Networking Behavior. Tesis Doctoral, Estados Unidos.
• Withers, K., 2007. Young people and social networking sites: Briefing to guide policy responses. Institute of Public Policy Research, Londres.
• Wu, J.C., Wang, S.C., 2005. What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information and Management 42, 719-729.
• Yi, L.J., 2002. Read shows on the Internet: Taking individual investors for a ride on the information highway. Duke Law Journal 52, 243-271.
• Yu, J., Ha, I., Choi, M., Rho, J., 2005. Extending the TAM for an e-commerce. Information and Management 42, 965-976