Critical Mass of Women on Boards and Firm Performance: Insights from Spanish State-Owned Enterprises

Bibliographic References

• Abdullah, S. N., Ismail, K. N. I. K., & Nachum, L. (2016). Does having women on boards create value? The impact of societal perceptions and corporate governance in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal, 37(3), 466–476.
• Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.
• Amah, O. (2018). Determining the antecedents and outcomes of servant leadership. Journal of General Management, 43(3), 126–138.
• Arellano, M. (1987). Computing robust standard errors for within-groups estimators. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 49(4), 431–434.
• Bennouri, M., Tawhid, C., Haithem, N., & Mehdi, N. (2018). Female board directorship and firm performance: What really matters? Journal of Banking & Finance, 88, 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.12.010
• Bhagat, S., & Jefferis, R. (2002). The econometrics of corporate governance. The MITPress.
• Borghans, L., Golsten, B., Heckman, J., & Meijers, H. (2009). Gender differences in risk aversion and ambiguity aversion. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(2–3), 649–658.
• Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239–253.
• Bruton, G. D., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Stan, C., & Xu, K. (2015). State-owned enterprises around the world as hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1), 92–114.
• Butt, S., Faisal, F., Chohan, M. A., Ali, A., & Ramakrishnan, S. (2023). Do shadow economy and institutions lessen the environmental pollution? Evidence from panel of ASEAN-9 economies. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15, 4800–4828.
• Campuzano, M. (2019). Force and inertia: A systematic review of women’s leadership in male-dominated organizational cultures in the United States. Human Resource Development Review, 18(4), 437–469.
• Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other?: A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), 1(1), 41–69.
• Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: Global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 2.
• Carreira, M. D. C. S. (2021). Accountability and transparency policies in Spanish Public-Owned Enterprises (POEs)/Spain. ACCOUNTABILITY, ANTI-CORRUPTION, AND TRANSPARENCY POLICIES IN PUBLIC-OWNED ENTERPRISES (POES), Ciriec Studies Series 2. 61.
• Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity and firm value. Financial Review, 38, 33–53.
• Casteuble, C., Lepetit, L., and Tran, T. T. 2019. Women on boards: Do quotas affect firm performance? (working document No. hal-02385034).
• Chen, J., Leung, W. S., & Goergen, M. (2017). The impact of board gender composition on dividend payouts. Journal of Corporate Finance, 43, 86–105.
• Clò, S., Fiorio, C. V., & Florio, M. (2017). The targets of state capitalism: Evidence from M&A deals. European Journal of Political Economy, 47, 61–74.
• Dale-Olsen, H., Schøne, P., & Verner, M. (2013). Diversity among Norwegian boards of directors: Does a quota for women improve firm performance? Feminist Economics, 19(4), 110–135.
• De Masi, S., Słomka-Gołębiowska, A., & Paci, A. (2021). Women on boards and monitoring tasks: an empirical application of Kanter’s theory. Management Decision, 59(13), 56–72.
• Dittmann, I., Maug, E., & Schneider, C. (2010). Bankers on the boards of German firms: What they do, what they are worth, and why they are (still) there. Review of Finance, 14(1), 35–71.
• Dolan, J. A. (2002). Representative bureaucracy in the federal executive: Gender and spending priorities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(3), 353–375.
• Duff, A. J. (2013). Performance management coaching: Servant leadership and gender implications. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34(3), 204–221.
• Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 781–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00241
• Ely, R. J., Ibarra, H., & Kolb, D. M. (2011). Taking gender into account: Theory and design for women’s leadership development programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(3), 474–493. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2010.0046
• Erdurmazli, E. (2019). On the servant leadership behaviors perceived in voluntary settings: The influences on volunteers’ motivation and organizational commitment. SAGE Open, July-September, 2019, 1–17.
• Faccio, M., Marchica, M. T., & Mura, R. (2016). CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 39, 193–209.
• Fernández, S., & Lee, H. (2016). The transformation of the South African public service: Exploring the impact of racial and gender representation on organizational effectiveness. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 54(1), 91–116.
• Ferreira, D. (2015). Board diversity: Should we trust research to inform policy? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(2), 108–111.
• Fitzsimmons, T. W., & Callan, V. J. (2016). Applying a capital perspective to explain continued gender inequality in the C-suite. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 354–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.11.003
• Francoeur, C., Labelle, R., & Sinclair-Desgagné, B. (2008). Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. Journal of business ethics, 81, 83–95.
• García Lara, J., García, B., Mora, A., & Scapin, M. (2017). The monitoring role of female directors over accounting quality. Journal of Corporate Finance, 45(August), 651–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.05.016
• García-Meca, E., García-Sánchez, I. M., & Martínez-Ferrero, J. (2015). Board diversity and its effects on bank performance: An international analysis. Journal of banking & Finance, 53, 202–214.
• Gil-López, Á., Arzubiaga, U., Román, E. S., & De Massis, A. (2022). The Visible Hand of corporate entrepreneurship in state-owned enterprises: a longitudinal study of the Spanish National Postal Operator. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18(3), 1033–1071.
• Girma, S., Gong, Y., & Görg, H. (2009). What determines innovation activity in Chinese state-owned enterprises? The role of foreign direct investment. World Development, 37(4), 866–873.
• Gras-Gil, E. Moreno-Enguix, M. R., & Henández-Fernández, J. (2020). Gender and internal control systems in Spanish local governments. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 35(5), 463–480.
• Green, C. P., & Homroy, S. (2018). Female directors, board committees and firm performance. European Economic Review, 102, 19–38.
• Gupta, A., & Kumar, S. (2020). Comparing the performance of public and private enterprises: Case for a reappraisal–evidence from India. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 34(1), 87–100.
