Addressind the limitations of protocol analysis in the study of complex human behavior

Referencias bibliográficas

• Austin, J. & Delaney, P.F. (1998). Protocol analysis as a tool for behavior analysis. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 15, 41-56.
• Austin, J. & Mawhinney, T.C. (1999). Using concurrent verbal reports to examine data analyst verbal behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 18, 61-81.
• Barnes, D. (1989). Behavior-behavior analysis, human schedule performance, and radical behaviorism. The Psychological Record, 39, 339-350.
• Barnes-Holmes, D., Hayes, S.C. & Dymond, S. (2001). Self and self-directed rules. In S.C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes & B. Roche (Eds.). Relational frame theory: A post-skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.
• Barnes, D. & Keenan, M. (1989). Instructed human fixed-interval performance: the effects of the experimental settings. The Psychological Record, 39, 351-364.
• Barnes, D. & Keenan, M. (1993). Concurrent activities and instructed human fixed-interval performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 501-520.
• Baron, A., Kaufman, A. & Stauber, K.A. (1969). Effects of instructions and reinforcement feedback on human operant behavior maintained by fixed-interval reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 701-712.
• Barrett, D.M., Deitz, S.M., Gaydos, G.A. & Quinn, P.C. (1987). The effects of programmed contingencies and social conditions on response stereotipy with human subjects. The Psychological Record, 37, 489-505.
• Bhaskar, R. & Simon, H.A. (1977). Problem solving in semantically rich domains: An example from engineering thermodynamics. Cognitive science, 1, 193-215.
• Chase, P.N. & Danforth, J.S. (1991). The role of rules in concept learning. In L.J. Hayes & P.N. Chase (Eds.). Dialogues on verbal behavior. Reno, NV: Context Press.
• Critchfield, T.S. & Epting, L.K. (1998). The trouble with babies and the value of bathwater: complexities in the use of verbal reports as data. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 15, 65-74.
• Critchfield, T.S., Tucker, J.A. & Vuchinich, R.E. (1998). Self-reports methods. In K. Lattal & M. Perone (Eds.). Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
• Crutcher, R.J. (1994). Telling what we know: the use of verbal report methodologies in psychological research. Psychological Science, 5, 241-245
• Crutcher, R.J., Ericsson, K.A. & Wichura, C.A. (1994). Improving the encoding of verbal reports by using MPAS: A computer-aided encoding system. Behavior research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 26, 167-171.
• Dixon, M.R. & Hayes, L.J. (1998). Effects of differing instructional histories on the resurgence of rule-following. The Psychological Record, 48, 275-292.
• Doyle, A.C. (1892). The memoirs of Sherlock Holmes. Reprinted in Sherlock Holmes: Complete novels and stories (vol. 1). New-York: Bantam Books.
• Dube, W.V., McIlvane, W.J., Callahan, T.D. & Stoddard, L.W. (1993). The search for stimulus equivalence in nonverbal organisms. The Psychological Record, 43, 761-778.
• Dymond, S. & Critchfield, T.S. (2001). Neither dark age nor renaissance: Research and authorship trends in the experimental analysis of human behavior (1980-1999). The Behavior Analyst, 24, 241-253.
• Ericsson, K.A. & Simon, H.A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215-251.
• Ericsson, K.A. and Simon, H.A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Fisher, C. (1988). Advancing the study of programming with computer-aided protocol analysis. In G. Olson, E. Soloway & S. Sheppard (Eds.). Empirical studies of programmers: 1987 workshop. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
• Gómez, I. & Luciano, M.C. (2000). Autocontrol a través de reglas que alteran la función [Self-control through altering function rules]. Psicothema, 12, 418-425.
• Harzem, P., Lowe, C.F. & Bagshaw, M. (1978). Verbal control in human operant behavior. The Psychological Record, 28, 405-423.
• Hayes, S.C. (1986). The case of the silent dog: Verbal reports and the análisis of rules. A review of K. Anders Ericsson and Herbert A. Simon, Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Journal of the Experimental Análisis of Behavior, 45, 351-363.
• Hayes, S.C. (1987). Upward and downward continuity: It’s time to change our strategic assumptions. Behavior Analysis, 22, 3-6.
• Hayes, S.C. (1989a). Nonhumans have not yet shown stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Análisis of Behavior, 51, 385-392.
• Hayes, S.C. (1989b). Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies and instructional control. Reno, NV: Context Press.
• Hayes, S.C. & Brownstein, A.J. (1986). Mentalism, behavior-behavior relations and a behavior analytic view of the purposes of science. The Behavior Analyst, 9, 175-190.
• Hayes, S.C. & Hayes, L.J. (1992). Verbal relations and the evolution of behavior análisis. American Psychologist, 47,1383-1395.
• Hayes, S.C., White, D. & Bissett, R.T. (1998). Protocol analysis and the “silent dog” method of analyzing the impact of self-generated rules. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 15, 57-63.