• Guy, M. E. (2010). When diversity makes a difference. Public Integrity, 12(2), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.2753/PIN1099-9922120205
• Hogue, M., & Lord, R. G. (2007). A multilevel, complexity theory approach to understanding gender bias in leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 370–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.006
• Joecks, J., Pull, K., & Vetter, K. (2013). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance: What exactly constitutes a “critical mass? Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 61–72.
• Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. Basic Books.
• Khan, M. H., Fraz, A., Hassan, A., & Abedifar, P. (2020). Female board representation, risk-taking and performance: Evidence from dual banking systems. Finance Research Letters, 37, 101541.
• Kroll, H., & Kou, K. (2019). Innovation output and state ownership: Empirical evidence from China’s listed firms. Industry and Innovation, 26(2), 176–198.
• Lemoine, G. J., Aggarwal, I., & Steed, L. B. (2016). When women emerge as leaders: Effects of extraversion and gender composition in groups. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 470–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.12.008
• Leydesdorff, L., & Deakin, M. (2011). The Triple-Helix model of smart cities: A neo-evolutionary perspective. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 53–63.
• Liang, H., Ren, B., & Sun, S. L. (2015). An anatomy of state control in the globalization of state-owned enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(2), 223–240.
• Lim, H. (2006). Representative bureaucracy: Rethinking substantive effects and active representation. Public Administration Review, 66(2), 193–204.
• Lindberg, M., Lindgren, M., & Packendorff, J. (2014). Quadruple Helix as a way to bridge the gender gap in entrepreneurship: The case of an innovation system project in the Baltic Sea Region. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(1), 94–113.
• Liu, Y., Wei, Z., & Xie, F. (2014). Do women directors improve firm performance in China? Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 169–184.
• Low, D. C., Roberts, H., & Whiting, R. H. (2015). Board gender diversity and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Hong Kong, South Korea, Malaysia and Singapore. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 35, 381–401.
• Lucas-Pérez, M. E., Mínguez-Vera, A., Baixauli-Soler, J. S., Martín-Ugedo, J. F., & Sánchez-Marín, G. (2014). Women on the board and managers’ pay: Evidence from Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 129, 265–280.
• Lückerath-Rovers, M. (2013). Women on boards and firm performance. Journal of Management & Governance, 17, 491–509.
• Lv, Z., Pan, Q., and Xu, T. (2024). Hide and seek: Female parliamentarians and the informal economy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–18.
• Macmillan, R., Shofia, N., & Sigle, W. (2018). Gender and the politics of death: Female representation, political and developmental context, and population health in a cross-national panel. Demography, 55(5), 1905–1934.
• Martín-Ugedo, J. F., & Minguez-Vera, A. (2014). Firm performance and women on the board: Evidence from Spanish small and medium-sized enterprises. Feminist Economics, 20(3), 136–162.
• Mavisakalyan, A., & Tarverdi, Y. (2019). Gender and climate change: Do female parliamentarians make difference? European Journal of Political Economy, 56, 151–164.
• Meier, K. J., & Nicholson-Crotty, J. (2006). Gender, representative bureaucracy, and law enforcement: The case of sexual assault. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 850–860.
• Miragaia, D. A., Ferreira, J. J., & da Costa, C. D. (2022). What are workers’ perceptions of women’s organizational leadership? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(4), 3345–3363.
• Neubert, M. J., & Taggar, S. (2004). Pathways to informal leadership: The moderating role of gender on the relationship of individual differences and team member network centrality to informal leadership emergence. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.02.006
• Nguyen, T., Locke, S., & Reddy, K. (2015). Does boardroom gender diversity matter? Evidence from a transitional economy. International Review of Economics & Finance, 37, 184–202.
• OECD. (2020). OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
• Orser, B., Riding, A., & Manley, K. (2006). Women entrepreneurs and financial capital. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 643–665.
• Osma, B. G. (2008). Board independence and real earnings management: The case of R&D expenditure. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(2), 116–131.
• Pfeffer, J., and Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external con organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harp
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford Business Books.
• Pillemer, J., Graham, E. R., & Burke, D. M. (2014). The face says it all: CEOs, gender, and predicting corporate performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 855–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.07.002
• Post, C., & Kris, B. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1546–1571.
• Reguera-Alvarado, N., De Fuentes, P., & Laffarga, J. (2017). Does board gender diversity influence financial performance? Evidence from Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 141, 337–350.
• Rivas, F. (2013). An experiment on corruption and gender. Bulletin of Economic Research, 65(1), 10–42.
• Rossi, F., Hu, C., & Foley, M. (2017). Women in the boardroom and corporate decisions of Italian listed companies. Management Decision, 5(7), 1578–1595.
• Smith, N., Smith, V., & Verner, M. (2006). Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2,500 Danish firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55, 569–593.
• Storvik, A. E., & Schøne, P. (2008). In search of the glass ceiling: Gender and recruitment to management in Norway’s state bureaucracy1. The British Journal of Sociology, 59(4), 729–755.
• Terjesen, S., Couto, E. B., & Francisco, P. M. (2016). Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi-country study of board diversity. Journal of Management & Governance, 20, 447–483.
• Toninelli, P. (2008). From private to public to private again: A long-term perspective on nationalization. Analyze Social, 2, 675–692.
• Upadhyay, A., & Zeng, H. (2014). Gender and ethnic diversity on boards and corporate information environment. Journal of Business Research, 67, 2456–2463.
• Van Dierendonck, D. (2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228–1261.
• Vecchio, R. P. (2002). Leadership and gender advantage. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 643–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00156-X