• Hayes, S.C., Zettle, R.D. & Rosenfarb, I. (1989). Rule following. In S.C. Hayes (Ed.). Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control. Reno, NV: Context Press.
• Hyten, C. & Reilly, M.P. (1992). The renaissance of the experimental analysis of human behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 15, 109-114.
• Holland, J.G. (1958). Counting by humans on fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1, 179-181.
• Leander, J.D., Lippman, L.G. & Meyer, M.M. (1968). Fixed interval performance as related to instructions and subjects verbalizations of the reinforcement contingency. The Psychological Record, 18, 469-474.
• Lowe, C.F. (1979). Determinants of human operant behavior. In M.D. Zeiler & P. Harzem (Eds.). Advances in the analysis of behavior: Vol. 1. Reinforcement and the organization of behavior. Chichester: Wiley.
• Skinner, B.F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appelton-Century-Crofts.
• Lowe, C.F., Harzem, P. & Hughes, S. (1978). Determinants of operant behavior in humans: some differences from animals. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 373-386.
• Luciano, M.C. (1993). La conducta verbal a la luz de recientes investigaciones: su papel sobre otras conductas verbales y no verbales. [Verbal behavior according to recent research: Its role on verbal and nonverbal behavior.] Psicothema, 5, 351-374.
• Matthews, B.A., Shimoff, E., Catania, A.C. & Sagvolden, T. (1977). Uninstructed human responding: sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 453-467.
• Navarick, D.J., Bernstein, D.J. & Fantino, E. (1990). The experimental analysis of human behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 159-162.
• Newell, A. y Simon, H.A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall
• Nisbett, R.E. y Wilson, T.D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological review, 84, 231-259
• Normand, M. (2001). Collecting concurrent verbal reports: Some considerations and methodological refinements. In Miguel, C. (Chair). The study of verbal behavior and private events: Some methodological considerations. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, New Orleans.
• Payne, J.W. (1994). Thinking aloud: insights into information processing. Psychological Science, 5, 241-256
• Perone, M. (1988). Laboratory lore and research practices in the experimental analysis of human behavior: Use and abuse of subjects’ verbal reports. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 71-75.
• Potter, B. (1999). Some additional considerations of protocol analyses. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 16, 57-61
• Potter, B., Huber, S. & Michael, J. (1997). The role of mediating verbal behavior in selection-based responding. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 14, 41-56.
• Rehfeldt, R.A. & Dixon, M.R. (2000). Investigating the relation between self-talk and emergent stimulus relations. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 18, 28-29.
• Rehfeldt, R.A., Dixon, M.R., Hayes, L.J. & Steele, A. (1998). Stimulus equivalence and the blocking effect. The Psychological Record, 48, 647-664.
• Rehfeldt, R.A. & Hayes, L.J. (2000). The long-term retention of generalized equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 50, 405-428.
• Russo, J.E., Johnson, E.J. & Stephens, D. (1989). The validity of verbal protocols. Memory & Cognition, 17, 759-769.
• Sanderson, P.M., James, J.M. & Seidler, K.S. (1989). SHAPA: An interactive software environment for protocol analysis. Ergonomics, 32, 1271-1302.
• Shimoff, E. (1986). Post-session verbal reports and the experimental analysis of behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 4, 19-22.
• Shimoff, E., Catania, A.C. & Matthews, B.A. (1981). Uninstructed human responding: sensitivity of low rate performances to schedule contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36, 207-220.
• Skinner, B.F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appelton-Century-Crofts.
• Skinner, B.F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: The Free Press.
• Sidman, M. & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination versus matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5-22.
• Taylor, I. & O´Reilly, M.F. (1997). Toward a functional analysis of private verbal self-regulation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 43-58.
• Wallander, R. (2001). The classification and graphical representation of concurrent verbal reports: Methodological considerations in the use of protocol analysis. In Miguel, C. (Chair). The study of verbal behavior and private events: Some methodological considerations. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, New Orleans.
• Watson, J.B. (1920). Is thinking merely the action of language mechanisms? British Journal of Psychology, 11, 87-104
• Weiner, H. (1970). Instructional control of human operant responding during extinction following fixed-ratio conditioning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 391-394.
• White, P.A. (1988). Knowing more about what we can tell: ‘‘Introspectice access’’ and causal report accuracy 10 years later. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 13-45.
• Williams, R.A. (1985). Schedule performance and verbal behavior under solitary and social training conditions. Dissertation Abstracts International-B, 46, 687.
• Wulfert, E., Dougher, M.J. & Greenway, D.E. (1991). Protocol analysis of the correspondence of verbal behavior and equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 489-504.
• Wulfert, E., Greenway, D.E. & Dougher, M.J. (1994). Third-order equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 44, 411-439.
• Zettle, R.D. & Young, M.K. (1987). Rule-following and human operant responding: conceptual and methodological considerations. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5, 33-39.